Advertisement

What Are the Guiding Ethical Principles of Science Communication?

  • Fabien MedveckyEmail author
  • Joan Leach
Chapter

Abstract

Drawing on what has been so far discussed, this chapter turns face on to the task at hand and proposes a set of ethical principles of science communication. After reviewing existing effort to move science communication down the path of ethical principles, this chapter discusses ethics in an applied setting to make a case for why principlism and relational ethics are especially helpful in making headway into an ethics of science communication. The chapter then proposes four principles for an ethics of science communication, namely Utility (of the information communicated), Accuracy, Kairos and Generosity. These are each described and defined with reference to previous chapters.

Keywords

Ethics of science communication Principlism Relational ethics 

Bibliography

  1. Austin, W., Bergum, V., & Dossetor, J. (2008). Relational ethics. In Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 748–749). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Beurer-Zuellig, B., Fieseler, C., & Meckel, M. (2009). A descriptive inquiry into the corporate communication profession in Europe. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 270–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bostrom, N. (2011). Information hazards: A typology of potential harms from knowledge. Review of Contemporary Philosophy, 10, 44–79.Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, S. D. (2011). Is there a distinctive care ethics? Nursing Ethics, 18(2), 184–191.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733010389431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
  6. Keohane, R. O., Lane, M., & Oppenheimer, M. (2014). The ethics of scientific communication under uncertainty. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 13(4), 343–368.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594x14538570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Priest, S., Goodwin, J., & Dahlstrom, M. F. (2018). Ethics and practice in science communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Seethaler, S., Evans, J. H., Gere, C., & Rajagopalan, R. M. (2019). Science, values, and science communication: Competencies for pushing beyond the deficit model. Science Communication, 41(3), 378–388.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019847484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Spitzer, S. (2017). Five principles of holistic science communication. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/04/12/five-principles-of-holistic-science-communication.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.The Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations