Advertisement

Fault Complexity and Interaction: Evidence of Static Earthquake Triggering

  • Eleftheria PapadimitriouEmail author
  • Vasileios Karakostas
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences book series (SPEES)

Abstract

Fault interaction investigation was performed in several cases on a regional scale by evaluating stress patterns for different configurations based on specific natural fault arrays. Coseismic Coulomb stress changes that are induced on the surrounding receiver faults by the earthquake on the source fault and in several cases the accumulated stress changes that included the long-term tectonic loading have revealed. Triggering occurs as a redistribution of stress induced by an earthquake. One of the primary reasons to study earthquake triggering is to work toward being able to predict where the next seismic event will occur. Triggered event can happen very fast, after several years, or after decades. Research results that successfully highlighted triggering effects are accumulated from several cases from Greece and other areas and for different faulting types.

Keywords

Fault population Interaction and triggering Coulomb stress changes 

References

  1. 1.
    King, G.C.P., Stein, R.S., Lin, J.: Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, 935–953 (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gomberg, J., Beeler, N.M., Blanpied, M.L., Bodin, P.: Earthquake triggering by transient and static deformations. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 24411–24426 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Okada, Y.: Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 82, 1018–1040 (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scholz, C.: The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting. Cambridge University Press (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harris, R.A.: Introduction to special session: stress triggers, stress shadows, and implications for seismic hazard. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 24347–24358 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rice, J., Cleary, M.: Some basic stress diffusion solutions for fluid saturated elastic porous media with compressible constituents. Rev. Geophys. 14, 227–241 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roeloffs, E.: Poroelastic techniques in the study of earthquake–related hydrologic phenomena. Adv. Geophys. 37, 135–195 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beeler, N.M., Simpson, R.W., Hickman, S.H., Lockner, D.A.: Pore fluid pressure, apparent friction and Coulomb failure. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 25533–25542 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deng, J., Sykes, L.: Evolution of the stress field in Southern California and triggering of moderate size earthquakes: A 200-year perspective. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 9859–9886 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stein, R.: The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence. Nature 402, 605–609 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Papadimitriou, E.E., Sykes, L.R.: Evolution of the stress field in the Northern Aegean Sea (Greece). Geophys. J. Int. 146, 747–759 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Papadimitriou, E.E.: Mode of strong earthquake occurrence in central Ionian Islands (Greece). Possible triggering due to Coulomb stress changes generated by the occurrence of previous strong shocks. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 3293–3308 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Papadimitriou, E., Karakostas, V., Mesimeri, M., Chouliaras, G., Kourouklas, C.: The Mw6.7 17 November 2015 Lefkada (Greece) earthquake: structural interpretation by means of aftershock analysis. Pure Appl. Geophys (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1601-3ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Papadimitriou, E.E., Wen, X., Karakostas, V.G., Xueshen, J.: Earthquake triggering along the Xianshuihe fault zone of western Sichuan. Pure Appl. Geophys. 161, 1683–1707 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Papadimitriou, E.E., Karakostas, V.G.: Episodic occurrence of strong (Mw ≥  6.2) earthquakes in Thessalia area (central Greece). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 215, 395–409 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Papadimitriou, E.E., Sourlas, G., Karakostas, V.G.: Seismicity variations in southern Aegean, Greece, before and after the large (M7.7) 1956 Amorgos earthquake due to the evolving stress. Pure Appl. Geophys. 162, 783–804 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Papadimitriou, E., Karakostas, V., Tranos, M., Ranguelov, B., Gospodinov, D.: Static stress changes associated with normal faulting earthquakes in South Balkan area. Intern. J. Earth Sci. (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-006-0139-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Das, S., Scholz, C.H.: Off-fault aftershock clusters caused by shear stress increase? Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 71, 1669–1675 (1981)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karakostas, V.G., Papadimitriou, E.E., Karakaisis, G.F., Papazachos, C.B., Scordilis, E.M., Vargemezis, G., Aidona, E.: The 2001 Skyros, northern Aegean, Greece, earthquake sequence: off fault aftershocks, tectonic implications and seismicity triggering. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30(1), 1012 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015814ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karakostas, V.G., Papadimitriou, E.E., Gospodinov, D.: Modeling the 2013 North Aegean (Greece) seismic sequence: geometrical and frictional constraints, and aftershock probabilities. Geophys. J. Intern. (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt523ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geophysics Department, School of GeologyAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations