Advertisement

Conceptual Approach to Building a Digital Twin of the Production System

  • S. I. SuyatinovEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 259)

Abstract

The digital twin is an important component of the cyber-physical system. This new structure of the production system was the result of the development of information technology. The article shows that, despite the long history and success in the development of production information systems, the concept of building digital twins of production systems is at an early stage. One of the problems in creating digital twins is the need for integration and joint processing of a large amount of heterogeneous information. It is shown that the problem of reflecting the current state of the production system is in many ways similar to the problem of the internal representation of the surrounding world in living systems. It is proposed to choose the theory of the levels of the physiologist N. A. Bernstein as the basis of the conceptual approach to the development of digital twins. The mechanisms of forming models of the external world at every level are outlined. A description of the hierarchical system for processing different types of information and obtaining an invariant representation of the external world are presented. The principles of constructing a virtual image in the organization of motor activity are formulated. The implementation of these principles when building a digital twin of the production process will improve the efficiency of integration methods and joint processing of information.

Keywords

Cyber-physical system Production element Central nervous system Virtual image Big data Digital twin 

References

  1. 1.
    Kamensky, E.G.: Context of NBIC-technologies development: institutions, ideology and social myths. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. 6(6), 181–185 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roco, M.C., Bainbridge, W.S. (eds.): Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, J., Bagheri, B., Kao, H.A.: A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufact. Lett. 3, 18–23 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tarassov, V.B.: Enterprise total agentification as a way to industry 4.0: forming artificial societies via goal-resource networks. In: Abraham, A., Kovalev, S., Tarassov, V., Snasel, V., Sukhanov, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Scientific Conference “Intelligent Information Technologies for Industry” (IITI’18). IITI’18 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 874. Springer, Cham (2019). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01818-4_3
  5. 5.
    Koval’, V.A., Osenin, V.N., Suyatinov, S.I., Torgashova O.Y.: J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 50(4), 638–653 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1064230711040125MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Protalinsky, O.M., Shcherbatov, I.A., Stepanov P.V.: Identification of the actual state and entity availability forecasting in power engineering using neural-network technologies. J. Phys. Conf. Series. 891(1) Article 012289 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/891/1/012289Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Antipov, K.V., Maslakov, M.P., Yurenko, K.I.: Improvement of the automated control systems for the development of the metallurgy. Procedia Eng. 129, 1010–1014 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bozhko, A.: Math modeling of sequential coherent and linear assembly plans in CAD systems. Global Smart Indus. Conf. (GloSIC) 2018, 1–5 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1109/GloSIC.2018.8570090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Skvortsov, V., Proletarsky, A., Arzybaev, A.: Feature recognition module of the CAPP system. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, ElConRus (2019). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EIConRus.2019.8656655
  10. 10.
    Xu, P., Wang, Z., Li, V.: Prognostics and health management (PHM) system requirements and validation. In: 2010 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference. Macao, pp. 1–4 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1109/phm.2010.5413560
  11. 11.
    Loh, B.K., Koo, K.L., Ho, K.F., Idrus, R.: A review of customer relationship management system benefits and implementation in small and medium enterprises. In: Proceedings of the 12th WSEAS International Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Biology, Business and Acoustics, pp. 247–253 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tai, L., Liu, M.: Deep-learning in mobile robotics—from perception to control systems: a survey on why and why not. CoRR, abs/1612.07139 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Poldrack, R.A., Farah, M.J.: Progress and challenges in probing the human brain. Nature 526, 371–379 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.: Deep learning. Nature 521(7553), 436 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bernstein, N.A.: The current problems of modern neurophysiology. In: Sporns, O., Edelman, G.M. (eds.) Bernstein’s Dynamic View of the Brain: The Current Problems of Modem Neurophysiology. Motor Control. 2(4), 285–299 (1998). (Original work published 1945)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bongaardt, R., Meijer, O.G.: Bernstein’s theory of movement behavior: historical development and contemporary relevance. J. Mot. Behav. 32(1), 57–71 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vitor, L.S., Turvey, M.T.: Bernstein’s levels of movement construction: a contemporary perspective. Hum. Movement Sci. 57, 111–133 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.11.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Suyatinov, S.: Bernstein’s theory of levels and its application for assessing the human operator state. In: Dolinina O. et al. (eds.) Recent Research in Control Engineering and Decision Making. ICIT-2019. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 199, pp. 298–312. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12072-6_25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Alexandrov, A.V., Frolov, A.A., Mergner, T., Hettich, G., Frolov, A.M.: Movement control in anthropomorphic robot using a human inspired eigenmovement concept. Russian J. Biomech. 22(1), 48–61 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.15593/RJBiomech/2018.1.05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shen, K., Selezneva, M.S., Neusypin, K.A., Proletarsky, A.V.: Novel variable structure measurement system with intelligent components for flight vehicles. Metrol. Meas. Syst. 24(2), 347–356 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Buldakova, T.I, Suyatinov, S.I.: The significance of interdisciplinary projects in becoming a research engineer. In: Smirnova, E.V., Clark, R.P. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Engineering Education in a Global Context, pp. 243–253. IGI Global, Hershey, PA (2019).  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3395-5.ch022
  22. 22.
    Buldakova, T.I., Dzhalolov, A.S.: Analysis of data processes and choices of data-processing and security technologies in situation centers. Sci. Technical Info. Process. 39(2), 127–132 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688212020116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zubov, N.E., Li, M.V., Mikrin, E.A., Ryabchenko, V.N.: Terminal synthesis of orbital orientation for a spacecraft. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 56(4), 721–737 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064230717040190MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bauman Moscow State Technical UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations