Performance Appraisal System and Its Effectiveness on Employee’s Efficiency in Dairy Product Company

  • Manjula PattnaikEmail author
  • Balachandra Pattanaik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 35)


Performance appraisal is a systematic description. Performance appraisal is the most essential need for the company’s development, so that’s why it is considered as one of the important and essential topic in recent trend of research. It is the basis of employee’s development. It is essential to plan, design and implement a useful and suitable performance appraisal system in every company. This study is conducted to analyze the effectiveness of performance appraisal system in Dairy Product Company in Chennai, India. The sampling technique used in this research is convenient sampling. Both primary and secondary data are used in this study. The collected data were analyzed and tabulated in a sequential manner in proper tables and charts. Employee’s effective performance is estimated by using various Statistical tools used for analyzing the data are Karl Pearson’s correlation, Chi-square test, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, Mann Whitney test, Cohen’s kappa.


Performance appraisal Effectiveness Mann Whitney test Cohen’s Kappa test 


  1. 1.
    Stup, R.E., Hyde, J., Holden, L.A.: Relationships between selected human resource management practices and dairy farm performance. J. Dairy Sci. 89(3), 1116–1120 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brymer, R.A., Sirmon, D.G.: Pre-exit bundling, turnover of professionals, and firm performance. J. Manag. Stud. 55(1), 146–173 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bewley, J., Palmer, R.W., Jackson-Smith, D.B.: An overview of experiences of Wisconsin dairy farmers who modernized their operations. J. Dairy Sci. 84, 717–729 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hazlauskatte, R., Buciuniene, I.: The role of human resource and their management in the establishment of sustainable competitive advantage. Eng. Econ. 5(60), 78–84 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ford, S.A., Shonkwiler, J.S.: The effect of managerial ability on farm financial success. Agric. Resource Econ. Rev. 23, 150–157 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hadley, G.L., Harsh, S.B., Wolf, C.A.: Managerial and financial implications of major dairy farm expansions in Michigan and Wisconsin. J. Dairy Sci. 85, 2053–2064 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huselid, M.A.: The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of management journal 38, 635–672 (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xu, Y., Jiang, J.: Empirical research on relationship of caddies’ reward satisfaction, organizational commitment and turnover intention. Chin. Stud. 4(02), 56 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    SAS institute, SAS/STAT version 9.1, SAS Inc. Cary, NC (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stup, R.E.: Standard operating procedure: a writing guide. Penn State University Cooperative Extension, University ParkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Banerjee, S.: Performance appraisal practice and its effect on employees motivation, A study on agro based organization. IJMS V(3), 4 (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paula, D., Chanel, B.S.: Improving milk yield performance of crossbred cattle in North-eastern state of India. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev. 23, 69–75 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AccountingPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Department of ECEMettu UniversityMettuEthiopia

Personalised recommendations