Advertisement

Sketches Versus New Technologies in Design Creative Process

  • Ana Moreira da SilvaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Design and Innovation book series (SSDI, volume 1)

Abstract

As the designer has to conceive and develop solutions for specific problems of different nature, sketches may present themselves as an operative support for conceptual reflection, problem solving and critical analyses within the several phases of the design process. Once, hand drawing and sketching ruled design curricula, because there simply was no alternative. The introduction of CAD, image editing, on-line search engines and other new technology advances have irrevocably changed the way we perceive and map the world around us. As a result, the status and value of hand-drawing has changed and it is important to reflect upon the functions, the teaching and the evaluation of the tools we use to express design. One of the main questions we would like to find answers is if the nowadays wide use of new technologies doesn’t invalidate the important role played by hand-drawing as a stimulating instrument when sketching the first ideas and as a critical verification of the several solution hypotheses. Sketching survival facing the artificial intelligence growing importance is this research main issue. Through the study of several statements from various authors we intend to investigate not only the permanence of the sketching important role since mid-last century to present, but also its possible use in the future. From this theoretical approach we also intend to verify the relevance of hand-drawing teaching in the formation of the future designers, despite the paradigm changes that emerge from the new technologies advances.

Keywords

Sketches Technology Drawing Design process 

References

  1. Baskinger M (2008) Pencils before pixels, a primer in hand-generated sketching. In: Interactions, vol XV. https://mv122011.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/baskinger-pencils_pixels.pdf. Accessed Feb 2019
  2. Cross N (2005) Engineering design methods, strategies for design. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  3. Denis RC (2000) Uma Introdução à História do Design. Blucher, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  4. Domingos P (2017) A Revolução do Algoritmo Mestre. Manuscrito Editora, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  5. Hamilton P (2009) Drawing with printmaking technology in a digital age. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/microsites/sota/tracey/journal/dat/images/paul_hamilton.pdf
  6. Lawson B (2004) What designers know. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Moreira da Silva A (2010) De Sansedoni a Vasari: um contributo para o estudo do Desenho como fundamento do processo conceptual. Universidade Lusíada Editora, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  8. Norman D (2010) Why design education must change. http://www.core77.com/blog/columns/why_design_education_must_change_17993.asp. Accessed Jan 2019
  9. Ortega AR, Weihermann S (2017) Graphic dialogues: the progress of knowledge in architecture studio. In: Kong MSM, Monteiro MR (eds) Progress(es)—theories and practices. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 111–114Google Scholar
  10. Rohde M (2011) Sketching: the visual thinking power tool. http://alistapart.com/article/sketching-the-visual-thinking-power-tool. Accessed Apr 2019
  11. Roome J (2011) Digital drawing and the creative process. tracey@lboro.ac.uk. Accessed Feb 2019Google Scholar
  12. Schön D (2000) Educando o profissional reflexivo: um novo design para o ensino e a aprendizagem. Artes Médicas Sul, Porto AlegreGoogle Scholar
  13. Tilley A (2008) The inexorable rise of drawing. http://www.transitiongallery.co.uk. Accessed Mar 2019
  14. Wilkinson C (2016) Thinking through drawing. https://vimeo.com/15908559. Accessed Feb 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIAUD—Lisbon School of ArchitectureUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.CITAD—Faculdade de Arquitetura e ArtesUniversidade LusíadaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations