The Storied Curriculum: What Is Education For?

  • Carmel ConnEmail author


Stories are used by teachers to make sense of the complexity of their practice and produce a coherent account of the everyday realities of classrooms. This chapter explores two storied versions of the curriculum that exist for autistic pupils, one concerning education as a story of recovery from autism, and the second concerning a progressive view of education. Two curriculum models—curriculum as mastery and curriculum as process—are used to illustrate the ways in which progressive ideas about education are essentially incompatible with the use of specialised practices. It is argued that a focus on educational values provides an explanation of why different practices exist for autistic pupils and how mainstream practitioners think differently about their role and responsibilities in relation to this group of pupils.


Progressive education Educational values Mastery Process Curriculum 


  1. Allan, J. (2008). Rethinking inclusive education: The philosophers of difference in practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Biesta, G. J. J. (2007). Why ‘what works’ won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biesta, G. J. J. (2010a). Why ‘what works’ still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biesta, G. J. J. (2010b). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics and democracy. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Biesta, G. J. J. (2012). The future of teacher education: Evidence, competence or wisdom? Research on Steiner Education, 3(1), 8–21.Google Scholar
  6. Biesta, G. J. J. (2013). The beautiful risk of education. Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Broderick, A. A., & Ne’eman, A. (2008). Autism as metaphor: Narrative and counter-narrative. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(5–6), 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourne, J. (2008). Official pedagogic discourses and the construction of learners’ identities. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education. Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Clandinin, D. J. (2015). Stories to live by on the professional knowledge landscape. Waikato Journal of Education, Special 20th Anniversary Collection, 183–193.Google Scholar
  10. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363–401). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1996). Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes: Teacher stories. Stories of teachers. School stories. Stories of schools. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 24–30.Google Scholar
  12. Donnellan, A. M., Hill, D. A., & Leary, M. R. (2013). Rethinking autism: Implications of sensory and movement differences for understanding and support. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6(124), 1–11.Google Scholar
  13. Harðarson, A. (2017). Aims of education: How to resist the temptation of technocratic models. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(1), 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hope, E. (2016, February 9). Can speech challenged students get an appropriate education? Emma’s Hope Book: Living Being Autistic. Available at: Accessed 21 June 2019.
  15. James, M., & Pollard, A. (2011). TLRP’s ten principles for effective pedagogy: Rationale, development, evidence, argument and impact. Research Papers in Education, 26(3), 275–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jamie + Lion. (2018, April 10). Spoons and other metaphors: How I use my social care budget. Available at: Accessed 26 April 2019.
  17. Kasari, C., & Smith, T. (2013). Interventions in schools for children with autism spectrum disorder: Methods and recommendations. Autism, 17(3), 254–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kedar, I. (2012). Ido in Autismland: Climbing out of autism’s silent prison. Washington, DC: Sharon Kedar. Google Scholar
  19. McGuire, A. (2017). De-regulating disorder: On the rise of the spectrum as a neoliberal metric of human value. Journal of Literacy and Cultural Disability Studies, 11(4), 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Priestley, M., & Humes, W. (2010). The development of Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence: Amnesia and déjà vu. Oxford Review of Education, 36(3), 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pring, R. (2015). Philosophy of educational research (3rd ed.). London, Oxford, New York, New Delhi, and Sydney: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  22. Reiss, M. J., & White, J. (2013). An aims-based curriculum: The significance of human flourishing for schools. London: Institute of Education Press.Google Scholar
  23. Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann Educational.Google Scholar
  24. Yergeau, M. (2018). Authoring autism: On rhetoric and neurological queerness. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Young, M. F. D. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education, Early Years and Social WorkUniversity of South WalesNewportUK

Personalised recommendations