Advertisement

Synthesize Mammogram from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Gradient Guided cGANs

  • Gongfa Jiang
  • Yao LuEmail author
  • Jun Wei
  • Yuesheng Xu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11769)

Abstract

Compared to mammographic screening, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as an adjunct to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) so called combo-mode has been shown to improve sensitivity and reduce false positive rates in breast cancer detection. However, combo-mode screening increases the radiation dose to the patient. In this study, our purpose is to develop a new approach to synthesize photo realistic digital mammogram (SDM) from reconstructed DBT volume to replace adjunct FFDM which in turn will reduce the radiation dose to the patient during breast cancer screening. A deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) is used to synthesize SDM from DBT with FFDM as ground truth during the training. When training our DCNN, a traditional mean squared error (MSE) loss is avoided due to over-smoothing problem. Instead, we propose a gradient guided cGANs (GGGAN) training method to retain subtle tissue structures and microcalcifications (MCs) in the SDM during the DCNN training. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the line profiles are used as image quality measures for quantitative comparison. In additional, a human observer perceptual experiment is conducted to qualitatively compare FFDM to SDM of the same patient. The results indicate that SDM has comparable perceptual image quality to FFDM both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Keywords

FFDM DBT Image synthesis Deep learning 

Supplementary material

490281_1_En_89_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (304 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 304 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Hodgson, R., et al.: Systematic review of 3D mammography for breast cancer screening. Breast 27, 52–61 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Svahn, T., et al.: Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography. Breast 24(2), 93–99 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miglioretti, D.L., et al.: Radiation-induced breast cancer incidence and mortality from digital mammography screening: a modeling study. Ann. internal Med. 164(4), 205–214 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wei, J., et al.: Synthesizing mammogram from digital breast tomosynthesis. Phys. Med. Biol. 64(4), 045011 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zuckerman, S.P., et al.: Implementation of synthesized two-dimensional mammography in a population-based digital breast tomosynthesis screening program. Radiology 281(3), 730–736 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ledig, C., et al.: Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, p. 4 (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, T.C., et al.: High-resolution image synthesis and semantic manipulation with conditional GANs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.11585 (2017)
  8. 8.
    Shan, H., et al.: Can deep learning outperform modern commercial CT image reconstruction methods? arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03691 (2018)
  9. 9.
    Yu, B., et al.: Ea-GANs: edge-aware generative adversarial networks for cross-modality MR image synthesis. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38(7), 1750–1762 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, L.C., et al.: Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.05587 (2017)
  11. 11.
    Ioannou, Y., et al.: Deep roots: improving CNN efficiency with hierarchical filter groups. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1231–1240 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang, Q., et al.: Low-dose CT image denoising using a generative adversarial network with Wasserstein distance and perceptual loss. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37(6), 1348–1357 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Machine Intelligence and Advanced ComputingMinistry of EducationGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.Perception Vision Medical Technologies LTD. Co.GuangzhouChina
  4. 4.Old Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations