Advertisement

Towards a Novel Maintenance Support System Based On mini-terms: Mini-term 4.0

  • Eduardo García
  • Nicolás MontesEmail author
  • Mónica Alacreu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 613)

Abstract

This paper presents how to design a novel Maintenance Support System (MSS) to prognostic breakdowns in production lines based on mini-terms, well known as a Mini-term 4.0. The system is based on the real time sub-cycle time (mini-term) monitorization and how the mini-term variability can be used as a fault detection indicator. Mini-terms and micro-terms were introduced in our previous work as a machine subdivision. A mini-term subdivision can be selected by the expert team for several reasons, the replacement of a machine part or simply to analyze the machine more adequately. (A micro-term is a component from a mini-term and it can be as small as the user wishes. Mini-terms are able to detect the same physical deterioration phenomenon than common sensor but with an important advantage, it is easy and cheap to install. It is cheap because do not require any additional hardware installation to measure the sub-cycle time, just use the PLC and sensors installed for the automated production process, and easy because only requires to code extra timers into the PLC. Mini-terms are nowadays implanted at Ford factories around the world where a learning process is established to enrich the knowledge of the system. The system detects change points and sends an e-mail to the maintenance workers. They repair the machine and report the pathology detected to the system. Real cases are shown at the end of the paper.

Keywords

Knowledge-driven support system Maintenance prognosis mini-term Change point Mini-term 4.0 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Ford España S.L and in particular Almussafes Factory for the support in the present research.

References

  1. 1.
    Battaia O, Dolgui A (2013) A taxonomy of line balancing problems and their solution approaches. Int J Prod Econ 142(2):259–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.10.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li L, Djurdjanovic D, Ni J (2007) Maintenance task priorization using data driven bottleneck detection and maintenance opportunity windows. In: ASME 2007 international conference on manufacturing science and engineering, pp 517–523.  https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2007-31150
  3. 3.
    Jardine AKS, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signals Process 20(7):1483–1510.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Son KL, Fouladirad M, Barros A, Levrat E, Lung B (2013) Remaining useful life estimation based on stochastic deterioration models: a comparative study. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 112:165–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.11.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang Q (2005) Supervisory factory control based on real-time production feedback. PhDGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leal F, da Silva R, Montevechi J, de Almeida D, Silva F (2011) A practical guide for operational validation of discrete simulation models. Pesquisa Oper 31:57–77.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-74382011000100005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li L, Chang Q, Ni J, Biller S (2009) Real time production improvement through bottleneck control. Int J Prod Res 47(21):6145–6158.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540802244240CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    López CE (2014) Unbalanced workload allocation in large assembly lines. PhDGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garcia E (2016) Análisis de los sub-tiempos de ciclo técnico para la mejora del rendimiento de las líneas de fabricación. PhDGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Negnevitsky M (2005) Artificial intelligence: a guide to intelligent systems. Pearson EducationGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nemati HR, Steiger DM, Lyer LS, Herschel RT (2002) Knowledge warehouse: an architectural integration of knowledge management, decision support, artificial intelligence and data warehousing. Decis Support Syst 33(2):143–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00141-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chakir A, Chergui M, Elhasnaou S, Medromi H, Sayouti A (2016) A decision approach to select the best framework to treat an it problem by using multi-agent systems and expert systems. In: Advances in ubiquitous networking, pp 499–511.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-990-540
  13. 13.
    Felsberger A, Bernhard O, Gerald R (2016) A review of decision support systems for manufacturing systems. In: The international conference on knowledge technologies and data-driven business 2016 - i-KNOW 2016, pp 499–511Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murthadha M, Banaz A (2013) Knowledge-driven decision support system based on knowledge warehouse and data mining for market management. J Manag Bus Res 13(10):2249–2288Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deshpande RR, Demarco J, Sayre JW, Liu BJ (2016) Knowledge-driven decision support for assessing dose distributions in radiation therapy of head and neck cancer. Int J Comput Assistant Radiol Surg 11(11):2071–2083.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1403-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Muhammad SH, Ebrahim Z, Mahmood WHW, Rahman MN (2017) Decision support system classification and its application in manufactoring sector: a review. Int Jurnal Teknologi 79(1):153–163.  https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.7689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garcia E, Montes N (2017) A Tensor Model for Automated Production Lines based on Probabilistic Sub-Cycle Times. Nova Science Publishers 18(1):221–234Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhao X, Cai K, Wang X, Song Y (2018) Optimal replacement policies for a shock model with a change point. Comput Ind Eng 118:383–393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nigro MB, Pakzad SN, Dorvash S (2014) Localized structural damage detection: a change point analysis. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 29:416–432.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chakir A, Chergui M, Elhasnaou S, Medromi H, Sayouti A (2016) A decision approach to select the best framework to treat an it problem by using multi-agent system and expert systems. In: Advances in ubiquitous networking, pp 499–511 . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-990-5_40Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ahmad R, Kamaruddini S (2012) An overview of time-based and condition-based maintenance in industrial application. Comput Ind Eng 63(1):135–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garcia E, Montes N, Alacreu M (2018) Towards a knowledge-driven maintenance support system for manufacturing lines. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on informatics in control, automation and robotics (ICINCO 2018), vol 1, pp 43–54. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006834800430054

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo García
    • 1
  • Nicolás Montes
    • 2
    Email author
  • Mónica Alacreu
    • 2
  1. 1.Ford SpainAlmussafesSpain
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, Physics and Technological SciencesUniversity CEU Cardenal HerreraAlfara del PatriarcaSpain

Personalised recommendations