The Future of ISA, Mentoring and Professional Development

  • Graham PassmoreEmail author
  • Amanda Turner
  • Julie Prescott


Linking to the previous chapter, this chapter considers literature around career motivation, organisational commitment and identification and how these relate to professional development and retention for student teachers. The main body of the chapter presents the analysis of the time 3, ISA and mentorship session (the second mentorship session and the third ISA analysis). The concluding section of the chapter considers the future of ISA and professional development by considering how ISA may be utilised as a tool for enhancing the supervision sessions of trainee counsellors.


Career motivation Student teacher retention Commitment 


  1. American Psychological Association. (2014). Guidelines and principles for accreditation of programs in professional psychology: Quick reference guide to internship programs. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. Alvesson, M., Ashcraft, L. K., & Thomas, R. (2008). Identity matters: Reflecting on the constructions of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization, 15(5), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. A. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Psychological Society. (2003). Guidelines on supervision. Australian Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  5. Bamford, S., & Worth, J. (2017). Teacher retention and turnover research. Research update 3: Is the grass greener beyond teaching? Slough: NFER.Google Scholar
  6. Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.Google Scholar
  7. Bieler, D. (2013). Strengthening new teacher agency through holistic mentoring. English Journal, 102(3), 23–32.Google Scholar
  8. British Psychological Society. (2005). Division of counselling psychology: Professional practice guidelines. British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  9. De Stefano, J., D’Iuso, N., Blake, E., Fitzpatrick, M., Drapeau, M., & Chamodraka, M. (2007). Trainees’ experiences of impasses in counselling and the impact of group supervision on their resolution: A pilot study. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 7(1), 42–47. Scholar
  10. Elsbach, K. D. (1999). An expanded model of organizational identification. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 163–200.Google Scholar
  11. Haslam, S. A., Powell, C., & Turner, J. C. (2000). Social identity, self-categorization, and work motivation: Rethinking the contribution of the group to positive and sustainable organizational outcomes. International Review of Applied Psychology, 49, 319–339.Google Scholar
  12. Hill, C. E., & Knox, S. (2013). Training and supervision in psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change (6th ed., pp. 775–812). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational context. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hong, J. Y. (2010). Pre-service and beginning teachers’ professional identity and its relation to dropping out of the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1530–1543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Inman, A. G., Hutman, H., Pendse, A., Devdas, L., Luu, L., & Ellis, M. V. (2014). Current trends concerning supervisors, supervisees, and clients in clinical supervision. In C. E. Watkins, Jr. & D. Milne (Eds.), Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 61–102). Oxford, UK: Wiley.
  16. London, M., & Stumpf, S. A. (1982). Managing careers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  17. Meyer, J., & Allen, N. (1991). A three component conceptualisation of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morgan, M. M., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2007). Toward a common-factors approach to supervision. Journal of Martial and Family Therapy, 13, 1–17. Scholar
  19. Paige, S., & Wosket, V. (2015). Supervising the counsellor and psychotherapist: A cyclical model (3rd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Quigley, N. R., & Tymon, W. G. (2006). Toward an integrated model of intrinsic motivation and career self-management. Career Development International, 11(6), 522–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of inter-group relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of social conflict. In W. Austen & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group relations (2nd ed.). Chicago: Nelson Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517.Google Scholar
  24. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, P. J., & Wetherall, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Schmitt, N., Cortina, J. M., Ingerick, M. J., & Wiechmann, D. (2003). Personnel selection and employee performance. In W. C. Borman, D. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 77–106). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Sveningsson, S., & Alvesson, M. (2003). Managing managerial identities. Human Relations, 56(10), 1163–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., & Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171–191.Google Scholar
  28. Van Knippenberg, D., & van Schie, E. C. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(2), 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Watkins, E. C. (2017). How does psychotherapy supervision work? Contributions of connection, conception, allegiance, alignment and action. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 27(2), 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Watkins, C. E., Jr., Budge, S. L., & Callahan, J. L. (2015). Common and specific factors converging in psychotherapy supervision: A supervisory extrapolation of the Wampold/Budge psychotherapy relationship model. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 25, 214–235. Scholar
  31. Watkins, C. E., Jr., & Scaturo, D. J. (2013). Toward an integrative, learning-based model of psychological interventions, and supervisee learning/relearning. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23, 75–95. Scholar
  32. Weinreich, P. (2003). Theory and practice: Introduction. In P. Weinreich & W. Saunderson (Eds.), Analysing identity: Clinical, societal and cross-cultural contexts (pp. 1–5). London and New York: Taylor & Francis, Routledge, and Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  33. Wheeler, S. (2004). A review of supervisor training in the UK. In I. Fleming & L. Steen (Eds.), Supervision and clinical psychology: Theory, practice and perspectives (pp. 15–35). East Sussex: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Wheeler, S., & Richards, K. (2007). The impact of clinical supervision on counselors and therapists, their practice and their clients: A systematic review of the literature. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 7, 54–65. Scholar
  35. Wilson, H. M. N., Davies, J. A., & Weatherhead, S. (2016). Trainee therapists’ experiences of supervision during training: A meta-synthesis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 23, 340–351.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham Passmore
    • 1
    Email author
  • Amanda Turner
    • 2
  • Julie Prescott
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationLakehead UniversityThunder BayCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of Education and PsychologyUniversity of BoltonBoltonUK

Personalised recommendations