Advertisement

Fertility

  • Ilse DelbaereEmail author
  • Jenny Stern
Chapter
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

The topic of planning or preparing for pregnancy is complex. Words such as ‘planning’ and ‘pregnancy intention’ have different meanings for different communities. The ability to ‘plan’ a pregnancy assumes that women have access to resourcespower over decisions about their reproductive health and the ability to control their own future and raise their children in a safe environment (Ross 2017). Planning for a pregnancy may be a Western middle-class concept that doesn’t fit different cultures or religious perspectives. This chapter recognizes these complexities and aims to describe people’s general motivations to have children and the extent to which people understand human reproduction and lifts up critical issues around fertility that can impact a couple’s ability to achieve pregnancy. The chapter highlights age as one of the most important determinants of female fertility and a leading contributor to the higher need of assisted reproduction within the population. Female and male conditions requiring medical assistance to conceive are also described. Assisted reproductive techniques have their limitations but are currently efficient and still evolving rapidly with some very evolutionary procedures to come. Understanding fertility is important for all young adults. Health-care providers have a responsibility for educating people about their fertility and providing unbiased information and reproductive care

Keywords

Fertility Fertility awareness Family planning Subfertility Reproduction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank professor Petra De Sutter (Ghent University, Belgium) for her advice on the medical topics.

References

  1. Agricola E, Gesualdo F, Pandolfi E, Gonfiantini MV, Carloni E, Mastroiacovo P, et al. Does googling for preconception care result in information consistent with international guidelines: a comparison of information found by Italian women of childbearing age and health professionals. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13(1):14.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Akande VA. Tubal disease: towards a classification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15(4):369–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alfaraj S, Aleraij S, Morad S, Alomar N, Al Rajih H, Alhussain H, et al. Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes toward parenthood among female health professions students in Saudi Arabia. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2019;13(3):34–9. [cited 2019 Jun 9]. https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.zuid.vives.ezproxy.kuleuven.be/pmc/articles/PMC6512144/pdf/IJHS-13-34.pdf Google Scholar
  4. Allaire AD, Cefalo RC. Preconceptional health care model. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;78:163–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Almeida-Santos T, Melo C, Macedo A, Moura-Ramos M. Are women and men well informed about fertility? Childbearing intentions, fertility knowledge and information-gathering sources in Portugal. Reprod Health. 2017;14:91.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Baird DT, Bajos N, Cleland J, Glasier A, La Vecchia C, Leridon H, et al. Why after 50 years of effective contraception do we still have unintended pregnancy? A European perspective. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(5):777–83. [cited 2019 Jun 7]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29659848 Google Scholar
  7. Barrett G, Smith SC, Wellings K. Conceptualisation, development, and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy. J Epidemiol Community Heal. 2004;58:426–33.Google Scholar
  8. Bodin M, Tydén T, Käll L, Larsson M. Can Reproductive Life Plan-based counseling increase men’s fertility awareness? Ups J Med Sci. 2018;123(4):255–63.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Boivin J. How does stress, depression and anxiety affect patients undergoing treatment? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019;31(3):195–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Boivin J, Pennings G. Parenthood should be regarded as a right. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90:784–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Bommaraju A, Malat J, Mooney JL. Reproductive life plan counseling and effective contraceptive use among urban women utilizing title X services. Women’s Heal Issues. 2015;25(3):209–15.Google Scholar
  12. Bos HM, Van Rooij FB. The influence of social and cultural factors on infertility and new reproductive technologies. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;28(2):65–8. [cited 2019 Aug 23]; https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ipob20 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Brahem S, Mehdi M, Elghezal H, Saad A. The effects of male aging on semen quality, sperm DNA fragmentation and chromosomal abnormalities in an infertile population. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:425–32.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Bretherick KL, Fairbrother N, Avila L, Harbord SH, Robinson WP. Fertility and aging: do reproductive-aged Canadian women know what they need to know? Fertil Steril. 2010;93(7):2162–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bunting L, Boivin J. Development and preliminary validation of the fertility status awareness tool: FertiSTAT. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(7):1722–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter C, Kupka MS, De Mouzon J, Erb K, Mocanu E, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod. 2017;32(10):1957–73.Google Scholar
  17. Callegari LS, Aiken AR, Dehlendorf C, Cason P, Borrero S. Addressing potential pitfalls of reproductive life planning with patient-centred counseling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(2):129–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chan CHY, Chan THY, Peterson BD, Lampic C, Tam MYJ. Intentions and attitudes towards parenthood and fertility awareness among Chinese university students in Hong Kong: a comparison with Western samples. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(2):364–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Channon MD, Harper S. Educational differentials in the realisation of fertility intentions: is sub-Saharan Africa different? PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219736. [cited 2019 Aug 23].  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219736.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Dain L, Auslander R, Dirnfeld M. The effect of paternal age on assisted reproduction outcome. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):1–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Daniluk JC, Koert E. Fertility awareness online: the efficacy of a fertility education website in increasing knowledge and changing fertility beliefs. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(2):353–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Daniluk JC, Koert E, Cheung A. Childless women’s knowledge of fertility and assisted human reproduction: identifying the gaps. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(2):420–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.046.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Davies M, Webber L, Overton C. Infertility. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  24. De Sutter P, Gerris J, Dhont M. A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(11):2891–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Delbaere I, Verstraelen H, Goetgeluk S, Martens G, De Backer G, Temmerman M. Pregnancy outcome in primiparae of advanced maternal age. Eur J Obs Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;135(1):41–6.Google Scholar
  26. Devlieger R, Martens E, Goemaes R, Cammu H. Perinatale activiteiten in Vlaanderen 2017. Studiecentrum voor Perinatale Edidemiologie (SPE). 2018.Google Scholar
  27. Drevin J, Kristiansson P, Stern J, Rosenblad A. Measuring pregnancy planning: a psychometric evaluation and comparison of two scales. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(11):2765–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Dunlop AL, Logue KM, Miranda MC, Narayan DA. Integrating reproductive planning with primary health care: an explanation among low-income, minority women and men. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2010;1(2):37–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Eurostat. Being young in Europe today. 2015. [cited 2018 Mar 6].Google Scholar
  30. Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Devroey P. Mild ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate launch is a realistic option for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(2):333–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Files JA, Frey KA, David PS, Hunt KS, Noble BN, Mayer AP. Developing a reproductive life plan. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011;56:468–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Finer LB, Zolna MR. Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(9):843–52. [cited 2019 Aug 26]. http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMsa1506575 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Fooladi E, Weller C, Salehi M, Rezaee Abhari F, Stern J. Using reproductive life plan-based information in a primary health care center increased Iranian women’s knowledge of fertility, but not their future fertility plan: a randomized, controlled trial. Midwifery. 2018;67:77–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gardiner PM, Hempstead MB, Ring L, Bickmore T, Yinusa-Nyahkoon L, Tran H, et al. Reaching women through health information technology: the Gabby preconception care system. Am J Health Promot. 2013;27:eS11–20.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Goossens J, Van Den Branden Y, Van der Sluys L, Delbaere I, Van Hecke A, Verhaeghe S, et al. The prevalence of unplanned pregnancy ending in birth, associated factors, and health outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(12):2821–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Goossens J, Verhaeghe S, Van Hecke A, Barrett G, Delbaere I, Beeckman D. Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in women with pregnancies ending in birth. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0194033.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Habbema JDF, Eijkemans MJC, Leridon H, te Velde ER. Realizing a desired family size: when should couples start? Hum Reprod. 2015;30(9):2215–21.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK, Rossen LM. Vital statistics rapid release births: provisional data for 2018. 2018. [cited 2019 Aug 26]. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/index.htm.
  39. Jack BW, Bickmore T, Hempstead MB, Yinusa-Nyahkoon L, Sadikova E, Suzanne M, et al. Reducing preconception risks among African American women with conversational agent technology. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015;28:441–51.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson K, Posner S, Biermann J, Cordero J, Atrash H, Parker C, et al. Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care—United States. A report of the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-6):1–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lampic C, Svanberg AS, Karlström P, Tydén T. Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(2):558–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Leridon H. Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(7):1548–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mackenzie SC, Wickins-Drazilova D, Wickins J. The ethics of fertility treatment for same-sex male couples: considerations for a modern fertility clinic. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;244:71–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.11.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Max R. Our world in data: fertility rate. 2017. https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate
  45. Mercier RJ, Garrett J, Thorp J, Siega-Riz AM. Pregnancy intention and postpartum depression: secondary data analysis from a prospective cohort. BJOG. 2013;120(9):1116–22.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Mills M, Rindfuss RR, McDonald P, te Velde E. Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(6):848–60.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Mittal P, Dandekar A, Hessler D. Use of a modified reproductive life plan to improve awareness of preconception health in women with chronic disease. Perm J. 2014;18(2):28–32.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Mogilevkina I, Stern J, Melnik D, Getsko E, Tydén T. Ukrainan medical students’ attitudes to parenthood and knowledge of fertility. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care. 2016;21(2):189–94.Google Scholar
  49. Moos M-K. Unintended pregnancies: a call for nursing action. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2003;28(1):24–30.31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Moos M-K, Dunlop AL, Jack BW, Nelson L, Coonrod DV, Long R, et al. Healthier women, healthier reproductive outcomes: recommendations for the routine care of all women of reproductive age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:S280–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Moreau C, Bohet A, Le Guen M, Regnier Loilier A, Bajos N. Unplanned or unwanted? A randomized study of national estimates of pregnancy intention. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1663–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Morse JE, Moos M-K. Reproductive life planning: raising the questions. Matern Child Health J. 2018;22:439–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Niederberger C, Pellicer A, Cohen J, Gardner DK, Palermo GD, O’Neill CL, et al. Forty years of IVF. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(2):185–324.e5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Nouri K, Huber D, Walch K, Promberger R, Buerkle B, Ott J, et al. Fertility awareness among medical and non-medical students: a case-control study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:94.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Olive DL. Endometriosis in clinical practice. London and New York: Taylor & Francis; 2005.Google Scholar
  56. Ombelet W. Is global access to infertility care realistic? The Walking Egg Project. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28(3):267–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.11.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Ombelet W, Goossens J. Global reproductive health—why do we persist in neglecting the undeniable problem of childlessness in resource-poor countries? Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2017;9(1):1–3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Peterson B, Gordon C, Boehm JK, Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. Initiating patient discussions about oocyte cryopreservation: attitudes of obstetrics and gynaecology resident physicians. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018;6:72–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Peterson BD, Pirritano M, Tucker L, Lampic C. Fertility awareness and parenting attitudes among American male and female undergraduate university students. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(5):1375–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Robbins CL, Gavin L, Carter MW, Moskosky SB. The link between reproductive life plan assessment and provision of preconception care at publicly funded health centres. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017;49(3):167–72.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Ross L. Reproductive justice: an introduction. Oakland, CA: University of California Press; 2017.Google Scholar
  62. Sanders L. Reproductive life plans. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2009;34:342–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Schmidt L, Sobotka T, Bentzen JG, Andersen A, ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(1):29–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C, Karlström PO, Tydén T. Attitudes toward parenthood and awareness of fertility among postgraduate students in Sweden. Gend Med. 2006;3(3):187–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sobotka T, Lutz W. Misleading policy messages derived from the period TFR: should we stop using it? Comp Popul Stud—Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft. 2010;35(3):637–64.Google Scholar
  66. Sørensen NO, Marcussen S, Grønbaek Backhausen M, Juhl M, Schmidt L, Tydén T, et al. Fertility awareness and attitudes towards parenthood among Danish university college students. Reprod Health. 2016;13:146. [cited 2019 Jun 9]. https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.zuid.vives.ezproxy.kuleuven.be/pmc/articles/PMC5154162/pdf/12978_2016_Article_258.pdf PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Stern J, Bodin M, Grandahl M, Segeblad B, Axen L, Larsson M, et al. Midwives’ adoption of the reproductive life plan in contraceptive counselling: a mixed methods study. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(5):1146–55.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Stern J, Larsson M, Kristiansson P, Tydén T. Introducing reproductive life plan-based information in contraceptive counselling: an RCT. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(9):2450–61.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Szűcs M, Bitó T, Csíkos C, Párducz Szöllősi A, Furau C, Blidaru I, et al. Knowledge and attitudes of female university students on menstrual cycle and contraception. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;37(2):210–4.Google Scholar
  70. Tydén T, Svanberg AS, Karlström P-O, Lihoff L, Lampic C. Female university students’ attitudes to future motherhood and their understanding about fertility. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2006;11(3):181–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. United Nations. The Millennium Development Goals Report. 2015. https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/2015_MDG_Report/pdf/MDG2015rev(July 1).pdf.
  72. Urrutia RP, Polis CB, Jensen ET, Greene ME, Kennedy E, Stanford JB. Effectiveness of fertility awareness-based methods for pregnancy prevention: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):591–604.Google Scholar
  73. Van Bavel J. Choice of study discipline and the postponement of motherhood in Europe: the impact of expected earnings, gender composition, and family attitudes. Demography. 2010;47:439–58. [cited 2019 Jun 7]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000018/pdf/dem-47-0439.pdf PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Virtala A, Vilska S, Huttunen T, Kunttu K. Childbearing, the desire to have children, and awareness about the impact of age on female fertility among Finnish university students. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011;16(2):108–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Waldenström U. Postponing parenthood to advanced age. Ups J Med Sci. 2016;121(4):235–43.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WL, Slaughter R, McGhee EM. The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(4):e40.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(1):e4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. WHO. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 2010.Google Scholar
  79. WHO. Reproductive health strategy to accelerate progress towards the attainment of international development goals and targets. 2014. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/68754/WHO_RHR_04.8.pdf;jsessionid=F1280361A7D9F858A79EC094FBCBC201?sequence=1
  80. Wojcieszek AM, Thompson R. Conceiving of change: a brief intervention increases young adults’ knowledge of fertility and the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(2):523–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Yamashiro C, Sasaki K, Yabuta Y, Kojima Y, Nakamura T, Okamoto I, et al. Generation of human oogonia from induced pluripotent stem cells in vitro. Science. 2018;362(6412):356–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Yu L, Peterson B, Inhorn M, Boehm J, Patrizio P. Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward fertility awareness and oocyte cryopreservation among obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians. Hum Reprod. 2016;32(1):403–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vives University of Applied SciencesKortrijkBelgium
  2. 2.Sophiahemmet UniversityStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Uppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations