Advertisement

A Practice-Based Research Model for Interaction in Print Design

  • Marco NevesEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Design and Innovation book series (SSDI, volume 1)

Abstract

Print design is defined by a relationship with technologies that promote static existence of objects. This characterization is usually opposed to interactive possibilities and modification by users. Given its practical nature, the presence of interaction in print design benefits from practice-based methods. To establish a systematic presence of interaction in print design media, we developed a specific method, based on features of design practice. There was an initial planning phase for conception and enhancement of ideas and selection and definition of objects to further improve. We than created models and prototypes and from these, we undertook a design project where we included interaction features in a controlled way to test their application in print production. The method presents a contribution for the inclusion of interaction in print design, modifying objects and their relationship with people.

Keywords

Print design Practice-based research Interaction 

References

  1. Archer B (1995) The nature of research. Co-des Interdisc J Des 6–13Google Scholar
  2. Bloor M, Wood F (2006) Keywords in qualitative methods: a vocabulary of research concepts. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolter J, Gromala D (2003) Text rain: the digital experience. In: Windows and mirrors: interaction design, digital art, and the myth of transparency. MIT Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonsiepe G (1999) Interface: an approach to design. Jan van Eyck Akademie, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper A, Reimann R, Cronin D (2007) About face 3: the essentials of interaction design. Wiley Publishing, IndianápolisGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis M (2008) Why do we need doctoral study in design? Int J Des 2(3):71–79Google Scholar
  7. Dubberly H, Haque U, Pangaro P (2009) What is interaction? Are there different types? Access http://www.dubberly.com/articles/what-is-interaction.html
  8. Haslem N (2011) Not an academic type: what do communication designers know about research? Iridescent Icograda J Des Res 1(1):178–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson M (2002) Problem solved. Phaidon Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Moggridge B (2007) Designing interactions. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Neves M (2013) Printed interactivity towards a new understanding of graphic design. Iridescent Icograda J Des Res 2(2):22–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Neves M (2016a) Enhancing user experience in graphic design: a study in (unusual) interaction. In: Rebelo F, Soares M (eds) Advances in ergonomics in design. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 485, pp 801–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Neves M (2016b) Printed matter as an interactive system. In: Marcus A (ed) Design, user experience, and usability: novel user experiences DUXU 2016, part II. LNCS, vol 9747, pp 625–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Neves M (2017) The future of print design relies on interaction. Des J 20(Suppl 1):S4087–S4100MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Neves M, Caixeiro I (2019) Interactive printed book: a design experience. In: Monteiro MR, Kong MS, Neto MJ (eds) Modernity, frontiers and revolutions: proceedings of the 4th international multidisciplinary congress (PHI 2018) 3–6 Oct 2018. CRC Press, São Miguel, pp 209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nimkulrat N (2007) The role of documentation in practice-led research. J Res Pract 3(1)Google Scholar
  17. Pedgley O, Wormald P (2007) Integration of design projects within a Ph.D. design issues 23(3):70–85Google Scholar
  18. Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H (2002) Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Redström J (2005) Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design. Des Stud 27:123–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rust C, Mottram J, Till J (2007) Review of practice-led research in art, design & architecture. UK, Arts and Humanities Research Council. Access http://shura.shu.ac.uk/7596/1/Pactice-ledReviewNov07.pdf
  21. Saffer D (2007) Designing for interaction: creating smart applications and clever devices, 2nd edn. New Riders, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  22. Scrivener S (2000) Reflection in and on action and practice in creative-production doctoral projects in art and design. Working papers in art and design 1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lisbon School of ArchitectureCIAUD, Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations