Advertisement

Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Residential Building Modeled Using Ruaumoko2D Program

  • A. G. Kay DoraEmail author
  • J. Mohd Safwan
  • J. Nurjuhanah
  • R. N. Mohamed
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 53)

Abstract

Earthquake is one of the natural disaster that cannot be avoided and could give great impact to the world and living things on it. Malaysia is located nearby two seismically active plate boundaries which are between Indo-Australian and Eurasian Plate on the west and between Eurasian and Philippine Plate on the east. Earthquake that happen along these boundaries could cause tremors in Malaysia. East Malaysia especially Sabah also experienced earthquakes from nearby countries. However, Peninsular of Malaysia is considered as low seismic region in Asia. Therefore, majority of buildings in Peninsular Malaysia had been designed by using British Standard Code of Practice which lack of seismic detailing and inadequate consideration of seismic loading during the design process. To secure the human life and increase the building safety, this study aimed to model the structural damage and assessing the seismic performance of five-storey reinforced concrete residential building located in Pulau Pinang, Malaysia which is still in the stage of planning, when subjected to peak ground acceleration of 0.12 g by using Ruaumoko2D and its associated program. The modeling results showed that the structural damages would occurs at the ground and first floor beam-column joints. The displacement ductility valued below 2 proved that the prototype building is vulnerable when subjected to seismic excitation. The maximum lateral strength, maximum lateral displacement and stiffness of the prototype building were also discussed in this paper. The findings of this study could help the engineer to make further improvement by incorporating seismic factor in the building design.

Keywords

Seismic performance Peak ground acceleration Ruaumoko2d Non-seismic structural design Displacement ductility Stiffness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Pulau Pinang; Sungai Petani Municipal Council and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia for providing the research materials and expertise for data analysis. Special thanks to The Ministry of Education Malaysia for their financial and support for the publication processes via research grant FRGS/1/2018/TK01/UiTM/02/26.

References

  1. 1.
    Gill NS (2015) Tectonic motion of Malaysia: analysis from years 2001 to 2013. ISPRS Ann 2/W2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shugo Takano TS (2017) Analysis of a school building damaged by the 2015 Ranau earthquake Malaysia. AIP Conf Proc 1892:120004Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abas MR (2001) Earthquake monitoring in Malaysia. In: Seismic risk seminar, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sharma D (2017) Earthquake load comparison on different shape of high rise building. Int J Eng Technol Sci Res 4(5)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roselli M (2011) The lateral forces of earthquake. Retrieved 5 Nov 2017, from http://www.mikeroselli.net/the-lateral-forces-of-earthquakes/
  6. 6.
    Potty NS, Sirajuddin M (2011) Assessment of buildings for seismic resistance. Malays J Civ Eng 23(1):86–104Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Carillo J, Rubiano A, Gonzalez G (2014) Displacement ductility for seismic design of RC walls for low-rise housing. Lat Am J Solids Struct 11(4):725–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ASCE (2000) FEMA 356 prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. ASCE for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhao X, Wu YF, Leung AY, Lam HF (2011) Plastic hinge length in reinforced concrete flexural members. Procedia Eng 14:1266–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Papadopoulos PG, Hariton X, Panos L, Andreas D, Periklis L, Yannis A (2012) Achievements of truss models for reinforced concrete structures. Open J Civ Eng 2:125–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2012.23018. Published Online Sept 2012. http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ojceCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    BS8110: Part 1 (1997) Structural use of concrete, part I: code of practice for design and construction. British Standards Institution, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    BS EN (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kay Dora AG, Tukiar MA, Hamid NH (2017) Assessment of precast beam-column using capacity demand response spectrum subject to design basis earthquake and maximum considered earthquake. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol 1875, pp 030010. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4998382
  15. 15.
    Cheok GS, Lew HS (1993) Model precast beam-to-column connections subject to cyclic loading. PCI J 38(4):80–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. G. Kay Dora
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Mohd Safwan
    • 2
  • J. Nurjuhanah
    • 1
  • R. N. Mohamed
    • 3
  1. 1.Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau PinangPermatang PauhMalaysia
  2. 2.Sungai Petani Municipal CouncilSungai PetaniMalaysia
  3. 3.Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaJohor BahruMalaysia

Personalised recommendations