Advertisement

The Influence of Communication on the Success Design of High-Rise Residential Building on Surabaya

  • D. ListyaningsihEmail author
  • C. Utomo
  • M. A. Rohman
Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 53)

Abstract

The success of a construction project depends on the successful design. The approach in building design considers to create more sustainable designs. However, designers face several factors that reduce the success rate of the design, that are the design model and the method used. One of the ways to manage this problem is combining all information and systems for the best design. This study analyzes the influence of communication among stakeholder in design process, to the successful design of building design. Data was collected by distributing questionnaires to 37 respondents from design consultants in Surabaya who involved in several building design. Furthermore, a correlation analysis is conducted to analyze the effect of communication on a successful design. The result is verified by interview. The results of the analysis found that communication does not significantly affect to the successful design. The findings of this study are expected to give more benefits to design actors, so the successful design will be increased.

Keywords

Communication Project Successful design 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The activity presented in the paper is part of the research grant and fellow ship from “Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, Direktorat Jenderal Penguatan Riset dan Pengembangan, Kementrian Riset Dikti, 2019”.

References

  1. 1.
    Blizzard L, Klotz E (2012) A framework for sustainable whole system design. Des Stud 33:456–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cabrera D, Colosi L, Lobdell C (2007) System thinking. Eval Progr Plann 31:299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cangara H (2016) Komunikasi Politik: Konsep, Teori dan Strategi. Rajawali PersGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cash PJ, Hartlev CG (2016) Behavioural design: a process for integrating behaviour change and design. Des Stud 48:96–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ceric A (2014) Minimizing communication risk in construction: a delphi study of the key role of project managers. J Civil Eng Manag 20:829–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Charnley F, Lemon M, Evans S (2010) Exploring the process of whole system design. Des Stud 32:156–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chiu M (2002) An organizational view of design communication in design collaboration. Des Stud 23:187–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dong A (2005) The latent semantic approach to studying design team communication. Des Stud 26:445–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eves C, Kippes S (2010) Public awareness of “green” and “energy efficient” residential property. Property Manage 28(3):193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Excel CN (2012) Satisfaction assessment in construction projects: a conceptual framework. Built Environ Project Asset Manag 2:86–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fraczkowski K, Gladysz B, Mazur H, Pralat E (2019) Behavioral aspects of communication in the management process of IT projects. In: 39th international conference on information systems architecture and technology, Nysa, Poland, 16–18 SeptGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gabriel GC, Maher ML (2002) Coding and modelling communication in architectural collaborative design. Autom Constr 11(2):199–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hartman A, Hietbrink M (2012) An explorative Study on the Relationship Between Stakeholder Expectation, Experience and Satisfaction in Road Maintenance. Proceedings of engineering project organizations conference.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hossain L (2009) Communications and coordination in construction projects. Constr Manag Econ 27:25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kadefors A, Bjorlingson E, Karlsson A (2007) Procuring service innovations: contractor selection for partnering projects. Int J Project Manage 25:375–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leenders RTAJ, Engelen JML, Kratzer J (2003) Virtuality communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective. J Eng Tech Manag 20:69–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lindsjorn Y, Dingsoyr T, Bergersen GR (2016) Teamwork quality and project success in software development: a survey of agile development teams. J Syst Softw 122:274–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mahato BK, Ogunlana SO (2011) Conflict dynamic in a dam construction project: a case study. Built Environ Project Asset Manag 1:176–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mesthrige Jayantha W, Sze Man W (2013) Effect of green labelling on residential property price: a case study in Hong Kong. J Facil Manage 11(1):31–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Olanrewaju A, Tan SY, Kwan LF (2017) Roles of communication on performance of the construction sector. Proc Creative Constr Conf 2017(196):763–770Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Olaniran HF (2015) On the role of communication in construction project in Nigeria. Int J Sci Technol Res 4:129–131Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ping C, Keung C, Ramanathan M (2011) Integrated team design process—successful stories of Hong Kong MTR corporation projects. Proc Eng 14:1190–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pinto MB, Pinto JK (1990) Project team communication and cross-functional cooperation in new program development. J Prod Innov Manage 7(3):200–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rahman IA, Gamil Y (2018) Identification of causes and effects of poor communication in construction industry: a theoretical review. Emerg Sci J 1:239–247Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rahmawati Y, Utomo C, Zawawi NAWA (2019) BIM and E-Negotiation Practices in AEC Consulting Businesses. Sustainability 11, 1911Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Soyomukti N (2016) Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. Ar-ruz MediaGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stingl V, Geraldi J (2017) Errors, lies and misunderstandings: systematic review on behavioural decision making in projects. Int J Project Manag 35:121–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stray V, Dyba T, Sjoberg KID (2016) The daily standup meeting: a grounded theory study. J Syst Softw 144:101–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thoha M (2015) Perilaku Organisasi: Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya, 1st edn. Raja Grafindo PersadaGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tipili LG, Ojeba PO, Ilyasu MS (2014) Evaluating the effects of communication in construction project delivery in Nigeria. Global J Environ Sci Technol 2:48–54Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Winardi (2015) Manajemen Perilaku Organisasi, Prenadamedia GrupGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wright HM, Thomson DS, Austin SA (2003) Matching values and value in construction design. In: Proceedings of the 3rd conference of the environmental psychology in the UK network. Robert Gordon University, Loughborough, pp 42–51Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember SukoliloSurabayaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations

Cite paper

Buy options