Is Mediation Too “Feminine” for Him? Men and Masculinity During Mediation Communication
Few studies focusing on conflict resolution and communication explore how mediation affects male participants. Applying research on masculine and male studies, this article identifies how the mediation process itself may alienate, intimidate, or offend participants by virtue of their gender identity, regardless of the gender of the mediator(s). The article concludes by providing insights and tactics for mediators who wish to encourage male participants to communicate more actively, fully, and honestly in order to conclude the mediation process with a greater sense of fairness for all.
KeywordsAlternative dispute resolution Gender Sexuality Mediation Divorce
- Brizendine, L. (2010). The male brain. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
- Butler, B. H. (2010). Gendered discourse in the confessionalists and new journalists (Doctoral dissertation). Department of English and Language Arts, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
- Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Coates, J. (1996). Women talk. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Dijk, T. V. (1985). Handbook of discourse analysis: Dimensions of discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Ekman, P. (2001). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
- Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: A critical study of language. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Holmes, J. (2013). Women, men, and politeness. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kimmell, M. (2008). Guyland. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and a woman’s place: Studies in language and gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Maltz, D., & Borker, R. (1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In L. Monaghan, J. E. Goodman, & J. M. Robinson (Eds.), A cultural approach to interpersonal communication: Essential readings. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar
- Rajmohan, V., & Mohandas, E. (2007). Mirror neuron system. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 49(1), 66–69. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900004/.
- Spender, D. (1980). Man made language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Thomas, C. (2013, July 19). Emotional empathy and cognitive empathy. Blog—Teleos Leadership Institute. Available at: http://blog.teleosleaders.com/2013/07/19/emotional-empathy-and-cognitive-empathy/.
- Tiger, L. (1971). Men in groups. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
- Tiger, L. (1999). The decline of males: The first look at an unexpected new world for men and women. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.Google Scholar