Advertisement

Concluding Remarks on Social Entrepreneurship Theory Development, Teaching and Future Research

  • Arvind AshtaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Ashta concludes the book and looks at the “So What” question. How does this realistic theory make any difference to other social entrepreneurship theories, education and research? Ashta’s first significant contribution in this chapter is to highlight the reasons for dynamism that emerged from this book. Second, this work combines the work on social entrepreneurship with that on microfinance to enable a richer understanding of both. Ashta’s third contribution is to show how this relates to management education to stimulate growth of social enterprises and reinforcing the need to make the prospective social entrepreneur prepared for success and failure. The fourth contribution is to amplify on the areas of research that the series of broad propositions has highlighted.

Keywords

Social entrepreneur Social enterprise Dreams Story Impact Microfinance 

References

  1. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashta, A. (2016). Towards a Realistic Theory of Social Entrepreneurship: Selling Dreams to Society. Burgundy School of Business. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2861345.
  3. Ashta, A. (2019). Towards a Realistic Theory of Social Entrepreneurship (NGOs) Grounded on Microfinance Research: Selling Dreams to Society. Strategic Change: Briefings in Entrepreneurial Finance, 28(4), 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cherry, S. (1997). Before the National Health Service: Financing the Voluntary Hospitals, 1900–1939. The Economic History Review, 50(2), 305–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crompton, G., & Jupe, R. (2007). Network Rail—Forward or Backward? Not-for-Profit in British Transport. Business History, 49(6), 908–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dey, P., & Steyaert, C. (2018). Myth in Social Entrepreneurship Research: An Inquiry into Rationalist, Ideological and Dialectic Practices of Demystification. In P. Dey & C. Steyaert (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship: An Affirmative Critique (pp. 100–126). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. (2003 [1961]). Folie et déraison: Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique [Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reasons]. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Howorth, C., Smith, S. M., & Parkinson, C. (2012). Social Learning and Social Entrepreneurship Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 371–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kickul, J., Janssen-Selvadurai, C., & Griffiths, M. D. (2012). A Blended Value Framework for Educating the Next Cadre of Social Entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 479–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kummitha, R. K. R., & Majumdar, S. (2015). Dynamic Curriculum Development on Social Entrepreneurship—A Case Study of TISS. The International Journal of Management Education, 13(3), 260–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mills, C. W. (1959 [2000]). The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Pache, A.-C., & Chowdhury, I. (2012). Social Entrepreneurs as Institutionally Embedded Entrepreneurs: Toward a New Model of Social Entrepreneurship Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 494–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Parekh, N., & Ashta, A. (2018). An Institutional Logics Perspective to Evolution of Indian Microcredit Business Models. Strategic Change: Briefings in Entrepreneurial Finance, 27(4), 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Plaskoff, J. (2012). Building the Heart and the Mind: An Interview With Leading Social Entrepreneur Sarah Harris. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 432–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith, W. K., Besharov, M. L., Wessels, A. K., & Chertok, M. (2012). A Paradoxical Leadership Model for Social Entrepreneurs: Challenges, Leadership Skills, and Pedagogical Tools for Managing Social and Commercial Demands. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 463–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yunus, M. (2003). Banker to the Poor: Micro-Lending and the Battle Against World Poverty. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  17. Yunus, M. (2017). A World of Three Zeros: The New Economics of Zero Poverty, Zero Unemployment, and Zero Net Carbon Emissions. London, UK: Hachette.Google Scholar
  18. Yunxia, Z. H. U., Rooney, D., & Phillips, N. (2016). Practice-Based Wisdom Theory for Integrating Institutional Logics: A New Model for Social Entrepreneurship Learning and Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(3), 607–625.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zeller, M., & Meyer, R. L. (Eds.). (2002). The Triangle of Microfinance: Financial Sustainability, Outreach, and Impact. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Zietsma, C., & Tuck, R. (2012). First, Do No Harm: Evaluating Resources for Teaching Social Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 512–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CERENBurgundy School of BusinessDijonFrance

Personalised recommendations