Advertisement

An Open Source Dataset and Ontology for Product Footprinting

  • Agneta Ghose
  • Katja Hose
  • Matteo LissandriniEmail author
  • Bo Pedersen Weidema
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11762)

Abstract

Product footprint describes the environmental impacts of a product system. To identify such impact, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) takes into account the entire lifespan and production chain, from material extraction to final disposal or recycling. This requires gathering data from a variety of heterogeneous sources, but current access to those is limited and often expensive. The BONSAI project, instead, aims to build a shared resource where the community can contribute to data generation, validation, and management decisions. In particular, its first goal is to produce an open dataset and an open source toolchain capable of supporting LCA calculations. This will allow the science of lifecycle assessment to perform in a more transparent and more reproducible way, and will foster data integration and sharing. Linked Open Data and semantic technologies are a natural choice for achieving this goal. In this work, we present the first results of this effort (https://github.com/BONSAMURAIS/): (1) the core of a comprehensive ontology for industrial ecology and associated relevant data; and (2) the first steps towards an RDF dataset and associated tools to incorporate several large LCA data sources.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was partially funded by the Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF) under grant agreement no. DFF-4093-00301B and Aalborg University’s Talent Programme.

References

  1. 1.
    Curran, M.A.: Environmental life-cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 1(3), 179–179 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harth, A., Hose, K., Schenkel, R.: Linked Data Management. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Janowicz, K., et al.: A minimal ontology pattern for life cycle assessment data. In: WOP. CEUR-WS.org (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weidema, B.P., Schmidt, J., Fantke, P., Pauliuk, S.: On the boundary between economy and environment in life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 23(9), 1839–1846 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilkinson, M.D., Dumontier, M., et al.: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yan, B., et al.: An ontology for specifying spatiotemporal scopes in life cycle assessment. In: Diversity++@ ISWC, pp. 25–30 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Agneta Ghose
    • 1
  • Katja Hose
    • 2
  • Matteo Lissandrini
    • 2
    Email author
  • Bo Pedersen Weidema
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PlanningAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations