Science has a fraught relationship with values. Indeed, claims to the objectivity of science are still often heard. Taking the well-known Tuskegee study as a starting point, this chapter makes explicit the science, to be worthwhile and good science, not only can’t be value-free, but shouldn’t aim to be so. This leads into a discussion on various forms of values, namely sociocultural values, economic values and ethical values. Given the centrality of ethics to this book, special attention is given to ethical values, including a discussion on how different ways to apply ethics.
KeywordsValues in science Value Ethics
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). The Tuskegee timeline. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
- Longino, H. (2002). The social dimensions of scientific knowledge. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
- Rockwell, D. H., Yobs, A. R., & Moore, M. B., Jr. (1964). The Tuskegee study of untreated syphilis: The 30th year of observation. JAMA Internal Medicine, 114(6), 792–798. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1964.03860120104011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Singer, P. (1994). Ethics: Oxford readers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Stephan, P. E. (2012). How economics shapes science (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar