Mind the Gap: Commentary on Session XXV

  • Gautam Basu Thakur
Part of the The Palgrave Lacan Series book series (PALS)


Using the absent beginning of the session as shorthand this commentary seeks to explore the pedagogical possibility of this textual lack for understanding Lacan’s explication of the relation between anxiety and desire.


  1. Chiesa, Lorenzo. 2007. Subjectivity and Otherness: A Philosophical Reading of Lacan. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Edelman, Lee. 2017. “Learning Nothing: Bad Education.” Differences, 28 (1): 124–173.Google Scholar
  3. Fink, Bruce. 2016. Transference: Lacan on Love. An Exploration of Lacan’s Seminar VIII. Cambridge, U.K./Malden, MA.: Polity.Google Scholar
  4. Lacan, Jacques. 1981. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI (1973). Translated by A. Sheridan. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1988. Freud’s Papers on Technique 1953–1954. Seminar Book I (1975). Translated by John Forrester. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2014. Anxiety: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book X (2004). Translated by A. R. Price. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2015. Transference: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VIII. Edited by Jacques-Alain Miller and Translated by Bruce Fink. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  8. Rose, Jacqueline. 2003. “The Imaginary.” In Jacques Lacan: Critical Evaluations in Cultural Theory, vol. I, ed. Slavoj Žižek. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Shepherdson, Charles. 2001. “Foreword.” To Roberto Harari’s Lacan’s Seminar on Anxiety: An Introduction. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gautam Basu Thakur
    • 1
  1. 1.Boise State UniversityBoiseUSA

Personalised recommendations