Electronic-Digital Smart Contracts: Modernization of Legal Tools for Foreign Economic Activity

  • Agnessa O. InshakovaEmail author
  • Alexander I. Goncharov
  • Daniil A. Salikov
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 91)


The article explores the possibilities of improving the methods of managing foreign economic activity and increasing its efficiency with the help of smart contracts. The advantages of the blockchain technology and the legal contradictions associated with the use of smart contracts in the practice of economic entities are analyzed. The methodological basis consists of the authors’ materialistic, positivistic worldview, general scientific methods of cognition, a number of special legal methods. The purpose of the study is to search for improvements in the legal support of electronic interaction of participants in foreign economic activity, registration of facts of property relations between them, which can be executed by smart contracts. As a result of the study, it was substantiated that a smart contract can neutralize many civil law problems, including questions about applicable law, judicial jurisdiction, verification of counterparty powers. Based on the analysis, it was substantiated the conclusion that neither at the domestic (national) level of legislation, nor at the international level within the framework of universal or regional agreements, a coherent systemic matter of legal norms regulating the conditions, procedure and limits of use of smart contracts was created.


Smart contract Blockchain Distributed registry Electronic registration Foreign economic activity International trade transactions 

JEL code

K10 K15 К24 



The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project No. 18-29-16132.


  1. Braginskij, M.I., Vitrjanskij, V.V.: Contract Law: General Provisions, 3rd edn., p. 848. Statut, Moscow (2001)Google Scholar
  2. Draft Federal Law No. 419059-7 On Digital Financial Assets dated 25/01/2018. Minfin.
  3. Federal law No. 183-FZ On export controls. Dated 18.07.1999. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 146 (1999)Google Scholar
  4. Federal law No. 63-FZ On Electronic signature. Dated 06.04.2011. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 75 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. Fedorov, D.V.: Tokens, cryptocurrency and smart contracts in domestic bills from the perspective of foreign experience. Civil Law Bull. 2, 30–74 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geiregat, S.: Cryptocurrencies are (smart) contracts. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 34, 1144–1149 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giancaspro, M.: Is a ‘smart contract’ really a smart idea? Insights from a legal perspective. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 33, 825–835 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huckle, S., Bhattacharya, R., White, M., Beloff, N.: Internet of things, blockchain and shared economy applications. Procedia Comput. Sci. 98, 461–466 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Inshakova, A.O.: International Private Law, p. 398. Jurait, Moscow (2018)Google Scholar
  10. Inshakova, A.O., Goncharov, A.I.: The imperatives of financial policy in the sphere of the digital economy: impacts on increasing investment activity and tax potential of Russian regions. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference «Competitive, Sustainable and Secure Development of the Regional Economy: Response to Global Challenges» (CSSDRE 2018), pp. 337–342. Atlantis Press, Amsterdam (2018)Google Scholar
  11. Kislyj, V.A.: Legal aspects of the use of the blockchain and the use of cryptoactives. (2017).
  12. Macrinici, D., Cartofeanu, C., Gao, S.: Smart contract applications within blockchain technology: a systematic mapping study. Telemat. Inform. (2018).
  13. Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1632-P On approval of the program “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation” dated 28.07.2017.
  14. Reyna, A., Martín, C., Chen, J., Soler, E., Díaz, M.: On blockchain and its integration with IoT. Challenges and opportunities. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 88, 173–190 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Savelyev, A.I.: Contract Law 2.0: «Smart» Contracts as the Beginning of the End of Classic Contract Law. SSRN, 71 (2016).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Volgograd State UniversityVolgogradRussia

Personalised recommendations