Storytelling and Selling Science
A common refrain in science communication ‘how to’ guides and textbooks is ‘tell a story’. But what are the downstream ethical effects of narrativizing science? This chapter considers the ethical implications of three strategies for effective science communication—narrativizing, framing and selling. Thinking about narratives, stories and framing highlight two special issues, which point to what we might think of as ethical hybridity. Firstly, science communication there is an ethical hybridity in the science being communicated and the act of communicating it. A secondly, there is ethical hybridity because of the breadth of what comes under the umbrella of science communication, each with its own underlying values. The chapter closes by considering ethical systems in adjacent fields to see if these can provide a roadmap for science communication.
KeywordsStorytelling Narratives Framing Ethical hybridity
- Biba, E. (2017). Science celebrities: Where are the women? https://www.the-scientist.com/news-analysis/science-celebrities-where-are-the-women-31511.
- Fahy, D. (2015). The new celebrity scientists: Out of the lab and into the limelight. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Hawe, P. (2018). [Personal Correspondence].Google Scholar
- Long, M. C., Goldhaber, D., & Huntington-Klein, N. (2014, February). Do students’ college major choices respond to changes in wages. Paper presented at the National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research (CALDER) Research Conference, American Institutes of Research, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Nelkin, D. (1987). Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
- Global Neuroethics Summit Delegates, Rommelfanger, K. S., Jeong, S. J., Ema, A., Fukushi, T., Kasai, K., … Singh, I. (2018). Neuroethics Questions to Guide Ethical Research in the International Brain Initiatives. Neuron, 100(1), October 10, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nisbet, M. C., & Mooney, C. (2007). Framing science. Science, 316, 56.Google Scholar
- Olson, R. (2015). Houston, we have a narrative: Why science needs story. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Phiddian, E., Hoepner, J., & McKinnon, M. (2019). Can interactive science exhibits be used to communicate population health science concepts? Critical Public Health, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2019.1575948.