Advertisement

Cognitive Modeling of the Mechanism of Partnership of Business Entities with Public Authorities

  • Veronica S. EpininaEmail author
  • Iakow I. Kayl
  • Roman M. Lamzin
  • Anzhelika N. Syrbu
  • Yurij M. Kvintyuk
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 91)

Abstract

The paper deals with special aspects of management and effective functioning of the mechanism of partnership of business entities with public authorities. It has been substantiated that at the current stage of development of economic and social relations, the goal of their regulation which is common for business entities and public authorities consists in the fixation of the limits of government (municipal) intervention in entrepreneurial activities, as well as priorities of participation of the state in certain market segments. It has been proved that the interaction between business entities and public authorities makes provision for mutual interest. The formation of such a stable and reliable partnership ensures, among other things, the integrity of the economic space and the improvement of the business climate. It has been suggested that the cognitive approach can be used as a tool for the study of partnership of business entities with public authorities and modeling of the mechanism. Based on the research findings, the authors have put forward their guidelines for achieving the target values of development of the mechanism of partnership of business entities with public authorities in the Russian Federation.

Keywords

Cognitive modeling GR management Partnership Mechanism Efficiency Interaction between business entities and public authorities 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The reported study was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant No. 19-010-00103 “Cognitive modeling of innovative mechanism of partnership of business entities and public authorities (GR-management) in the conditions of digitalization”.

References

  1. Axelrod, R.: The analysis of cognitive maps. In: Axelrod, R. (ed.) Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites, p. 395. Princeton, Princeton University Press (1976)Google Scholar
  2. Busemeyer, J.R., Diederich, A.: Cognitive Modeling, p. 225. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2010)Google Scholar
  3. Dibie, R.A., Dibie, J., Quadri, O.M.: Business and Government Relations in Kenya. Business and Government Relations in Africa, pp. 340–370. Taylor and Francis (2017)Google Scholar
  4. Gabsa, W.: Business and Government Relations in Cameroon. Business and Government Relations in Africa, pp. 291–313. Taylor and Francis (2017)Google Scholar
  5. Gadzekpo, L.: Government and Business Relations in Ghana. Business and Government Relations in Africa, pp. 132–146. Taylor and Francis (2017)Google Scholar
  6. Gorelova, G.V., Zakharova, E.N., Martyshina, T.V., Pankratova, N.D.: Cognitive process modeling of sustainable regional development. Bull. ASU 2, 166–174 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. Holt, D.V., Osman, M.: Approaches to cognitive modeling in dynamic systems control. Front. Psychol 8, 2032 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hussien, M., Dibie, R.A.: Business and Government Relations in Sudan. Business and Government Relations in Africa, pp. 162–195. Taylor and Francis (2017)Google Scholar
  9. Igbokwe-Ibeto, C.J.: Business and Government Relations in Tanzania. Business and Government Relations in Africa, pp. 314–339. Taylor and Francis (2017)Google Scholar
  10. Kawewe, S., Dibie, R.A.: Business and Government Relations in Zimbabwe. Business and Government Relations in Africa, pp. 196–219. Taylor and Francis (2017)Google Scholar
  11. Kayl, I.I., Lamzin, R.M., Epinina, V.S.: GR-management: realities and prospects of development. Fundam. Res. 9–3, 597–600 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. Klochko, E.N., Prokhorova, V.V.: GR-management as a tool for business community interaction with government authorities. Econ. Entrepreneurship 6–2, 831–834 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. Kostikova, A.V., Tereliansky, P.V., Shuvaev, A.V., Parakhina, V.N., Timoshenko, P.N.: Expert fuzzy modeling of dynamic properties of complex systems. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 11(17), 10601–10608 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. Lapina, N., Chirikova, A.: Regional Elites in the Russian Federation: Behaviors and Political Orientations, p. 129 (1999)Google Scholar
  15. Laskowskaya, T.A., Saveliev, E.P., Lindina, T.A.: Theoretical bases of modeling of interactions in the construction industry based on the cognitive approach. Bull. Chelyabinsk State University 7, 24 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. Lewandowsky, S., Farrell, S.: Computational Modeling in Cognition: Principles and Practice, p. 365. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2010)Google Scholar
  17. Makarenko, D.I., Khrustalev, E.U.: Cognitive technologies in the theory and practice of management. Prob. Theory Pract. Manag. 4, 25–33 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. Moseyko, V.O., Korobov, S.A., Tarasov, A.V.: Cognitive modeling in the formation of management decisions: the potential of resource-factor analysis. Creative Econ. 5, 629–644 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nur, Y.A.: Business and Government Relations in Somalia. Business and Government Relations in Africa, pp. 147–161. Taylor and Francis (2017)Google Scholar
  20. Pachur, T., Scheibehenne, B.: Unpacking buyer-seller differences in valuation from experience: a cognitive modeling approach. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 24, 1742–1773 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Perepelitsa, G.V.: Improving the interaction of business and government in the modern economy. Russ. Entrepreneurship 8, 28–32 (2006)Google Scholar
  22. Plotnikova, N.A.: Features of the interaction of business and government in the regulation of socio-economic problems of the territory. Concept S28, 56–60 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. Prezenski, S., Brechmann, A.: A cognitive modeling approach to strategy formation in dynamic decision making. Front. Psychol. 8, 1335 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Prokhorova, V.V.: Cognitive modeling of sustainable economic development of an enterprise. Econ. Manag. 1, 24–25 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. Ragulina, Y.V., Stroiteleva, E.V., Miller, A.I.: Modeling of integration processes in the business structures. Modern Appl. Sci. 9(3), 145–158 (2015)Google Scholar
  26. Turovsky, R.F.: Regional models of interaction between business and government elites: modern processes and their socio-political consequences. Final analytical report, p. 42 (2010)Google Scholar
  27. Yasin, E.: Burden of the state and economic policy. Questions Econ. 11, 7–10 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Veronica S. Epinina
    • 1
    Email author
  • Iakow I. Kayl
    • 2
  • Roman M. Lamzin
    • 2
  • Anzhelika N. Syrbu
    • 2
  • Yurij M. Kvintyuk
    • 2
  1. 1.Volgograd State UniversityVolgogradRussia
  2. 2.Volgograd State Socio-Pedagogical UniversityVolgogradRussia

Personalised recommendations