Advertisement

Morphometric Analysis of Galal Bedrah River Basin Using STRM (DEM) Data and GIS Techniques

  • Mohammed S. ShamkhiEmail author
  • Atyaf J. Mohson
  • Tabark J. Abdullah
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 53)

Abstract

A morphometric analysis of Galal Bedrah river basin was carried out by several processes that take place on STRM DEM (Shuttle Rader Topography mission), thereby employing the Spatial Analysis tool in Arc GIS (version 10.5) software for analyzing the study area. Primarily, the Arc GIS software was the basic tool used for extracting the river Basin as well as its drainage network. Upon analyzing, the drainage network was classified using Strahler’s System for classification, which in turn reveals that the drainage pattern is almost dendritic, with the basin order being fifth-order. The study further evaluates the morphometric parameter and its influence on soil physical, landform, and other hydrologic characteristics. The mean bifurcation ratio (Rbm) was found to be 2.35 that have a strong effect on the runoff and its intensity, high relief value, drainage density, and stream frequency. All these values indicate that the basin exhibits erosion and sediment transfer and play a significant role in different hydrological studies.

Keywords

Morphometric characteristics Galal bedrah Watershed Iraq Digital elevation model (DEM) GIS 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Global Edico office for its professional assistance in language and grammar editing.

References

  1. 1.
    Angillieri MYE (2008) Morphometric analysis of Colangüil river basin and flash flood hazard, San Juan, Argentina. Environ Geol 55(1):107–111Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banerjee A, Singh P, Pratap K (2017) Morphometric evaluation of Swarnrekha watershed, Madhya Pradesh, India: an integrated GIS-based approach. Appl Water Sci 7(4):1807–1815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chitra C, Alaguraja P, Ganeshkumari K, Yuvaraj D, Manivel M (2011) Watershed characteristics of Kundah sub basin using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int J Geomatics Geosci 2:311Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Farr TG, Kobrick M (2000) Shuttle radar topography mission produces a wealth of data. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 81:583–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gajbhiye S, Mishra SK, Pandey A (2014) Prioritizing erosion-prone area through morphometric analysis: an RS and GIS perspective. Appl Water Sci 4:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grohmann CH, Riccomini C, Alves FM (2007) SRTM-based morphotectonic analysis of the Poços de Caldas Alkaline Massif, Southeastern Brazil. Comput Geosci 33:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar R, Kumar S, Lohani AK, Nema RK, Singh RD (2000) Evaluation of geomorphological characteristics of a catchment using GIS. GIS India 9:13–17Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N, Soundranayagam JP (2011) Morphometric evaluation of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India: a GIS approach. Environ Earth Sci 64:373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Magesh NS, Jitheshlal KV, Chandrasekar N, Jini KV (2013) Geographical information system-based morphometric analysis of Bharathapuzha river basin, Kerala, India. Appl Water Sci 3:467–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mesa LM (2006) Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean basin (Tucuman, Argentina). Environ Geol 50:1235–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rai PK, Mohan K, Mishra S, Ahmad A, Mishra VN (2017) A GIS-based approach in drainage morphometric analysis of Kanhar River Basin, India. Appl Water Sci 7(1):217–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reddy GPO, Maji AK, Gajbhiye KS (2004) Drainage morphometry and its influence on landform characteristics in a basaltic terrain, Central India–a remote sensing and GIS approach. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 6:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Singh P, Thakur JK, Singh UC (2013) Morphometric analysis of Morar River Basin, Madhya Pradesh, India, using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Environ Earth Sci 68:1967–1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sreedevi PD, Sreekanth PD, Khan HH, Ahmed S (2013) Drainage morphometric and its influence on hydrology in a semi-arid region: using SRTM data and GIS. Environ Earth Sci 70:839–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sreedevi PD, Subrahmanyam K, Ahmed S (2005) The significance of morphometric analysis for obtaining groundwater potential zones in a structurally controlled terrain. Environ Geol 47:412–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Srivastava OS, Denis DM, Srivastava SK, Kumar M, Kumar N (2014) Morphometric analysis of a semi urban watershed, trans Yamuna, draining at Allahabad using Cartosat (DEM) data and GIS. Int J Eng Sci 3:71–79Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Strahler AN (1964) Part II. Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Handbook of applied hydrology: McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 4–39Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Zyl JJ (2001) The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM): a breakthrough in remote sensing of topography. Acta Astronaut 48(5–12):559–565Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vieceli N, Bortolin TA, Mendes LA, Bacarim G, Cemin G, Schneider VE (2015) Morphometric evaluation of watersheds in Caxias do Sul City, Brazil, using SRTM (DEM) data and GIS. Environ Earth Sci 73:5677–5685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Waikar ML, Nilawar AP (2014) Morphometric analysis of a drainage basin using geographical information system: a case study. Int J Multi Current Res 2:179–184Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilson JJ, Ch N (2012) Morphometric analysis of major sub-watersheds in Aiyar & Karai Pottanar Basin, Central Tamil Nadu, India Using Remote Sensing & GIS Techniques. Bonfring Int J Ind Eng Manag Sci 2 (Special Issue Special Issue on Geospatial Technology Development in Natural Resource and Disaster Management):08–15‏Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammed S. Shamkhi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Atyaf J. Mohson
    • 1
  • Tabark J. Abdullah
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringWasit UniversityWasitIraq

Personalised recommendations