Advertisement

The Strategy of Constructing an Interdisciplinary Knowledge Center

  • Xiaohui Zou
  • Shunpeng Zou
  • Xiaoqun WangEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1075)

Abstract

This paper aims to explain the construction strategy of interdisciplinary knowledge centers from the perspective of expert systems, knowledge management and educational information technology. The method is: Firstly, it explores how to construct the strategy of interdisciplinary knowledge centers sharing, and then makes necessary explorations from computer assisted knowledge management, expert knowledge acquisition and educational autonomous learning. Finally, establish the foundation of natural language understanding in the domain knowledge base which is the basis of the interdisciplinary knowledge center. It is characterized by the application of the wisdom system studied strategy, with machine translation, machine learning and human-computer interaction, starting from the excellent courses in research universities, with the combination of intelligent text analysis and knowledge module finishing, and with the application of “seven-stapes pass” and “eight-persons group” as the education management innovation paradigm. The result is the new paradigm with both standardization and individuality, namely the construction of an interdisciplinary knowledge center that combines large production with small production. The significance lies in the combination of “language, knowledge, software, hardware formal system engineering” and “education, management, learning, application social system engineering”, that help to promote the interdisciplinary knowledge center and its systems engineering talents training. It is more efficient to build the smart systems studied for serving the society.

Keywords

Smart systems studied Computer assisted knowledge management Knowledge centers sharing Natural language understanding Expert knowledge acquisition 

References

  1. 1.
    Aztiria, A., et al.: Learning patterns in ambient intelligence environments: a survey. Artif. Intell. Rev. 34(1), 35–51 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Madden, M.G., et al.: Transfer of experience between reinforcement learning environments with progressive difficulty. Artif. Intell. Rev. 21(3–4), 375–398 (2004)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Snow, C., et al.: Network EducationWare: an open-source web-based system for synchronous distance education. IEEE Trans. Educ. 48(4), 705–712 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Graetz, C., et al.: Toothbrushing education via a smart software visualization system. J. Periodontol. 84(2), 186–195 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fox, B.I., et al.: Knowledge, skills, and resources for pharmacy informatics education. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 75(5), 93 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tofade, T., et al.: Use of SMART learning objectives to introduce continuing professional development into the pharmacy curriculum. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 76(4), 68 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wen, C., et al.: Design of a microlecture mobile learning system based on smartphone and web platforms. IEEE Trans. Educ. 58(3), 203–207 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hu, Q., et al.: A smart home test bed for undergraduate education to bridge the curriculum gap from traditional power systems to modernized smart grids. IEEE Trans. Educ. 58(1), 32–38 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fjortoft, N., et al.: Smartphones, memory, and pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2018:ajpe7054Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lehto, M.R., et al.: Scientific knowledge acquisition during the extension of GSA: an expert system for generic safety analysis. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2(1), 61–75 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marcus, S.: SALT: a knowledge-acquisition tool for propose-and-revise systems. Artif. Intell. 39(1), 1–37 (1988)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Compton, P., et al.: Ripple down rules: turning knowledge acquisition into knowledge maintenance. Artif. Intell. Med. 4(6), 463–475 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Birmingham, W., et al.: Knowledge-acquisition tools with explicit problem-solving models. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 8(1), 5–25 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wagner, W.P., et al.: Knowledge acquisition for expert systems in accounting and financial problem domains. Knowl.-Based Syst. 15(8), 439–447 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kasabov, N.K., et al.: Fu N N/2—a fuzzy neural network architecture for adaptive learning and knowledge acquisition. Inf. Sci. 101(3), 155–175 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prado, R.P., et al.: On providing quality of service in grid computing through multi-objective swarm-based knowledge acquisition in fuzzy schedulers. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 53(2), 228–247 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leu, G., et al.: A multi-disciplinary review of knowledge acquisition methods: from human to autonomous eliciting agents. Knowl.-Based Syst. 105(9), 1–22 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shult, D.: Augmenting course quality through the use of videotapes. Am. J. Phys. 49(4), 344 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Poirier, T.I., et al.: Use of web technology and active learning strategies in a quality assessment methods course. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 64(3), 289–294 (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stevenson, T.L., et al.: A quality improvement course review of advanced pharmacy practice experiences. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 75(6), 116 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kesari, K., et al.: Integrating residents with institutional quality improvement teams. Med. Educ. 51, 1173 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Porter, A.L., et al.: Development of a holistic assessment plan to evaluate a four-semester laboratory course series. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 81(2), 33 (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bonnes, S.L., et al.: Flipping the quality improvement classroom in residency education. Acad. Med. 92(1), 101 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hessler, M., et al.: Availability of cookies during an academic course session affects evaluation of teaching. Med. Educ. 52(6), 1064–1072 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bastian, K.C., et al.: Does quantity affect quality? teachers’ course preparations and effectiveness. J. Res. Educ. Eff. 1–45 (2018)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zou, S., Zou, X.: On the forward-looking nature of contemporary science general education in the perspective of fairness - the enlightenment from “Science for All Americans”. In: The 2nd Capital University Higher Education Graduate Academic Forum Proceedings 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zou, X., et al.: The new mission of contemporary chinese universities: cultural heritage and innovation based on chinese thinking and bilingual processing. v 25(5), 106–113 (2012)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xiaohui, Z., Shunpeng, Z.: Two major categories of formal strategy. Comput. Appl. Softw. 24(16), 3086–3114 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zou, S., et al.: Understanding: how to resolve ambiguity. In: Shi, Z. (eds.) Intelligence Science I. ICIS 2017, vol. 510. Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zou, S., et al.: How to do knowledge module finishing. In: Shi, Z. (ed.), vol 539. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hua, W., et al.: Using two formal strategies to eliminate ambiguity in poetry text, vol 539. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Xu, W., et al.: The cognitive features of programming language and natural language, vol 539. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Luo X., et al.: The cognitive features of interface language and user language, vol 539. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Maimaiti, M., et al.: Discussion on bilingual cognition in international exchange activities, vol 539. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang, G., et al.: Language understanding of the three groups of connections, vol 539. Springer (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sino-American Searle Research Center, Interdisciplinary Knowledge Center Project TeamBeijingChina
  2. 2.China University of GeosciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Peking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations