Advertisement

Their Reign, Their Game? Accessing the Powerful

  • Olga PetintsevaEmail author
  • Rita Faria
  • Yarin Eski
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter delves into practical issues of respondent selection, and of finding and accessing expert and elite participants for research interviews. It discusses powerful participants’ specificities and offers solutions for improving the chances of generating samples of respondents and collecting high-quality data. After addressing sampling techniques, it discusses (gaining and maintaining) access, including formal permissions and informal ways of contacting people; the role of gatekeepers; making your way through formal and informal hierarchies; ways of communicating with elites and experts, managing limited time frames, as well as presenting yourself and the research. Furthermore, the chapter discusses ethics and discretion while getting and maintaining access, especially informed consent, anonymity, recording the interview, transparency regarding the researcher’s role and goals.

Keywords

Sampling Access Gatekeepers Approval Snowballing 

References

  1. Aberbach, J. D., & Rockman, B. A. (2003). Conducting and coding elite interviews. Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 673–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, 33, 1–4.Google Scholar
  3. Bloor, M. J., & Wood, F. C. (2006). Keywords in qualitative methods: A vocabulary of research concepts. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boeri, M., & Lamonica, A. (2015). Sampling designs and issues in qualitative criminology. In H. Copes & J. M. Miller (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of qualitative criminology (pp. 125–143). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cruz, J. N., Faria, R., Leite, A. L., & Sousa, P. (2015). How does law enforcement respond to entrepreneurial white-collar crime? Some insights from Portugal. In W. Huisman, J. van Erp, G. V. Walle, & J. Beckers (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of white collar and corporate crime in Europe (pp. 512–530). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Cuncliffe, A., & Alcadipani, R. (2016). The politics of access in fieldwork: Immersion, backstage dramas and deception. Organizational Research Methods, 19(4), 535–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Desmond, M. (2004). Methodological challenges posed in studying an elite in the field. Area, 36(3), 262–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dodge, M., & Geis, G. (2006). Fieldwork with the elite: Interviewing white-collar criminals. In D. Hobbs & R. Wright (Eds.), The Sage handbook of fieldwork (pp. 79–92). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Faria, R. (2018). Research misconduct as white-collar crime: A criminological approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farquharson, K. (2005). A different kind of snowball: Identifying key policymakers. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(4), 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Faugier, J., & Sargeant, M. (1997). Sampling hard to reach populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 790–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Goldstein, K. (2002). Getting in the door: Sampling and completing elite interviews. Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 669–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harvey, W. S. (2010). Methodological approaches for interviewing elites. Geography Compass, 4(3), 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Levi, M. (2015). Qualitative research on elite frauds, ordinary frauds, and “organized crime”. In H. Copes & J. M. Miller (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of qualitative criminology (pp. 215–235). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Lilleker, D. G. (2003). Interviewing the political elite: Navigating a potential minefield. Politics, 23(3), 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu, X. (2018). Interviewing elites. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Morrill, C., Buller, D. B., Buller, M. K., & Larkey, L. L. (1999). Toward an organizational perspective on identifying and managing formal gatekeepers. Qualitative Sociology, 22(1), 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Petintseva, O. (2018). Youth justice and migration: Discursive harms. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pires, A. (1997). Échantillonnage et recherche qualitative: Essai théorique et méthodologique. In J. Poupart, J.-P. Deslauriers, L.-H. Groulx, A. Laperrière, R. Mayer, & A. Pires (Eds.), La recherche qualitative. Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques (pp. 113–169). Montréal: Gaëtan Morin, Éditeur.Google Scholar
  22. Richards, D. (1996). Elite interviewing: Approaches and pitfalls. Politics, 16(3), 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Richardson, P. B. (2013). Engaging the Russian elite: Approaches, methods and ethics. Politics, 34(2), 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rivera, S. W., Kozyreva, P. M., & Sarovskii, E. G. (2003). Interviewing political elites: Lessons from Russia. Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 683–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sabot, E. C. (1999). Dr Jekyl, Mr H(i)de: The contrasting face of elites at interview. Geoforum, 30, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(2), 179–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., … Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1893–1907.Google Scholar
  28. Schreier, M. (2018). Sampling and generalization. In U. Flick (Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 84–97). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shapiro, S. (1980) cited in Levi, M. (2015). Qualitative research on elite frauds, ordinary frauds, and “organized crime”. In H. Copes & J. M. Miller (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of qualitative criminology (pp. 215–235). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Tieberghien, J., & Monaghan, M. (2017). Public scholarship and the evidence movement: Understanding and learning from Belgian drug policy development. European Journal of Criminology, 15(3), 278–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2007). Researching corporate and white-collar crime in an era of neo-liberalism. In H. N. Pontell & G. Geis (Eds.), International handbook of white-collar and corporate crime (pp. 125–184). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Welch, C., Marschan-Piekkari, R., Penttinen, H., & Tahvanainen, M. (2002). Corporate elites as informants in qualitative international business research. International Business Review, 11(5), 611–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zuckerman, H. (1972). Interviewing an ultra-elite. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminology, Criminal Law and Social LawGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Faculty of Law, School of CriminologyUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  3. 3.Department of Political Science and Public AdministrationVU University AmsterdamAmsterdam, North HollandThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations