Advertisement

Introduction: Basic Income, Fit for Australia and the Fairness Test

  • Jennifer MaysEmail author
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee book series (BIG)

Abstract

This chapter sets the scene for the book and provides an outline of scope, contribution and chapter summary. It starts with a backdrop to contextualize basic income debates in the context of existing Australian political economy and explores the ‘fit’ for the Australian context. The chapter introduces basic income terminology and principles and explores why Australia needs a universal basic income, what is involved and what changes will be made to structural arrangements. The chapter also explores the current feasibility of achieving a non-marginalizing basic income for all, inclusive of people with disability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abberley, P. (1987). The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disability, Handicap & Society, 2(1), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abberley, P. (2006). The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. In L. Barton (Ed.), Overcoming disabling barriers: 18 years of disability and society (pp. 21–36). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Amin, S. (2010). Exiting the crisis of capitalism or capitalism in crisis? Globalizations, 7(1–2), 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amin, S. (2013). The implosion of contemporary capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  5. Australian Government Commission of Inquiry into Poverty. (1975). Poverty in Australia Vol. 1. Henderson poverty report. Canberra, ACT: AGPS.Google Scholar
  6. Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2004). Theorising and researching disability from a social model perspective. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research (pp. 1–17). Leeds, UK: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bickenbach, J. E. (2011). The world report on disability. Disability & Society, 26(5), 655–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bickenbach, J. E., & Cieza, A. (2011). The prospects for universal disability law and social policy. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 1(1), 23–37.Google Scholar
  9. Birnbaum, S. (2012). Basic income reconsidered. Social justice, liberalism, and the demands of equality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowman, D., Mallett, S., & Cooney-O’Donoghue, D. (2017). Basic income: Trade-offs and bottom lines. Fitzroy, VIC: Brotherhood of St Laurence.Google Scholar
  11. Brighouse, H., & Olin Wright, E. (2008). Strong gender egalitarianism. Politics and Society, 36(3), 360–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Wispelaere, J. (2016). The struggle for strategy: On the politics of the basic income proposal. Politics, 36(2), 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Wispelaere, J., & Stirton, L. J. (2004). The many faces of universal basic income. The Political Quarterly, 75(3), 266–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duffy, S. (2010). The citizenship theory of social justice: Exploring the meaning of personalisation for social workers. Journal of Social Work Practice, 24(3), 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duffy, S. (2011). A fair society and the limits of personalization. Tizard Memorial Lecture, 4 March [online]. Retrieved from http://www.centreforwelfarereform.org/library/by-date/a-fair-society-personalisation.html.
  16. Fairclough, N. (2009). A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 162–186). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Fraser, N. (1995). From redistribution to recognition: Dilemmas of justice in a ‘post-socialist’ age. New Left Law Review, 212, 68–93.Google Scholar
  18. Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Fraser, N. (2001). Recognition without ethics? Theory, Culture and Society, 18(2–3), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fraser, N. (2007). Identity, exclusion, and critique: A response to four critics. European Journal of Political Theory, 6(3), 305–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geremek, B. (1994). Poverty: A history (A. Kolakowska, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Blackwells.Google Scholar
  22. Gibilisco, P. (2003). A just society inclusive of ‘people with disabilities’. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 52(December), 128–142.Google Scholar
  23. Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2005). Disability in Australia: Exposing a social apartheid. Sydney, NSW: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
  24. Goodin, R. (2000). Crumbling pillars: Social security futures. The Political Quarterly, 71(2), 144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gramsci, A. (1977). The conquest of the state (J. Mathews, Trans.). In Q. Hoare (Ed.), Antonio Gramsci: Selections from political writings 1910–1920 (pp. 73–78). New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Harvey, P. (2006). The relative cost of a universal basic income and a negative income tax. Basic Income Studies, 1(2), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hopkin, J. (2014). The politics of Piketty: What political science can learn from, and contribute to, the debate on capital in the twenty-first century. The British Journal of Sociology, 65(4), 678–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hughes, B. (2007). Being disabled: Towards a critical social ontology for disability studies. Disability & Society, 22(7), 673–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ingles, D., Phillips, B., & Stewart, M. (2019). From guaranteed minimum income to BI: What would it look like today? In P. Saunders (Ed.), Revisiting Henderson: Poverty, social security and basic income (pp. 377–399). Melbourne, VIC: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Jordan, B. (1992). Basic income and the common good. In P. Van Parijs (Ed.), Arguing for basic income: Ethical foundations for a radical reform (pp. 155–177). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  31. Marshall, T. H. (2000). Citizenship and social class. In C. Pierson & F. G. Castles (Eds.), The welfare state: A reader (pp. 32–41). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Marston, G., & McDonald, C. (2014). The Australian welfare state: Who benefits now? (2nd ed.). Melbourne, VIC: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Mays, J. M. (2012). Australia’s disabling income support system: Tracing the history of the Australian disability income support system 1908 to 2007. Disablism, citizenship and the basic income proposal (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  34. Mays, J. (2016). Disability, citizenship, and basic income: Forging a new alliance for a non-disabling society. In J. Mays, G. Marston, & J. Tomlinson (Eds.), Basic income in Australia and New Zealand: Perspectives from the neoliberal frontier (pp. 207–251). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Mays, J., & Marston, G. (2016). Reimagining equity and egalitarianism: The basic income debate in Australia. Special issue of Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare Symposium on the Basic Income Guarantee, 43(3), Art 3, Number 3.Google Scholar
  36. Mays, J., Marston, G., & Tomlinson, J. (2016). Neoliberal frontiers and economic insecurity: Is basic income a solution? In J. Mays, G. Marston, & J. Tomlinson (Eds.), Basic income in Australia and New Zealand: Perspectives from the neoliberal frontier (pp. 1–25). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Morley, C., & Ablett, P. (2016). A critical social work response to wealth and income inequality. Social Alternatives, 35(4), 20–26.Google Scholar
  38. Nussbaum, M. (2003). Rawls and feminism. In S. Freeman (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Rawls. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paine, T. (1987). Agrarian justice. In M. Foot & I. Kramnick (Eds.), Thomas Paine reader (pp. 471–489). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  41. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Piketty, T. (2015). Capital, inequality, and power. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5(1), 517–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Raventós, D. (2007). Basic income: The material conditions of freedom (J. Wark, Trans.). London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  44. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. In E. Kelly (Ed.), Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 87–121). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Richardson, H. S. (2006). Rawlsian social-contract theory and the severely disabled. The Journal of Ethics, 10(4), 419–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saunders, P. (2007). The costs of disability and the incidence of poverty. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 42(4), 461–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scutella, R. (2004). Moves to a basic income-flat tax system in Australia: Implications for the distribution of income and supply of labour, 5/04. Melbourne, VIC: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  50. Smith-Carrier, T. A., & Green, S. (2017). Another low road to basic income? Mapping a pragmatic model for adopting a basic income in Canada. Basic Income Studies, 12(2), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Spicker, P. (2017). Arguments for welfare: The welfare state and social policy. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
  52. Standing, G. (2002). Beyond the new paternalism: Basic security as equality. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  53. Standing, G. (2009). Work after globalization: Building occupational citizenship. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  55. Standing, G. (2014). A precariat charter: From denizens to citizens. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  56. Stark, C. A. (2007). How to include the severely disabled in a contractarian theory of justice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 15(2), 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stiglitz, J. (2013). The price of inequality. New York: Penguin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Titchkosky, T. (2001). Disability: A rose by any other name? “people-first” language in Canadian society. Canadian Review of Sociology, 38(2), 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Titchkosky, T. (2007). Reading and writing disability differently: The textured life of embodiment. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Tomlinson, J. (2000). Income insecurity: The basic income alternative. Retrieved from http://www.nla.gov.au/nla.arc-42199
  61. Tomlinson, J. (2007). Australia: Basic income and decency. New Community Quarterly, 5(1), 33–41.Google Scholar
  62. Tomlinson, J. (2012). Australia: Basic income -A distant horizon. In M. C. Murray & C. Pateman (Eds.), Basic income worldwide (pp. 227–249). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tomlinson, J. (2016). Australian basic income: Efficiency and equity. In J. Mays, G. Marston, & J. Tomlinson (Eds.), Basic income in Australia and New Zealand: Perspectives from the neoliberal frontier (pp. 54–68). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  64. Torry, M. (2013). Money for everyone: Why we need a citizen’s income. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Torry, M. (2016a). Citizen’s basic income: Is it feasible? In B. Reynolds & S. Healy (Eds.), Basic income radical utopia or practical solution? (pp. 31–47). Dublin, Ireland: Social Justice Ireland.Google Scholar
  66. Torry, M. (2016b). The feasibility of citizen’s income. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Van Parijs, P. (2007). International distributive justice. In R. E. Goodin, P. Pettit, & T. Pogge (Eds.), The Blackwell’s companion to political philosophy (Vol. II, pp. 638–652). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  68. Van Parijs, P., & Vanderborght, Y. (2017). Basic income: A radical proposal for a free society and sane economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wasserman, D., Asch, A., Blustein, J., & Putnam, D. (2015, Summer). Disability and justice. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/disability-justice/
  70. White, A. (2013). Introduction: A state-in-society agenda. In A. White (Ed.), The everyday life of the state: A state-in-society approach (pp. 3–12). Seattle, WA: University of Washington.Google Scholar
  71. Whiteford, P. (2011). Income support, inequality and social risks. In P. Smyth & J. Buchanan (Eds.), Inclusive growth in Australia. Sydney, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  72. Whiteford, P. (2014). Australia: Inequality, prosperity and their impacts in a radical welfare state. In W. Salverda et al. (Eds.) Changing inequalities and societal impacts in rich countries: Thirty countries’ experiences (GINI growing inequalities’ impacts, Vol. 2). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Whiteford, P. (2015). Inequality and its socioeconomic impacts. The Australian Economic Review, 48(1), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Widerquist, K. (2013). Independence, propertylessness, and basic income: A theory of freedom as the power to say no. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Widerquist, K., & Howard, M. W. (2012). Conclusion: Lessons from the Alaska model. In K. Widerquist & M. W. Howard (Eds.), Alaska’s permanent fund dividend: Examining its suitability as a model (pp. 221–227). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Widerquist, K., Vanderborght, Y., Noguera, J., & De Wispeleare, J. (2013). Introduction. In K. Widerquist, J. A. Noguera, Y. Vanderborght, & J. De Wispeleare (Eds.), Basic income: An anthology of contemporary research (pp. xi–xxiv). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kelvin Grove CampusQueensland University of TechnologyKelvin GroveAustralia

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options