Shade Resilient Total Cross Tied Configurations to Enhance Energy Yield of Photovoltaic Array Under Partial Shaded Conditions

  • S. MalathyEmail author
  • R. Ramaprabha
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 35)


Partial shading restrains the output of photovoltaic (PV) system, as mismatch losses are prominent when shade dispersion is uneven in an array. Partial shading (PS) is unavoidable in residential installations and it is therefore essential to improve the output under such conditions. Strategies that reconfigure the shaded panels or alter the interconnections are generally adopted to improve the yield under PS conditions. The static reconfiguration technique that is based on puzzle pattern has an edge over the dynamic technique as it voids the usage of sensors, switches and complicated computations and hence offers an efficient and economically viable solution in addressing the partial shading issues in small scale installations. This paper proposes three new shade resilient structures (SR1, SR2 and SR3) and analyses the performance under six different shading cases that mimic the real world shading scenarios.


Photovoltaic Partial shading Static reconfiguration Mismatch losses TCT Shade resilient 


  1. 1.
    Walker, L., Hofer, J., Schlueter, A.: High-resolution, parametric BIPV and electrical systems modeling and design. Appl. Energy 238, 164–179 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hashim, N., Salam, Z.: Critical evaluation of soft computing methods for maximum power point tracking algorithms of photovoltaic systems. Int. J. Power Electron. Drive Syst. 10(1), 548–561 (2019)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bahrami, M., Gavagsaz-Ghoachani, R., Zandi, M., Phattanasak, M., Maranzanaa, G., Nahid-Mobarakeh, B., Pierfederici, S., Meibody-Tabar, F.: Hybrid maximum power point tracking algorithm with improved dynamic performance. Renew. Energy 130, 982–991 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lyden, S., Haque, M.E.: Modelling, parameter estimation and assessment of partial shading conditions of photovoltaic modules. J. Modern Power Syst. Clean Energy 7(1), 55–64 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tripathi, A.K., Aruna, M., Murthy, C.S.: Performance of a PV panel under different shading strengths. Int. J. Ambient Energy 40(3), 248–253 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malathy, S., Ramaprabha, R.: Comprehensive analysis on the role of array size and configuration on energy yield of photovoltaic systems under shaded conditions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 49, 672–679 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tatabhatla, V.M.R., Agarwal, A., Kanumuri, T.: Performance enhancement by shade dispersion of Solar Photo-Voltaic array under continuous dynamic partial shading conditions. J. Clean. Prod. 213, 462–479 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nasiruddin, I., Khatoon, S., Jalil, M.F., Bansal, R.C.: Shade diffusion of partial shaded PV array by using odd-even structure. Sol. Energy 181, 519–529 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tubniyom, C., Chatthaworn, R., Suksri, A., Wongwuttanasatian, T.: Minimization of losses in solar photovoltaic modules by reconfiguration under various patterns of partial shading. Energie 12(1), 24 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horoufiany, M., Ghandhari, R.: A new photovoltaic arrays fixed reconfiguration method for reducing effects of one-and two-sided mutual shading. J. Solar Energy Eng. 141(3), 031013 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    El Iysaouy, L., Lahbabi, M., Oumnad, A.: A novel magic square view topology of a PV system under partial shading condition. Energy Procedia 157, 1182–1190 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Horoufiany, M., Ghandhari, R.: A new photovoltaic arrays fixed reconfiguration method for reducing effects of one-and two-sided mutual shading. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 141(3), 031013 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malathy, S., Ramaprabha, R.: Reconfiguration strategies to extract maximum power from photovoltaic array under partially shaded conditions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 2922–2934 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of EngineeringChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations