Advertisement

The Future of Education

  • Carmel ConnEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, the case is made for inclusive pedagogy as the approach to education that is most relevant to autistic pupils. Inclusive pedagogy assumes that all children are capable as learners and that inclusion requires change in the teacher and her beliefs, attitudes and knowledge, as well as in the context of learning. It is argued that such a view strongly aligns with the perspective of autistic people on education and their prioritisation of teacher understanding and environmental adaptation. Critical issues for education as it relates to autistic pupils are outlined in relation to the role of communication within teaching, the value of continuous experimentation within pedagogy, the need to rethink behaviour management for autistic pupils, and the importance of recognising the professionalism of teachers and existing professional standards.

Keywords

Inclusive pedagogy Communication Experimentation Behaviour management 

References

  1. Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, H. (2012). Practice, practice: Notions of adaptation and normality amongst adults with Asperger syndrome. Disability Studies Quarterly, 32(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  2. Black-Hawkins, K. (2017). Understanding inclusive pedagogy: Learning with and from teachers. In V. Plows & B. Whitburn (Eds.), Inclusive education: Making sense of everyday practice (pp. 13–30). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Donaldson, G. (2015). Successful futures: Independent review of curriculum and assessment arrangements in Wales. Available at: http://gov.wales/docs/dcells/publications/150225-successful-futures-en.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2019.
  4. Donnellan, A. M., Hill, D. A., & Leary, M. R. (2013). Rethinking autism: Implications of sensory and movement differences for understanding and support. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6(124), 1–11.Google Scholar
  5. Ecclestone, K., & Hayes, D. (2009). The dangerous rise of therapeutic education. Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education. (2012). Profile of inclusive teachers. Odense, Denmark: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.Google Scholar
  7. Florian, L., & Graham, A. (2014). Can an expanded interpretation of phronesis support teacher professional development for inclusion? Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(4), 465–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Florian, L., & Spratt, J. (2013). Enacting inclusion: A framework for interrogating inclusive practice. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28(2), 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hart, S., & Drummond, M. J. (2013). Learning without limits: Constructing a pedagogy free from determinist beliefs about ability. In L. Florian (Ed.), The Sage handbook of special education (pp. 439–458). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, and Washington, DC: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Hodge, N. (2016). Schools with labels. In K. Runswick-Cole, R. Mallett, & S. Timimi (Eds.), Re-thinking autism: Diagnosis, identity and equality (pp. 185–203). London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Lemke, M., & Zhu, L. (2018). Successful futures? New economy business logics, child rights, and Welsh educational reform. Policy Futures in Education, 16(3), 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Martin, N., & Milton, D. (2018). Supporting the inclusion of autistic children. In G. Knowles (Ed.), Supporting inclusive practice and ensuring opportunity is equal for all (pp. 111–124). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. McGuire, A. (2017). De-regulating disorder: On the rise of the spectrum as a neoliberal metric of human value. Journal of Literacy and Cultural Disability Studies, 11(4), 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Milton, D. E. M. (2017). Educational discourse and the autistic student: A study using Q-sort methodology. In A mismatch of salience: Explorations of the nature of autism from theory to practice (pp. 163–179). Hove, East Sussex: Pavilion.Google Scholar
  15. Saggers, B. (2015). Student perceptions: Improving the educational experiences of high school students on the autism spectrum. Improving Schools, 18(1), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sainsbury, C. (2009). Martian in the playground: Understanding the schoolchild with Asperger’s syndrome (Rev. ed.). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, and Singapore: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Scottish Teacher Education Committee. (2014). National framework for inclusion (Revised). Available at: http://www.frameworkforinclusion.org/STEC14%20Report%20Jun(PDF%20V).pdf. Accessed 18 June 2018.
  18. Väyrynen, S., & Paksuniemi, M. (2018). Translating inclusive values into pedagogical actions. International Journal of Inclusive Education.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1452989.
  19. Vivian, A. F. (2012). They hate you. Yes, you. In J. Bascom (Ed.), Loud hands: Autistic people talking (pp. 183–188). Washington, DC: The Autistic Self Advocacy Network.Google Scholar
  20. Watson, C. (2010). Educational policy in Scotland: Inclusion and the control society. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(1), 93–104.Google Scholar
  21. Williams, J., & Hanke, D. (2007). ‘Do you know what sort of school I want?’: Optimum features of school provision for pupils with autistic spectrum disorder. Good Autism Practice, 8(2), 51–63.Google Scholar
  22. Yergeau, M. (n.d.). Accommodating. Available at: http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/18.1/coverweb/yergeau-et-al/pages/reason/accom.html. Accessed 18 June 2019.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education, Early Years and Social WorkUniversity of South WalesNewportUK

Personalised recommendations