Advertisement

A 10-Step Design Process for Architectural Design Studios

  • Tarek Galal AbdelhamidEmail author
Conference paper
  • 29 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)

Abstract

In most architectural schools, Design Studios Architectural design is usually a process in which there is no clear methodology or scientific step-by-step process that should lead the student to a design acceptable to his instructors. This paper suggests a systematic method that reduces studio design to a clear process that should lead to what can be a better design output in a shorter time. This method is for beginner to intermediate level design studios. We will first describe and analyse the issue, then we will explain the proposed process in detail, then a brief report is given on implementation in five different case studies, ending with recommendations on how to make the best use of the process.

Keywords

Design education Design process Design methodology Architectural design Design techniques 

References

  1. Agha Khan. (1986). Architecture education in the Islamic World. Singapore: The Aga Khan Award for Architecture, Concept Media Pte. Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. AIACC. (2007). Integrated project delivery: A guide. AIA, AIACC.Google Scholar
  3. AIAS. (2002). The redesign of studio culture, a report of the AIAS studio culture task force. The American Institute of Architects Students (AIAS) 2002.Google Scholar
  4. AIAS. (2008). Toward an evolution of studio culture, a report of the second aias task force on studio culture. The American Institute of Architects Students (AIAS) 2008; Studio Culture: Stories and Interpretations, AIAS Advocacy Advisory Group 2015–2016.Google Scholar
  5. Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Almagor, A. (2016). Mixed reality for the AEC industry extending Trimble’s product capabilities with microsoft HoloLens Aviad Almagor, Trimble White Paper. (http://buildings.trimble.com/sites/buildings.trimble.com/files/white_papers/Trimble_White_Paper_Mixed_Reality_for_The_AEC_Industry.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2018.
  7. Al-Qawasmi, J., & de Velasco, G. V. (Eds.). (2006). Changing trends in architectural design education. In The International Conference of the Center for the Study of Architecture in the Arab Region (CSAAR 2006).Google Scholar
  8. Angulo, A. (2015). Rediscovering virtual reality in the education of architectural design: The immersive simulation of spatial experiences. Ambiances [En ligne], Experiential Simulation, mis en ligne le 08 septembre 2015. http://ambiances.revues.org/594. Accessed October 25, 2018.
  9. Archer, B. (1965). Systematic method for designers. London: Council for Industrial Design.Google Scholar
  10. Architecture Education in the Islamic World. (1986). The Aga Khan Award for architecture. Singapore: Concept Media Pte. Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Asfour, K. (2011). Developing Techniques in Problem Based Learning for Design Studios, 1st International Congress: Architectural Design Between Teaching and Research Proceeding, Claudio D’Amato editor, First International Congress of Retevitruvio, Italian Interuniversity Network Of Architectural Design. (pp. 1495–1500).Google Scholar
  12. Barrada, A. (1986). Architectural education in Egypt. Architecture education in the Islamic World, The Aga Khan Award for architecture (pp. 183–195). Singapore: Concept Media Pte. Ltd.Google Scholar
  13. Bas Leurs. (2014). Design theory lecture. http://www.slideshare.net/Leursism/design-theory-lecture-02, April 17, 2014, Accessed October 15, 2018.
  14. Bashier, F. (2014). Reflections on architectural design education: The return of rationalism in the studio. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3, 424–430. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095263514000491, Accessed October 30, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bayazit, N. (2004). Investigating design: A review of forty years of design research. Design Issues, 20(1), 16–30 (Winter 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brawne, M. (2003). Architectural thought: The design process and the expectant eye (p. 83). Oxford: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  17. Broadbent, G. (1973a). Methodology in the service of delight. Environmental Design Research, 2, 314–318.Google Scholar
  18. Broadbent, G. (1973b). Design in architecture. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21 (Spring 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Busby Perkins. (2007). Will Stantec consulting, roadmap for the integrated design process. http://www.greenspacencr.org/events/IDProadmap.pdf. Accessed October 22, 2018.
  21. Chakradeo, U. (2010). Design pedagogy-a tested path. Archnet-IJAR, 4(2–3), 107–115.Google Scholar
  22. Christiaans, H. H. C. M. (2002). Creativity as a design criterion. Creativity Research Journal, 14(1), 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cornell University, Department of Architecture Studio Culture Policy. (undated). https://aap.cornell.edu/sites/default/files/arch-studio-culture-policy-081513.pdf. Accessed October 30, 2018.
  24. Cross, N. (1984). The study of the principles, practices and procedures of design in a rather broad and general sense. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (p. vii). Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Cross, N. (1993). A history of design methodology. In M. J. de Vries, et al. (Eds.), Design methodology and relationships with science (pp. 15–27). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cross, N. (2006). Forty years of design research. Design Research Quarterly, 1, 3–5.Google Scholar
  27. De Graaff, E., & Banerjee, H. K. (1996). Problem-based learning in architecture: Problems of integration of technical disciplines. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), 185–195.Google Scholar
  28. de Vries, M. J., Cross, N., & Grant, D. P. (2013). Design methodology and relationships with science (pp. 72–74). Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  29. Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X01000096. Accessed October 23, 2018.
  30. Draisma, E. (2012). The design process in twelve steps. http://www.eibertdraisma.nl/data/Downloads_Files/Design_process_in_twelve_steps.pdf. Accessed October 30, 2018.
  31. Draper, J. (1977). The Ecole des Beax-Arts and the architectural profession in the United States: The case of John Galen Howard. In S. Kostof (Ed.), The architect, chapters in the history of the profession (pp. 209–237). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Dubberly, H. (2004). How do you design? A compendium of models. San Francisco: Dubberly Design Office.Google Scholar
  33. Duerk, D. P. (1993). Architectural programming—Information management for design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  34. El Nachar, E., Radwan, A. H., & Safey Eldeen, H. (2008). Architectural education: What really goes on and what ought to be done? In The International Scientific Conference. The Faculty of Fine Arts Centennial, 19–22, October, 1–5. http://www.cpas-egypt.com/pdf/Ahmed_Hosny_Radwan/R/001.pdf. Accessed October 30, 2018.
  35. Farghaly, Y. A. (2006). Student’s creativity between traditional and digital methods in design studio. In J. Al-Qawasmi & G. Vasquez de Velasco (Eds.), Changing Trends in Architectural Design Education, The International Conference of the Center for the Study of Architecture in the Arab Region (CSAAR 2006), CSAAR (pp. 333–344).Google Scholar
  36. Fawcett, A. P. (2003). Architecture: Design notebook. Oxford: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  37. Fraser, I., & Henmi, R. (1994). Envisioning architecture—An analysis of drawing. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  38. Gero, J. S. (1997). Concept formation in design: Towards a loosely wired brain model. In L. Candy & K. Hori (Eds.), Strategic Knowledge and Concept Formation Workshop (pp. 135–146). Loughborough: Loughborough University of Technology.Google Scholar
  39. Goldschmidt, G. (1992). Serial sketching: Visual problem solving in designing. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 23, 191–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goldshmidt, G., Hochman, H., & Dafni, I. (2010). The design studio “crit”: Teacher–student communication. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24, 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Graves, M. (1997). The necessity for drawing: Tangible speculation. Architectural Design, 6(77), 384–394.Google Scholar
  42. Herbert, D. M. (1993). Architectural study drawings. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  43. Hill, C. (2007). Climate in the interior design studio: Implications for design education. Journal of Interior Design, 33(2), 38–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. IBM. (2011). Watson—A system design for answer, the future of workload optimized systems design, IBM systems and technology, February 2011. http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=SA&subtype=WH&htmlfid=POW03061USEN. Accessed October 30, 2018.
  45. Ismail, A. M., & Soliman, M. H. (2010). Integrating multi-grade collaborative learning pedagogy into design studios. Archnet-IJAR, 4(2–3), 201–215.Google Scholar
  46. Jones, J. C. (1970). Design methods: Seeds of human futures. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Jones, J. C. (1984). A method of systematic design. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 9–31). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  48. Jones, J. C. (1992). Design methods. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Larsson, N. (2004). The integrated design process, international initiative for a sustainable built environment (iiSBE), Ottawa 2004. http://iisbe.org/down/gbc2005/Other_presentations/IDP_overview.pdf. Accesses October 25, 2018.
  50. Laseau, P. (2001). Graphic thinking for architects & designers (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Lawson, B. (1980). How designers think. London: The Architectural Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  52. Levin, P. H. (1966a). The design process in planning: An exploratory study. The Town Planning Review, 37(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Levin, P. H. (1966b). Decision making in urban design (Vol. 49). Building Research Current Papers, Building Research Station.Google Scholar
  54. Lidy, C. J. (2006). A study of landscape architecture design methods. Unpublished MA Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
  55. Luckman, J. (1967). An approach to the management of design. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 18(4), 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mahgoub, Y. (2012). Architectural design methods. http://ymahgoub.blogspot.com.eg/2012/06/blog-post_04.html. Accessed October 30, 2018.
  57. Mahmoodi, A. S. M. (2001). The design process in architecture (pp. 15–16). Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds, School of Civil Engineering, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  58. Mcallister, K. (2010). The design process-making it relevant for students. Archnet-IJAR, 4(2–3), 76–89.Google Scholar
  59. Mills, C. B. (2005). Designing with Models: a studio guide to architectural process models, John Wiley & Sons. Using models is a basic part of design studios in several universities, like: City University of Hong Kong. (https://www.cityu.edu.hk/ug/201415/course/CA19201.pdf).
  60. Nabih, H. E. (2010). Process-based learning: Towards theoretical and lecture-based coursework in studio style. Archnet-IJAR, 4(2–3), 90–106.Google Scholar
  61. Nassar, K., Mostafa, M., & Rifki, A. (2010). Visualization skills for the new architectural forms. Archnet-IJAR, 4(2–3), 346.Google Scholar
  62. Oxman, R. (1995). The reflective eye: Visual reasoning in design. In A. Koutamanis, H. Timmermans, & I. Vermeulen (Eds.), Visual databases in architecture (pp. 89–111). Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  63. Rittel, H., & Webber, M. W. (1973). Dilemmans in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Robbins, E. (1994). Why architects draw. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  65. Sachs, A. (1999). ‘Stuckness’ in the design studio. Design Studies, 20, 195–209 (Elsevier Science Ltd.). https://slidedocument.org/stuckness-in-the-design-studio. Accessed October 25, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Salama, A. (1995). New trends in architectural education: Designing the design studio. USA: Raleigh, N.C.Google Scholar
  67. Salama, A. (2005). A process oriented design pedagogy: KFUPM sophomore studio. CEBE Transactions, 2(2), 19–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Salama, A. M., Amir, A. O. (2005). Paradigmatic trends in Arab architectural education: Impacts and challenges. For UIA Congress 2005, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
  69. Salingaros, N. A., & Masden, K. G., II. (2010). Teaching design at the limits of architecture. Archnet-IJAR, 4(2–3), 19–31.Google Scholar
  70. Sanoff, H. (2000). Community participation methods in design and planning. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  71. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books Inc.Google Scholar
  72. SFMOMA. (2011). SFMOMA presents less and more: The design ethos of dieter rams. https://www.sfmoma.org/press/release/sfmoma-presents-less-and-more-the-design-ethos-of/. Accessed October 30, 2018.
  73. Shih, Y. T., Sher, W. D., & Taylor, M. (2015). Understanding creative design processes by integrating sketching and CAD modelling design environments: A preliminary protocol result from architectural designers. Archnet-IJAR, 9(3), 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Smith, C. A., & Boyer, M. E. (2015). Adapted verbal feedback, instructor interaction and student emotions in the landscape architecture studio. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 34, 260–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thorp-Lancaster, D. (2016). Sketchup viewer is the windows store’s first commercial Hololens app. https://www.windowscentral.com/sketchup-viewer-windows-stores-first-commercial-hololens-app. Accessed October 30, 2018.
  76. Trimble. (2016). Trimble news release, Trimble partners with microsoft to bring Microsoft HoloLens wearable holographic technology to the AEC industry. http://www.trimble.com/news/release.aspx?id=042915a. Accessed October 30, 2018.
  77. Turnipseed, S. (2016). Design programming. Southern Illinois University-Carbondale. http://architecture.siu.edu/_common/documents/syllabi/fall/id-361.pdf. Accessed October 30, 2018 (Fall 2016).
  78. von Meiss, P. (2002). Teaching between architects and engineers, the challenge of humanity’s decent survival. In A. M. A. Salama, W. O’Reilly, & K. Noschis (Eds.), Architectural education today: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 85–90), 8th Architecture & Behaviour Colloquium, Lausanne 2002, Comportements, Lausanne.Google Scholar
  79. Wallis, L., Williams, T., & Ostwald, M. (2009). Sustaining the studio: A snapshot of academics’ perceptions towards studio in 2007. In Sustainable Theory/Theorizing Sustainability, Proceedings from the 5th International Conference of the Association of Architecture, Victoria University, New Zealand, September 4–5, 2009.Google Scholar
  80. Wright, A. (2011). Critical method: A pedagogy of design education, design principles and practices. An International Journal, 5(6), 109–122.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), Sixth of OctoberGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations