The Journey Technique as a Method for Consciousness Studies

  • Karel James Bouse


This chapter examines the manner in which using recorded Neo-shamanic journeys as part of a formal research setting could provide a relatively clean phenomenological and replicable data-gathering device for psychologists studying consciousness and anomalous phenomena. The unique neuropsychology of the shamanic journey enables someone in the journey state to perceive anomalous phenomena while simultaneously retaining focus and relative control of the journey and narrate the journey out loud into a recording device as the journey unfolds. The recording provides a phenomenological account of journey phenomena and experiences usually imperceptible in normal waking consciousness prior to the data being compromised by the interpretative and meaning-making processes of the participants. This chapter presents a possible research protocol that utilizes recorded shamanic journeys in a research environment.


Neo-shamanic journey Research protocol Phenomenology Data gathering Consciousness studies Parapsychology 


  1. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1996). The social construction of reality: A treatise on the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar
  2. Bouse, K. (2017). Neo-shamanism as a developmental, spiritual matrix for contemporary magical discovery and practice (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (No. 10742675).Google Scholar
  3. Carkhuff, R. (2009). The art of helping (9th ed.). Amherst, MA: Possibilities Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic.Google Scholar
  5. Harner, M. (1982). The way of the shaman. New York, NY: Bantam.Google Scholar
  6. Harner, M. (2005). The history and work of the Foundation for Shamanic Studies. Shamanism (25th Anniversary Issue), 18(1–2). Available at
  7. Harner, S. (2005). Presence in existential-humanistic psychotherapy and in the shamanic journey. International Institute for Humanistic Studies.
  8. Krippner, S., & Achterberg, J. (2014). Anomalous healing experiences. In E. Cardena, S. Lynn, & S. Krippner (Eds.), Varieties of anomalous experiences: Examining the scientific evidence (2nd ed., pp. 273–302). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lynn, S., & Rhue, J. (1986). The fantasy-prone person: Hypnosis, imagination, and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 404–408.Google Scholar
  10. Mayer, G. (2013). Spirituality and extraordinary experiences: Methodological remarks and some empirical findings. Journal of Empirical Theology, 26(2), 188–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McClenon, J. (1997). Shamanic healing, human evolution and the origin of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36(3), 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Merckelbach, H., Horselenberg, R., & Muris, P. (2001). The creative experiences questionnaire (CEQ): A brief self-report measure of fantasy proneness. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 987–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rock, A., & Baynes, P. (2005). Shamanic journeying imagery, constructivism, and the affect of bridge technique. Anthropology of Consciousness, 16(2), 50–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rock, A., & Baynes, P. (2007). What are the origins of shamanic journeying imagery? The modification of hypnoanalytic technique to address and enduring methodological problem. The Humanistic Psychologist, 35(4), 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rock, A., & Casey, P. (2005). Experimental study of ostensibly shamanic journeying imagery in naïve participants I: Antecedents. Anthropology of Consciousness, 16(2), 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rock, A., & Krippner, S. (2008a). Is a realistic interpretation of shamanic non-physical worlds logically incoherent? Transpersonal Psychology Review, 12(2), 23–31.Google Scholar
  17. Rock, A., & Krippner, S. (2008b). Proposed criteria for the necessary conditions for shamanic journeying inquiry. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 22(2), 215–226.Google Scholar
  18. Rock, A., & Krippner, S. (2008c). Some rudimentary problems pertaining to the construction of an ontology and epistemology of shamanic journeying imagery. International Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 27, 12–19.Google Scholar
  19. Rock, A., & Krippner, S. (2011). Demystifying shamans and their world: An interdisciplinary study. Charlottesville, VA: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  20. Sala, L. (2014). Ritual: A magical perspective. New Delhi, IN: Nirala.Google Scholar
  21. Winkelman, M. (2004). Shamanism as the original neurotheology. Zygon, 39(1), 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Winkelman, M. (2010). Shamanism: A biopsychosocial paradigm of consciousness and healing (2nd ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
  23. Winkelman, M., & Baker, J. (2010). Supernatural and natural: A biocultural approach to religion. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karel James Bouse
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Esoteric PsychologyLoudonUSA

Personalised recommendations