Advertisement

Ethics and Professionalism in Planning Practice: An Experience from Dhaka

  • Shakil AktherEmail author
  • Ishrat IslamEmail author
Chapter
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Ethical and professional dimensions of planning practice deal with the art and science of urban planning, in its many aspects. Ethics in planning are the values, standards, and philosophies that planners live by. Ethical planning helps planners establish codes of professional behaviors, and collectively ethics which translated into institutional, government policies and programs. In Dhaka, planning practitioners struggle with three priorities, i.e. environmental protection, economic development and social equity in the context of a fast paced urbanization and limited resources. In this chapter, we explore how the ethical issues of planning were perceived by the professionals, academics, civil society, media, government and politicians during the preparation, monitoring and implementation of Detailed Area Plan (DAP) of Dhaka Metropolitan Area.

Keywords

Ethics Dhaka Metropolitan Area Planning practice 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all our colleagues from academic institutes, professional bodies and civil society organization who worked tirelessly with us during the time of movement against the proposed Draft DAP. We would also like to thank Dr. Afsana Haque who is maintaining the depository of all things related with DAP.

References

  1. Alam BM (2011) Are Anglo-American-Style normative planning theories applicable in South Asian cities? an exploratory study. Arab World Geographer/Le Géographe du monde Arab 14(1):72–93Google Scholar
  2. Ali T (2013) Death for Dhaka if DAP fails. The Daily Star, Dhaka, p 22Google Scholar
  3. Ali T, Alam H (2010) DAP now official. The Daily Star, Dhaka, p 20Google Scholar
  4. Ali T, Byron RK (2015) New 20 year DAP amid failure of the old one. The Daily Star, Dhaka, p 25Google Scholar
  5. Ameen MS (1998) Growth potentials of a pre-mature mega city: an event of grim portent. Journal of Civil Engineering 6(2):151–72Google Scholar
  6. American Planning Association (APA) (1992) Ethical Principles in Planning. Retrieved July 10 2017, from https://www.planning.org/ethics/ethicalprinciples.htm
  7. Anonymous (2013) Bangladesh Budget 2013–2014 and Implementation. Retrieved Nov 12, 2014, from http://gurumia.com/2013/06/09/bangladesh-budget-2013-2014-and-implementation/
  8. Anonymous (2014) RAJUK chairman Deny graft in plot distribution. The Independent. DhakaGoogle Scholar
  9. Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Instit Plann 35(4):216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bangladesh Institute of Planners (2008) Detail Area Plan (DAP) of Dhaka: shattering the vision of DMDP. The Daily Star, Dhaka, p 18Google Scholar
  11. Bhuiyan K (2014, March 2, 2014) 80pc Wetlands and Flood Flow Zones Filled Up. Retrieved 26 Jan 2015, from http://www.steinandpartners.com/eco/80pc-wetlands-and-flood-flow-zones-filled-up
  12. Byron RK, Ali T (2014) Amnesty to breed more black money: govt to gain little yet welcomes taka-legalising in real estate. The Daily Star, Dhaka, p 24Google Scholar
  13. Campbell H, Marshall R (1998) Acting on principle: dilemmas in planning practice. Plann Pract Res 13(2):117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook A, Sarkissian W (2000) Who cares? Australian planners and ethics. Local Government: Public Enterprise and Ethics. P. Bishop and N. Preston. Sydney, Federation Press: 112–137Google Scholar
  15. DDC (2007) Detailed Area Plan of Dhaka (Draft). Rajdhani Unnayan Kotripokkho (RAJUK), DhakaGoogle Scholar
  16. EPC (2007) Detailed Area Plan of Dhaka (Draft). Rajdhani Unnayan Kotripokkho (RAJUK), DhakaGoogle Scholar
  17. Filion P (1996) Metropolitan planning objectives and implementation constraints: planning in a Post-Fordist and Postmodern Age. Environ Plann A 28(9):1637–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedmann J (1987) Planning in the public domain: from knowledge to action. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Ganibangla Ltd DDC (2007) Detailed area plan of Dhaka (Draft). Rajdhani Unnayan Kotripokkho (RAJUK), DhakaGoogle Scholar
  20. Government of Bangladesh (1987) Town Improvement (Amendent) Act, Government of Bangladesh. Act 29/1987Google Scholar
  21. Government of Bangladesh (1997) Dhaka Metropolitan Development Plan (1995–2015), Government of Bangladesh. SRO 184/97Google Scholar
  22. Government of Bangladesh (2000) Waterbody Conservation Act, Government of Bangladesh. Act No 36/2000Google Scholar
  23. Government of Bangladesh (2006) The Public Procurement Act, Government of Bangladesh Act no 24/2006Google Scholar
  24. Government of Bangladesh (2009a) Local government (municipality) law (Local Government Paurashava) Act) Government of Bangladesh. Act No 58/2009Google Scholar
  25. Government of Bangladesh (2009b) Local Government (City Corporation) Ordinance Local Government (City Corporation) Ordinance, Government of Bangladesh. Act 60/2009Google Scholar
  26. Government of Bangladesh (2009c) Local Government (Union Council) Act (Local Government (Union Parishad) Act), Government of Bangladesh. Act no 61/2009Google Scholar
  27. Hammadi S (2008) Hotchpotch map on faulty plan. The New Age, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  28. Hillier J (1993) To boldly go where no planners have ever. Environ Plann D Soc Space 11(1):89–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Howe E, Kaufman J (1979) The ethics of contemporary American planners. J Am Plann Assoc 45(3):243–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kabir A, Parolin B (2010) Planning and Development of Dhaka—a Story of 400 years. In: 15th international planning history society conference, Sao Paulo, International Planning History SocietyGoogle Scholar
  31. Low N (1991) Planning. Political Foundations of Planning Thought London, Unwin Hyman, Politics and the StateGoogle Scholar
  32. Mahmud MA (2007) Corruption in plan permission process in RAJUK: a study of violations and proposals. Transparency International, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  33. Marcuse P (1976) Professional ethics and beyond: values in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 42(3): 264–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ministerial Committee for DAP Review (2014a) Minutes of Records of the Meeting Held on 4th June 2014. DhakaGoogle Scholar
  35. Ministerial Committee for DAP Review (2014b) Minutes of Records of the Meeting Held on 25th August 2014. DhakaGoogle Scholar
  36. Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development (2001) National Rural Development Policy, Government of BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  37. Minsitry of Land (2001) National Land Use Policy, Government of BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  38. Nedovic-Budic Z (2000) Geographic information science: implications for urban and regional planning. URISA J 12(2):81–93Google Scholar
  39. Perloff HS (1980) Planning the post industrial city. APA press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  40. Potter R (2012) Urbanisation and planning in the third world: spatial perceptions and public participation, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Priyo desk (2011) RAJUK Corruption Makes Dhaka an Unplanned City-TIB. Retrieved 10th Oct 2014, from http://news.priyo.com/law-and-order/2011/07/03/rajuk-corruption-makes-dhaka-u-30546.html
  42. Ratan RI (2010) Experts have created a radical change in the opinion of the DPA. (For whose interest DAP prepared by Expert has been drastically changed by Review Committee?). Daily Jugantor. Dhaka. 11:20Google Scholar
  43. Reade E (1987) British town and country planning. Oxford University Press, Milton KeynesGoogle Scholar
  44. SAMAN, HAN A Urban Research Institute, et al (2015) Dhaka Structure Plan 2016–35 (draft). DhakaGoogle Scholar
  45. Shelltech (Pvt) Ltd (2007) Detailed Area Plan of Dhaka (Draft). Dhaka, Rajdhani Unnayan Kotripokkho (RAJUK)Google Scholar
  46. Shelltech (Pvt) Ltd and Dial Consultants Ltd (2007) Detailed Area Plan of Dhaka (Draft). Dhaka, Rajdhani Unnayan Kotripokkho (RAJUK)Google Scholar
  47. Special Reporter (2009) Due to corruption, the implementation of RAJUK’s DAP project is not progressing(RAJUK’s DAP project implementation is stalled due to corruption). Top News (The Shirsho Khobor). 5:17–8Google Scholar
  48. Technical Working Group (2010) DAP Review. Technical Review Committee for DAP, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  49. Transparency International (1996) Corruption perception index 1996. Transparency International, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  50. Transparency International (2001) Corruption perception index 2001. Transparency International, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  51. Transparency International (2012) Corruption perception index 2012. Transparency International, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  52. Transparency International (2013) Corruption perception index 2013. Transparency International, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  53. Wachs M (1985) Ethics in Planning. Transaction PublishersGoogle Scholar
  54. Winter I, Brooke T (1993) Urban planning and the entrepreneurial state: the view from Victoria, Australia. Environ Plann C Government Policy 11(3):263–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urban and Regional PlanningBangladesh University of Engineering and TechnologyDhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations