Advertisement

What Remains? Human Rights After Death

  • Claire MoonEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with the human rights of the deceased victims of mass atrocity. It addresses these rights in the context of forensic anthropological work to establish the individual and collective identities of the victims. This work became historically and politically significant in the later decades of the 20th century in the context of attempts to determine the numbers, identities, and cause of death of victims of state crimes and violent conflict, return their bodies to family members, and contribute evidence to legal trials for crimes such as crimes against humanity, genocide, torture, and enforced disappearance. Key amongst these efforts were attempts to recover and establish the identities of the dead who were subjected to torture and enforced disappearance in Argentina in the mid-1980s, and ongoing efforts to return human remains to families of the dead in the former-Yugoslavia following the wars of the 1990s. Our moral obligations to the dead in these contexts beg a profound and comprehensive ethical approach. With this in mind, this chapter addresses two key questions: do these dead have human rights? And if so, which specific rights do they have? This chapter puts forward some provisional lines of enquiry and argumentation for consideration. It provides resources and evidence—historical, legal, and forensic—in support of such rights, and makes several suggestions regarding which rights might be developed with respect to the dead.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am very grateful to Kirsty Squires and Nick Márquez-Grant for their generous and thoughtful help during the writing process. I would especially like to thank Nick Márquez-Grant for his suggestions as to how the preservation of the dignity of human remains might translate further into forensic practice. I am also grateful to Ricardo Bravo (Héctor Ricardo Bravo Santillán) at the Centro de Docencia y Económicas (CIDE), Aguascalientes, México, for his comments on an earlier version of my argument, presented at CIDE in March 2018.

References

  1. Barnett, M. 2011. Empire of Humanity: A History of Humanitarianism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boddington, P. 1998. Organ Donation After Death—Should I Decide or Should My Family? Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1): 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brennan, M. 2018. Argentina’s Missing Bones: Revisiting the History of the Dirty War. Oakland: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Colibrí Centre. 2018. The Missing Migrant Project. http://www.colibricenter.org/. Accessed 28 May 2018.
  5. Cordner, S., R. Coninx, H. J. Kim, et al. (eds.). 2016. Management of Dead Bodies After Disasters: A Field Manual for Responders, 2nd ed. International Committee of the Red Cross, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Pan American Health Organization, World Health Organization, World Health Organization Regional Office of the Americas, Geneva.Google Scholar
  6. Douglas, M. [1966] 2002. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Dunant, H. [1862] 1959. A Memory of Solferino. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
  8. Durkheim, E. [1895] 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Durkheim, E. [1898] 1994. Social Facts. In Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, ed. M. Martin and L. McIntyre, 433–440. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Emson, H.E. 2003. It is Immoral to Require Consent for Cadaver Organ Donation. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3): 125–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Forsythe, D.P. 2005. The Humanitarians: The International Committee of the Red Cross. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. González Ruibal, A., and G. Moshenska (eds.). 2015. Ethics and the Archaeology of Violence. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Groen, W.J.M., R.C. Janaway, and N. Márquez-Grant. 2015. Forensic Archeology: A Global Perspective. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Hague Peace Conference. 1907. Hague Convention (IV) Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and Its Annex: Regulations Concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land. In International Peace Conference, The Hague, 18 October 1907.Google Scholar
  15. Harris, J. 2003. Organ Procurement: Dead Interests, Living Needs. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3): 130–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heinle, K., O.R. Ferreira, and D. Shirk. 2017. Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2016. San Diego: Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of San Diego.Google Scholar
  17. International Commission on Missing Persons. 2018. Missing Migrants Program for the Mediterranean Region. The Hague: International Commission on Missing Persons. https://www.icmp.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/12.1-Missing-Migrants-English.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2018.
  18. International Committee of the Red Cross. 1894. Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field, 22 August. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
  19. International Committee of the Red Cross. 1949a. Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Fourth Geneva Convention), 12 August. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
  20. International Committee of the Red Cross. 1949b. Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (Third Geneva Convention), 12 August. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
  21. International Committee of the Red Cross. 1977. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
  22. International Committee of the Red Cross. 2003. Progress Report: The Missing: Action to Resolve the Problem of People Unaccounted for as a Result of Armed Conflict or Internal Violence and to Assist Their Families. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
  23. International Committee of the Red Cross. 2004. Operational Best Practices Regarding the Management of Human Remains and Information on the Dead by Non-Specialists. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
  24. International Committee of the Red Cross. 2005. Customary International Humanitarian Law: Volume I Rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. International Committee of the Red Cross. 2006. The Missing: Action to Resolve the Problem of People Unaccounted for as a Result of Armed Conflict or Internal Violence and to Assist Their Families. ICRC Progress Report. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
  26. International Committee of the Red Cross. 2017. Missing Migrants. https://www.icrc.org/en/missing-migrants. Accessed 28 May 2018.
  27. Interpol. 1996. General Assembly on Disaster Victim Identification, 23–29 October. Lyon: Interpol.Google Scholar
  28. Johns, F. 2017. Data, Detection and the Redistribution of the Sensible in International Law. American Journal of International Law 111: 57–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kristeva, J. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Laqueur, T. 2002. The Dead Body and Human Rights. In The Body, ed. S.T. Sweeney and I. Hodder, 75–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Laqueur, T. 2015. The Work of the Dead: A Cultural History of Mortal Remains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Last Rights. 2018. Last Rights. http://lastrights.net/. Accessed 28 May 2018.
  33. Mauss, M. [1935] 1973. Techniques of the Body. Economy and Society 2 (1): 70–88.Google Scholar
  34. Mediterranean Missing. 2018. The Project. http://www.mediterraneanmissing.eu/. Accessed 28 May 2018.
  35. Moon, C. 2008. Narrating Political Reconciliation: South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  36. Moon, C. 2013. Interpreters of the Dead: Forensic Knowledge, Human Remains and the Politics of the Past. Social & Legal Studies 22 (2): 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moon, C. 2016. Human Rights, Human Remains: Forensic Humanitarianism and the Human Rights of the Dead. International Social Science Journal 65 (215–216): 49–63.Google Scholar
  38. Open Society Foundations. 2016. Undeniable Atrocities: Confronting Crimes Against Humanity in Mexico. New York: Open Society Foundations.Google Scholar
  39. Rosenblatt, A. 2010. International Forensic Investigations and the Human Rights of the Dead. Human Rights Q 32 (4): 922–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosenblatt, A. 2015. Digging for the Disappeared: Forensic Science After Atrocity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Savulescu, J. 2003. Death, Us and Our Bodies: Personal Reflections. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3): 127–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwartz-Marin, E., and A. Cruz-Santiago. 2016. Forensic Civism: Articulating Science, DNA and Kinship in Contemporary Mexico and Colombia. Human Remains and Violence 2 (1): 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smolensky, K.R. 2009. Rights of the Dead. Hofstra Law Review 37 (3): 763–803.Google Scholar
  44. Star, S.L., and J.R. Greisemer. 1989. Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’, and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tidball-Binz, M. 2012. For Whom the Bell Tolls: The Development of Humanitarian Forensic Action. Keynote Speech. Paper presented at Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 7 June 2012.Google Scholar
  46. United Nations. 1945. Charter of the United Nations. 24 October. San Francisco: United Nations.Google Scholar
  47. United Nations General Assembly. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  48. United Nations General Assembly. 1998. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Last Amended 2010). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  49. United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2016. Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  50. Wilson, R. 2001. The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the Post-Apartheid State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations