Advertisement

Ombudsman as a Global Institution

  • Tero ErkkiläEmail author
Chapter
  • 22 Downloads
Part of the Public Sector Organizations book series (PSO)

Abstract

This chapter examines the ombudsman as a global institution and presents the theory, methodology and research design of the book. The ombudsman institution has spread globally, covering all regions and most independent states. The chapter outlines the existing literature on the ombudsman institution concerning the institution’s development and patterns of diffusion. The chapter argues that along with the spread of the institution, its institutional development has also become global, meaning that its national instances are increasingly involved in transnational processes, where the institution is being shaped. The new institutionalist framework presented provides insights for understanding both continuity and change in the institutional evolution of the ombudsman. The sociological variant of institutional analysis provides a basis for understanding the global dissemination of institutional ideas, its cultural aspects and rationalities, which are also identified in the global spread of the ombudsman institution. There are also clear ideational changes around the institution: the ombudsman institution has been shifting between the semantic fields of administrative law, human rights and good governance. This has influenced its institutional development. The chapter provides theoretical tools for understanding the role of actors in crafting, translating and editing transnational policy ideas and organizational models on ombudsman as a global institution of “public accountability”, as well as “politicization” of its institutional mandate.

Keywords

Ombudsman Human rights Good governance Organizational models Diffusion Accountability 

References

  1. Abedin, Najmul. 2006. The Ombudsman Institution and Conflict Resolution in the Contemporary Third World Societies. Journal of Third World Studies 23 (1): 219–233.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2011. Conceptual and Functional Diversity of the Ombudsman Institution: A Classification. Administration & Society 43 (8): 896–929.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711417700.
  3. Abraham, Ann. 2008. The Ombudsman as Part of the UK Constitution: A Contested Role? Parliamentary Affairs 61 (1): 206–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alasuutari, Pertti, Marjaana Rautalin, and Jukka Syväterä. 2015. Organisations as Epistemic Capital: The Case of Independent Children’s Rights Institutions. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 29 (1): 57–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-015-9205-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Ayeni, Victor O. 2014. Ombudsmen as Human Rights Institutions. Journal of Human Rights 13 (4): 498–511.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2014.886950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bacchi, Carol Lee. 1999. Women, Policy and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Bakewell, R.D. 1986. The Ombudsman and Politics. Australian Journal of Public Administration 45 (1): 47–59.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1986.tb01038.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baudot, Pierre-Yves, and Anne Revillard. 2011. Le Médiateur de La République Au Prisme de La Démocratie Administrative. Revue Française d’administration Publique 137–138: 193–207.  https://doi.org/10.3917/rfap.137.0193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beamer, Glenn. 2002. Elite Interviews and State Politics Research. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 2 (1): 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beck, Colin J., Gili S. Drori, and John W. Meyer. 2012. World Influences on Human Rights Language in Constitutions: A Cross-National Study. International Sociology 27 (4): 483–501.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580912443575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bennett, Colin J. 1997. Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross-National Adoption of Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic Accountability. Governance 10 (3): 213–233.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.401997040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blyth, Mark. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bousta, Rhita. 2007. Contribution à Une Définition de l’Ombudsman. Revue Française d’administration Publique 123: 387–397.  https://doi.org/10.3917/rfap.123.0387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bovens, Mark. 2005. Public Accountability. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, ed. Ewan Ferlie, Laurence Lynn, and Christopher Pollitt. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bromley, Patricia, and John Meyer. 2015. Hyper-Organization: Global Organizational Expansion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cardenas, Sonia. 2003. Emerging Global Actors: The United Nations and National Human Rights Institutions. Global Governance 9 (1): 23–42.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2014. Chains of Justice: The Global Rise of State Institutions for Human Rights, Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carl, Sabine. 2012. Toward a Definition and Taxonomy of Public Sector Ombudsmen. Canadian Public Administration 55 (2): 203–220.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2012.00208.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 2018. The History and Evolution of the Ombudsman Model. In Research Handbook on the Ombudsman, ed. Marc Hertogh and Richard Kirkham, 17–33. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Pub.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cole, Wade M., and Francisco O. Ramirez. 2013. Conditional Decoupling: Assessing the Impact of National Human Rights Institutions, 1981 to 2004. American Sociological Review 78 (4): 702–725.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413492762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davies, Philip H.J. 2001. Spies as Informants: Triangulation and the Interpretation of Elite Interview Data in the Study of the Intelligence and Security Services. Politics 21 (1): 73–80.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Douglas, Mary. 1987. How Institutions Think? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  24. Elliott, Michael A. 2007. Human Rights and the Triumph of the Individual in World Culture. Cultural Sociology 1 (3): 343–363.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975507082052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Erkkilä, Tero. 2007. Governance and Accountability—A Shift in Conceptualisation. Public Administration Quarterly 31 (1): 1–38.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2012. Government Transparency: Impacts and Unintended Consequences. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Erkkilä, Tero, and Niilo Kauppi. 2017. From Human Rights to Good Governance and Back: The Institutionalization of the European Ombudsman. In The Challenges of European Governance in the Age of Economic Stagnation, Immigration, and Refugees, ed. Chip Carey, 239–251. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  28. Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gammeltoft-Hansen, Hans. 2008. The Ombudsman as a Marker of the Limits of Politics. Unpublished conference paper presented in Tallinn, 7 March 2008.Google Scholar
  30. Giddens, Anthony. 1986. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0745665284.html.
  31. Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review 48 (6): 781–795.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goodman, Ryan, and Thomas Pegram, eds. 2011. Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change: Assessing National Human Rights Institutions. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Haas, Peter M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46 (1): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hertogh, Marc, and Richard Kirkham, eds. 2018. Research Handbook on the Ombudsman. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Pub.Google Scholar
  35. Hidén, Mikael. 1973. The Ombudsman in Finland: The First Fifty Years. Translated by Aaron Bell and edited by Donald C. Rowat. Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hobsbawm, Eric. 1987. Introduction: Inventing Traditions. In The Invention of Tradition, ed. Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hofmann, Herwig C.H., and Jacques Ziller, eds. 2017. Accountability in the EU: The Role of the European Ombudsman. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  38. Klein, Rudolf. 1976. Ombudsman into Mediateur. The Political Quarterly 47 (1): 92–94.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1976.tb02166.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koo, Jeong-Woo, and Francisco O. Ramirez. 2009. National Incorporation of Global Human Rights: Worldwide Expansion of National Human Rights Institutions, 1966–2004. Social Forces 87 (3): 1321–1353.  https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Koselleck, Reinhart. 2004. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Krasner, Stephen D. 1984. Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics. Comparative Politics 16 (2): 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kucsko-Stadlmayer, Gabriele. 2008. European Ombudsman-Institutions: A Comparative Legal Analysis Regarding the Multifaceted Realisation of an Idea. Vienna: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Magnette, Paul. 2003. Between Parliamentary Control and the Rule of Law: The Political Role of the Ombudsman in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 10 (5): 677–694.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000124032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mahoney, James. 2000. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ———. 2003. Strategies of Causal Assessment in Comparative Historical Analysis. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, 337–372. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Mahoney, James, and Kathleen Thelen, eds. 2009. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Marcussen, Martin. 2000. Ideas and Elites: The Social Construction of Economic and Monetary Union. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.Google Scholar
  48. ———. 2005. Central Banks on the Move. Journal of European Public Policy 12 (5): 903–923.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500161597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Meyer, John W., John Boli, George M. Thomas, and Francisco O. Ramirez. 1997. World Society and the Nation-State. The American Journal of Sociology 103 (1): 144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mulgan, Richard. 2000. Accountability’: An Ever-Expanding Concept? Public Administration 78 (3): 555–573.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Neustadt, Richard E., and Ernest R. May, eds. 1986. Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  52. O’Hara, Glen. 2011. Parties, People, and Parliament: Britain’s ‘Ombudsman’ and the Politics of the 1960s. Journal of British Studies 50 (3): 690–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Palonen, Kari. 2003. Four Times of Politics: Policy, Polity, Politicking, and Politicization. Alternatives 28 (2): 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peters, B. Guy. 2001. From Change to Change: Patterns of Continuing Administrative Reform in Europe. Public Organization Review 1 (1): 41–54.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011568911704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peters, Guy B., Jon Pierre, and Desmond S. King. 2005. The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism. The Journal of Politics 67 (04): 1275–1300.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00360.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time. History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ramirez, Francisco O., Yasemin Soysal, and Suzanne Shanahan. 1997. The Changing Logic of Political Citizenship: Cross-National Acquisition of Women’s Suffrage Rights, 1890 to 1990. American Sociological Review 62 (5): 735–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reif, Linda C. 2000. Building Democratic Institutions: The Role of National Human Rights Institutions in Good Governance and Human Rights Protection. Harvard Human Rights Journal 13: 1–69.Google Scholar
  59. ———. 2004. The Ombudsman, Good Governance and the International Human Rights System. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Remac, Milan. 2013. Standards of Ombudsman Assessment: A New Normative Concept? Utrecht Law Review 9 (3): 62–78.  https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. ———. 2014. Coordinating Ombudsmen and the Judiciary: A Comparative View on the Relations between Ombudsmen and the Judiciary in the Netherlands, England and the European Union. PhD Thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  62. Risse, Thomas. 2010. A Community of Europeans?: Transnational Identities and Public Spheres. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Risse, Thomas, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1999. The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction. In The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, ed. Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink, 1–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Risse, Thomas, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink, eds. 2013. The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Rothstein, Bo. 2000. Trust, Social Dilemmas and Collective Memories. Journal of Theoretical Politics 12 (4): 477–501.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692800012004007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 2003. Can One or a Few Cases Yield Gains? In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, 305–336. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sahlin, Kerstin, and Linda Wedlin. 2008. Circulating Ideas: Imitation, Translation and Editing. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, ed. Royston Greewood, Christine Oliver, Roy Suddaby, and Kerstin Sahlin, 218–242. London: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sahlin-Andersson, Kerstin, and Lars Engwall. 2002. The Expansion of Management Knowledge: Carriers, Flows, and Sources. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. The American Political Science Review 64 (4): 1033–1053.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1958356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schmidt, Vivien A. 2000. Values and Discourse in Adjustment. In Welfare and Work in the Open Economy: Volume I: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness, ed. Fritz Scharpf and Vivien A. Schmidt, 229–309. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schmidt, Vivien A. 2002. The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. ———. 2006. Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. ———. 2008. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 303–326.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. ———. 2010. Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change Through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism. European Political Science Review 2 (1): 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. 1st ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  76. Skinner, Quentin. 1969. Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. History and Theory 8 (1): 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Somers, Margaret R. 1993. Citizenship and the Place of the Public Sphere: Law, Community, and Political Culture in the Transition to Democracy. American Sociological Review 58 (5): 587–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Somers, Margaret R., and Fred Block. 2005. From Poverty to Perversity: Ideas, Markets, and Institutions over 200 Years of Welfare Debate. American Sociological Review 70 (2): 260–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vennesson, Pascal. 2008. Case Studies and Process Tracing: Theories and Practices. In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, ed. Donatella Della Porta and Michael Keating, 223–239. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vogiatzis, Nikos. 2017. The European Ombudsman and Good Administration in the European Union. 1st ed. 2018 edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Political Science, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations