Requirements for a Future Economics

  • Fraser Murison Smith


Bringing the preceding chapters together, this chapter articulates requirements for a future economics in the service of a materially stable, prosperous society. The prevailing Cartesian mindset of the twentieth-century orthodoxy must give way to a participatory perspective. Seeing the purpose of the economy as self-preservation through the regeneration of natural capacity implies the existence of certain social norms in relation to nature and the economy’s place within it. Normative requirements for economics inform a collection of core concepts for a future economics, which in turn suggest ways economists would interact with other sciences, communicate their discoveries to policymakers and the public, and educate the next generation.


  1. An, L. 2012. Modeling Human Decisions in Coupled Human and Natural Systems: Review of Agent-Based Models. Ecological Modelling 229: 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balbi, S., and C. Giupponi. 2009. Reviewing Agent-Based Modelling of Socio-Ecosystems: A Methodology for the Analysis of Climate Change Adaptation and Sustainability. Working Papers, Department of Economics, Ca’Foscari University of Venice, No. 15,
  3. Berman, M. 1981. The Re-enchantment of the World. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Colander, D.C. 2010. Economics, 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Daly, H.E. 1991. Steady-State Economics, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Dodd, N. 2014. The Social Life of Money. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drengson, A. 1995. Shifting Paradigms: From Technocrat to Planetary Person. In The Deep Ecology Movement: An Introductory Anthology, ed. A. Drengson and Y. Inoue, 74–100. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Farmer, D., et al. 2015. A Third Wave in the Economics of Climate Change. Environmental & Resource Economics 62: 329–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Filatova, T., et al. 2013. Spatial Agent-Based Models for Socio-Ecological Systems: Challenges and Prospects. Environmental Modelling and Software 45: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frank, R.H. 1999. Luxury Fever: Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of Excess. New York: The Free Press, Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  11. Frank, R.H., T. Gilovich, and D. Regan. 1993. Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (2): 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galbraith, J.K. 1973. Economics and the Public Purpose. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  13. Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goodwin, N., et al. 2009. Microeconomics in Context, 2nd ed. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  15. Heisenberg, W. 1962. Physics and Philosophy. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  16. Hoekstra, A., M. Steinbuch, and G. Verbong. 2017. Creating Agent-Based Energy Transition Management Models That Can Uncover Profitable Pathways to Climate Change Mitigation. Complexity, Vol. 2017, Article ID 1967645, 23 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Kelly, M. 2012. Owning Our Future: The Emerging Ownership Revolution. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  18. Langer, S. 1957. Philosophy in a New Key, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Marglin, S. 2008. The Dismal Science: How Thinking Like an Economist Undermines Community. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Marwell, G., and R. Ames. 1981. Economists Free Ride, Does Anyone Else? Journal of Public Economics 15: 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mathews, F. 1995. Conservation and Self-Realization: A Deep-Ecology Perspective. In The Deep Ecology Movement: An Introductory Anthology, ed. A. Drengson and Y. Inoue, 124–135. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Maturana, H.R., and F.J. Varela. 1998. The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, Rev. ed. Boston and London: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  23. Murison Smith, F.D. 2020. A Planetary Economy. In prep.Google Scholar
  24. Naess, A. 2008. The Ecology of Wisdom: Writings by Arne Naess, ed. Alan Drengson and Bill Devall. Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint Press.Google Scholar
  25. Naess, A., and D. Rothenberg. 1989. Ecology, Community and Lifestyle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Orrell, D., and R. Chlupatý. 2016. The Evolution of Money. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Patt, A., and B. Siebenhüner. 2005. Agent-Based Modeling and Adaptation to Climate Change. Vierteljahrshefte Zur Wirtschaftsforschung 74 (2): 310–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ponting, C. 1992. A New Green History of the World. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  29. Raworth, K. 2017. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Schellenberg, S. 2018. The Unity of Perception: Content, Consciousness, Evidence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Simmel, G. 1900, 1907. The Philosophy of Money (Original and Revised Editions). 2004 Third Enlarged Edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Simon, H.A. 1991. Organizations and Markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (2): 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stiglitz, J.E. 2003. The Roaring Nineties. New York and London: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  34. Whitehead, A.N. 1938. Modes of Thought. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fraser Murison Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.San RafaelUSA

Personalised recommendations