Advertisement

Features of Fluid-Dynamic Processes in a Seismically Active Region (Case Study of Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia)

  • Galina KopylovaEmail author
  • Svetlana Boldina
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences book series (SPEES)

Abstract

The effects of 19 earthquakes (Mw = 6.8−9.0, epicentral distances 80–14600 km) are considered on data of long-term precision water level observations in the YuZ-5 well, Kamchatka Peninsula. Four types of water level variations were identified: I—oscillations, II—oscillations with short-term rise, III—short-term rises, IV—long-term decreases. Manifestations of the selected types of water level variations are determined by the intensity of seismic impact corresponding to the ratio of magnitude and earthquake’s epicentral distance, the calculated values of specific density of energy in seismic wave, maximum velocity and amplitude-frequency composition of maximum phases in the earthquake record, obtained from broadband seismic waveforms at the nearest station. Dynamic deformation of water-bearing rocks during the passage of seismic waves is accompanied by different hydrogeodynamic processes in the “well—water-bearing rock” system including amplification of water pressure variations in the wellbore, short-term impulses of pressure near the wellbore, water pressure decrease at distances up to hundreds of meters from the well due to increased permeability of water-bearing rocks during intense shocks. Based on water level variations modelling, we show evaluation criteria for possibility of their occurrences. These criteria include the presence of certain frequencies in composition of seismic wave (oscillations), values of amplitudes and relaxation times of water pressure impulses (short-term level rises), presence of geological objects with variable permeability in the vicinity of the well.

Keywords

Well Water level Earthquakes Kamchatka peninsula 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project 18-05-00337.

References

  1. 1.
    Boldina, S.V., Kopylova, G.N.: Effects of the January 30, 2016, Mw = 7.2 Zhupanovsky earthquake on the water level variations in wells YuZ-5 and E-1 in Kamchatka. Geodyn. Tectonophys. 8(4), 863–880 (2017). (in Russian)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bower, D., Heaton, K.: Response of an aquifer near Ottawa to tidal forcing and the Alaskan earthquake of 1964. Can. J. Earth Sci. 15, 331–340 (1978)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brodsky, E.E., Roeloffs, E., Woodcock, D., Gall, I., Manga, M.A.: A mechanism for sustained groundwater pressure changes induced by distant earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2390–2400 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cooper, H.H., Bredehoeft, J.D., Papadopulos, I.S., Bennet, R.R.: The response of well-aquifer system to seismic waves. J. Geophys. Res. 70, 3915–3926 (1965)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gomberg, J., Felzer, K., Brodsky, E.: Earthquake dynamic triggering and ground motion scaling. In: 4th International Workshop on Statistical Seismology on Proceedings, pp. 45–51. Kanagawa, Japan (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kanamori, H., Brodsky, E.E.: The physics of earthquakes. Rep. Prog. Phys. 67, 1429–1496 (2004)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kocharyan, G.G., Vinogradov, E.A., Gorbunova, E.M., Markov, V.K., Markov, D.V., Pernik, L.M.: Hydrologic response of underground reservoirs to seismic vibrations. Izvestiya Phys. Solid Earth 47(12), 1071–1082 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kopylova, G.N., Boldina, S.V.: The response of water level in the YuZ-5 well, Kamchatka to the magnitude 9.3, Sumatra–Andaman earthquake of december 26, 2004. J. Volcanol. Seismol. 1(5), 319–327 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kopylova, G.N., Boldina, S.V., Smirnov, A.A., Chubarova, E.G.: Experience in registration of variations caused by strong earthquakes in the level and physicochemical parameters of ground waters in the piezometric wells: the case of Kamchatka. Seism. Instrum. 53(4), 286–295 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Riznichenko, YuV: The source dimensions of the crustal earthquakes and the seismic moment, in Issled po fizike zemletryasenii (Studies in Earthquake Physics). Nauka, Moscow (1976). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roeloffs, E.A.: Persistent water level changes in a well near Parkfield, California, due to local and distant earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. 103(B1), 869–889 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, C.-Y., Manga, M.: Earthquakes and Water. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences 114. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kamchatka Branch of the Geophysical Survey of the Russian Academy of SciencesPetropavlovsk-KamchatskyRussia

Personalised recommendations