“Einstein” as a Grammatical Illusion

  • Sal Restivo


This chapter introduces the rationale for challenging the view of Einstein as an icon and genius. We, along with Einstein and others, have made a mistake in reference. The tendency has been to view him as a unique individual and to look to genes and neurons (and more broadly biology) to explain his uniqueness. The label “genius” adds a divine factor to the explanatory narrative. I do not suggest that we deny his uniqueness but that we situate it socially, culturally, and historically. From the vantage point of social science, “Einstein” is defined by the particular configuration of social networks he engaged as his life unfolded. The chapter also previews the following chapters on brains, self, and genius.


Brain Genius Culture Network Self 


  1. Bagnoli, M., H.A. Klein, C.G. Mann, and J. Robinson, eds. 2010. Treasures of Heaven: Saints, Relics, and Devotion in Medieval Europe. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, P. 2011. Did Einstein Discover E=mc2? (/E=mc2/HistoryOfE=mC2A.webarchive).Google Scholar
  3. Beretta, M., M. Confori, and P. Mazzarello, eds. 2016. Savant Relics: Brains and Remains of Scientists. Sagamore Beach, MA: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Bodanis, D. 2009. E = mc2: A Biography of the World’s Most Famous Equation. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, R. 1971/1984. Einstein: The Life and Times. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
  6. Collins, R., and S. Restivo. 1983. Robber Barons and Politicians in Mathematics: A Conflict Model of Science. The Canadian Journal of Sociology 8 (2): 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corry, L., Jürgen Renn, and John Stachel. 1997. Belated Decision in the Hilbert-Einstein Priority Dispute. Science 278 (5341): 1270–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox, B., and J. Forshaw. 2009. Why Does E=mc2? Boston: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cruz, J.C. 1984. Relics. Huntington, IN: Our Sunday Visitor.Google Scholar
  10. Doyle, N. 2018. Gertrude Stein and the Domestication of Genius in The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas. Feminist Studies 44 (1): 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gardner, S. 2009. Nietzsche, the Self, and the Disunity of Philosophical Reason. In Nietzsche on Freedom and Autonomy, ed. Ken Gemes and Simon May, 1–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Guicciardini, N. 1999. Reading the Principia: The Debate on Newton’s Mathematical Methods for Natural Philosophy from 1687–1736. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gumplowicz, L. 1980. The Outlines of Sociology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1980; orig. publ. in German, 1885.Google Scholar
  14. Hessen, B. 1931. The Social and Economic Roots of Newton’s Principia. In Science at the Crossroads, ed. N.I. Bukharin et al., 151–212. London: Frank Cass and Company.Google Scholar
  15. Isaacson, W. 2008. Einstein: His Life and Universe. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  16. Johnston, H. 2009. Newton’s Wars. Everyday Science/Blog, September.
  17. Kalb, C. 2017. What Makes a Genius? National Geographic 231 (5): 30–55.Google Scholar
  18. Koberlein, B. 2017. The History of Einstein’s Most Famous Equation.
  19. Lepore, F.E. 2018. Finding Einstein’s Brain. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  20. McMahon, D.M. 2013. Divine Fury: A History of Genius. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, A.I. 2001. Einstein, Picasso: Space, Time, and the Beauty That Causes Havoc. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Paterniti, M. 2000. Driving Mr. Albert: A Trip Across America with Einstein’s Brain. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
  23. Perelman, B. 1994. The Trouble With Genius: Reading Pound, Joyce, Stein, and Zukovsky. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rathore, H. 2018. Why Did Einstein Use Speed of Light Squared in the Famous Equation E = mc2?
  25. Restivo, Sal. 1975. Towards a Sociology of Objectivity. Sociological Analysis and Theory 5 (2): 155–183.Google Scholar
  26. Restivo, S. 2018. The Age of the Social: The Discovery of Society and the Ascendance of a New Episteme. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rothman, T. 2015. Was Einstein the First to Invent E = mc2?(/E=mc2/Was%20Einstein%20the%20First%20to%20Invent%20E%20=%20mc2%3F%20-%20Scientific%20American.webarchive).Google Scholar
  28. Shapin, S. 1981. Licking Leibniz. History of Science 19: 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sonar, T. 2018. The History of the Priority Dispute Between Newton and Leibniz: Mathematics in History and Culture. Cham, Switzerland: Birkhäuser, orig. in German, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Westfall, R.S. 1980. Newton’s Marvelous Years of Discovery and Their Aftermath. ISIS 71: 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Whittaker, E. 1989. The History of the Theories of Aether & Electricity, Vols. 1 & 2. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications; orig. publ. 1951–1953.Google Scholar
  32. Winterberg, F. 2006. Response to Cory-Renn-Stachel. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 59a: 715–719.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sal Restivo
    • 1
  1. 1.RidgewoodUSA

Personalised recommendations