Apparent Permeability Loss Over Time in Long-Term Measurements Using the Steady-State Method

  • Nikolay BaryshnikovEmail author
  • Evgeniy Zenchenko
  • Sergey Turuntaev
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences book series (SPEES)


The paper analyzes possible causes of time trends observed under constant net confining stresses in long-term measurements of low-permeable sample permeabilities. Experimental study of flow in a limestone core sample was conducted. During the experiment with duration of 40 days, the fluid pumping was carried out in several stages with different constant values of the confining pressure and the pore pressure gradient. As a result, the permeability of the sample decreased by 10 times. It was shown that such significant decrease in the permeability in time can be caused by clogging of the sample pore space. The additional experiment with sequential pumping of single-phase gas and liquid through the sample showed that the gas contained in the flow of liquid can act as a dispersed phase that clogs pores. The estimations show that even very low particle concentrations at large time periods lead to significant decrease in the permeability. The possibility of clogging of core sample pore space must be considered when conducting long-term experiments on study of the permeability by the steady-state method.


Permeability Clogging Steady-state flow method Long-term Experimental study 



The work was supported by the state task (project No. 0146-2019-0007).


  1. 1.
    Kwon, O., Kronenberg, A.K., Gangi, A.F., Johnson, B.: Permeability of Wilcox shale and its effective pressure law. J. Geophys. Res. 106(B9), 19339–19353 (2001). Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sone, H., Zoback, M.D.: Visco-plastic properties of shale gas reservoir rocks. American Rock Mechanics Association (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Almasoodi, M.M., Abousleiman, Y.N., Hoang, S.K.: Viscoelastic Creep of Eagle Ford Shale: Investigating Fluid-Shale Interaction. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2014).
  4. 4.
    Chhatre, S.S., Braun, E.M., Sinha, S., Determan, M.D., Passey, Q.R., Zirkle, T.E., … Kudva, R.A.: Steady-State Stress-Dependent Permeability Measurements of Tight Oil-Bearing Rocks. Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Noort, R., Yarushina, V.: Water, CO2 and Argon permeabilities of intact and fractured shale cores under stress. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 52, 299 (2019). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baryshnikov, N.A., Zenchenko, E.V., Turuntaev, S.B.: The change in the permeability of an ultra-low permeable limestone sample under the Influence of confining pressure during the loading-unloading cycle. In: Karev, V., Klimov, D., Pokazeev, K. (eds.) Physical and Mathematical Modeling of Earth and Environment Processes (2018). Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Cham (2019), Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herzig, J.P., Leclerc, D.M., Le, P.: Flow of Suspensions through porous media—application to deep filtration. Goff Ind. Eng. Chem. 62(5), 8–35 (1970). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mikhailov, D.N., Ryzhikov, N.I., Shako, V.V.: Experimental investigation of transport and accumulation of solid particle and clay suspensions in rock samples. Fluid Dyn. 50(5), 691–704 (2015). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wong, R.C.K., Mettananda, D.C.A.: Permeability reduction in Qishn sandstone specimens due to Particle suspension injection. Transp. Porous Med. 81, 105 (2010). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abrams, A.: Mud design to minimize rock impairment due to particle invasion. J. Pet. Technol. 29(May), 586–592 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sadovsky Institute of Geospheres Dynamics RASMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations