Is Science Communication Ethical? A Question of Justice
So far this book has focused on the ethics of science communication practice, culminating in a set of proposed principles for the field. This chapter takes a different tack and looks at the ethics of the field of science communication as a whole; is there something specifically moral about science communication as a field. The chapter considers oft-repeated claims that there is an anti-science crisis and a science communication crisis and argues there is no such crisis. There maybe an epistemic crisis, or an expert-trust crisis, but these stretch far beyond science. The chapter then looks at the effect of presenting these crises as being specifically about science on other fields of knowledge and to the social imagining of what good knowledge is.
KeywordsScience communication Epistemic justice Anti-science Crisis discipline
- Funk, C., & Kenned, B. (2019). Public confidence in scientists has remained stable for decades. PEW Research Center. From https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/03/22/public-confidence-in-scientists-has-remained-stable-for-decades/.
- Funk, C., Smith, G., & Masci, D. (2019). How many creationists are there in America? Scientific American. From https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/how-many-creationists-are-there-in-america/.
- Morton, J. (2018). Brian Cox: Why anti-science is a threat to our democracy. NZ Herald. From https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12052496.
- Parker, K., Morin, R., & Menasce Horowitz, J. (2019). 2. Worries, priorities and potential problem-solvers: Looking to the future, public sees an America in decline on many fronts. PEW Research Center. From https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2019/03/21/worries-priorities-and-potential-problem-solvers/.
- Schulman, J. (2019). The 2018 list of the worst in anti-science. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. From https://thebulletin.org/2019/01/the-2018-list-of-the-worst-in-anti-science/.
- Smol, J. P. (2018). A crisis in science literacy and communication: Does reluctance to engage the public make academic scientists complicit?. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Science Publishing.Google Scholar