Advertisement

Deep Variational Networks with Exponential Weighting for Learning Computed Tomography

  • Valery VishnevskiyEmail author
  • Richard Rau
  • Orcun Goksel
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11769)

Abstract

Tomographic image reconstruction is relevant for many medical imaging modalities including X-ray, ultrasound (US) computed tomography (CT) and photoacoustics, for which the access to full angular range tomographic projections might be not available in clinical practice due to physical or time constraints. Reconstruction from incomplete data in low signal-to-noise ratio regime is a challenging and ill-posed inverse problem that usually leads to unsatisfactory image quality. While informative image priors may be learned using generic deep neural network architectures, the artefacts caused by an ill-conditioned design matrix often have global spatial support and cannot be efficiently filtered out by means of convolutions. In this paper we propose to learn an inverse mapping in an end-to-end fashion via unrolling optimization iterations of a prototypical reconstruction algorithm. We herein introduce a network architecture that performs filtering jointly in both sinogram and spatial domains. To efficiently train such deep network we propose a novel regularization approach based on deep exponential weighting. Experiments on US and X-ray CT data show that our proposed method is qualitatively and quantitatively superior to conventional non-linear reconstruction methods as well as state-of-the-art deep networks for image reconstruction. Fast inference time of the proposed algorithm allows for sophisticated reconstructions in real-time critical settings, demonstrated with US SoS imaging of an ex vivo bovine phantom.

Notes

Funding

It was provided by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF).

References

  1. 1.
    Adler, J., Öktem, O.: Learned primal-dual reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37(6), 1322–1332 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., Eckstein, J.: Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Found. Trends ML 3(1), 1–122 (2011)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheng, A., et al.: Deep learning image reconstruction method for limited-angle ultrasound tomography in prostate cancer. In: Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging, p. 1095516 (2019)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hammernik, K., et al.: Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data. MRM 79(6), 3055–3071 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hammernik, K., Würfl, T., Pock, T., Maier, A.: A deep learning architecture for limited-angle computed tomography reconstruction. Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2017. INFORMAT, pp. 92–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54345-0_25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Knoll, F., Bredies, K., Pock, T., Stollberger, R.: Second order total generalized variation (TGV) for MRI. MRM 65(2), 480–491 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Landweber, L.: An iteration formula for Fredholm integral equations of the first kind. Am. J. Math. 73(3), 615–624 (1951)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin, H., Azuma, T., Unlu, M.B., Takagi, S.: Evaluation of adjoint methods in photoacoustic tomography with under-sampled sensors. In: Frangi, A.F., Schnabel, J.A., Davatzikos, C., Alberola-López, C., Fichtinger, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2018. LNCS, vol. 11070, pp. 73–81. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00928-1_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu, Y., Lew, M.S.: Learning relaxed deep supervision for better edge detection. In: CVPR, pp. 231–240 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maier, A., Syben, C., Lasser, T., Riess, C.: A gentle introduction to deep learning in medical image processing. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik 29, 86–101 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paige, C.C., Saunders, M.A.: LSQR: an algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares. ACM TOMS 8(1), 43–71 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rau, R., Unal, O., Schweizer, D., Vishnevskiy, V., Goksel, O.: Attenuation imaging with pulse-echo ultrasound based on an acoustic reflector. In: MICCAI (2016, accepted). arXiv:1906.11615
  13. 13.
    Sanabria, S.J., Goksel, O.: Hand-held sound-speed imaging based on ultrasound reflector delineation. In: Ourselin, S., Joskowicz, L., Sabuncu, M.R., Unal, G., Wells, W. (eds.) MICCAI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9900, pp. 568–576. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46720-7_66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sanabria, S.J., Ozkan, E., Rominger, M., Goksel, O.: Spatial domain reconstruction for imaging speed-of-sound with pulse-echo ultrasound: simulation and in vivo study. Phys. Med. Biol. 63(21), 215015 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sanabria, S., Rominger, M., Goksel, O.: Speed-of-sound imaging based on reflector delineation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 66(7), 1949–1962 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schwab, J., Antholzer, S., Haltmeier, M.: Learned backprojection for sparse and limited view photoacoustic tomography. In: Proceedings of SPIE Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing, p. 1087837 (2019)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Siewerdsen, J., et al.: Multimode C-arm fluoroscopy, tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT for image-guided interventions: from proof of principle to patient protocols. In: Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging, p. 65101A (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Soler, L., et al.: 3D image reconstruction for comparison of algorithm database: a patient specific anatomical and medical image database. Technical report. IRCAD, Strasbourg, France (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vishnevskiy, V., Sanabria, S.J., Goksel, O.: Image reconstruction via variational network for real-time hand-held sound-speed imaging. In: Knoll, F., Maier, A., Rueckert, D. (eds.) MLMIR 2018. LNCS, vol. 11074, pp. 120–128. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00129-2_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P., et al.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Würfl, T., et al.: Deep learning computed tomography: learning projection-domain weights from image domain in limited angle problems. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37(6), 1454–1463 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zheng, X., Ravishankar, S., Long, Y., Fessler, J.A.: PWLS-ULTRA: an efficient clustering and learning-based approach for low-dose 3D CT image reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37(6), 1498–1510 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer-assisted Applications in MedicineETH ZurichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations