Between Socrates and Alcibiades: Commentary on Session XI

  • Zachary TavlinEmail author
Part of the The Palgrave Lacan Series book series (PALS)


This commentary asks (again): what is the ágalma, and in the context of this session what does Alcibiades recognize in Socrates that qualifies to the label of agalma? Alcibiades—as Lacan writes in the previous chapter—“rips us away from the dialectic of beauty that had, up until then, served as the pathway, guide, or mode of capture along the pathway of the desirable” (138). For it is what’s inside the other that matters, not what presses in from the great beyond, which Alcibiades believes is precisely Socrates’ confusion and even inhibition, as he always moves from the singular to the general, from the hidden gem to the big idea, from passionate attachment to reasonable affection.


  1. Fink, Bruce. 2016. Lacan on Love: An Exploration of Lacan’s Seminar VIII, Transference. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Giraudoux, Jean. 1938. Amphitryon 38 (1929). Trans. S.N. Behrman. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  3. Lacan, Jacques. 2006. The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire. In Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English (2006), translated by Bruce Fink. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2015. Transference: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VIII. Edited by Jacques-Alain Miller and Translated by Bruce Fink. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  5. Leadbeater, Lewis W. 1978. Classical Themes in Giraudoux’ Amphitryon 38. Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature 32.4: 222–233.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Liberal ArtsSchool of the Art Institute of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations