Advertisement

Ethnographic Fieldwork: The Self as an Informant and an Observer

  • Harisur RahmanEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In general, reflexivity is a turning back on oneself, a process of self-reference which recognizes the centrality of the subjectivity of the researcher to the production and representation of ethnographic knowledge. As I have done this research in my own social and cultural setting, this research has been immensely influenced and shaped by my own experience, memory and understanding of film and media. My ethnographic self has been a valuable resource for my research.

References

  1. Ahmad, M. (2004). Madrassa education in Pakistan and Bangladesh. Preliminary draft, conference paper, presented at Religion and Security in South Asia: An International Workshop, 19–22 August 2002, Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, Honolulu, Hawaii. Retrieved from http://www.iiu.edu.pk/wp-content/uploads/downloads/ird/downloads/madrassa-education-in-pakistan-and-bangladesh.pdf.
  2. Ahmed, Z. (2000). When a Bangladeshi ‘native’ is not a Bangladeshi ‘native’. In P. Sillitoe (Ed.), Indigenous knowledge development in Bangladesh: Present and future (pp. 201–210). London, UK: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Bochner, A. P., & Ellis, C. (1992). Personal narrative as a social approach to interpersonal communication. Communication Theory, 2(2), 165–172.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00036.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Collins, P., & Gallinat, A. (Eds.). (2013). The ethnographic self as resource: Writing memory and experience into ethnography. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, C. A. (2008). Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Denzin, N. K. (Ed.). (1989). Interpretive biography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research, 36(4), 273–290.  https://doi.org/10.2307/23032294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ginsburg, F. D., Abu-Lughod, L., & Larkin, B. (2002). Media worlds: Anthropology on new terrain. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Imam, S. R. (2005). English as a global language and the question of nation‐building education in Bangladesh. Comparative Education, 41(4), 471–486.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060500317588.
  11. Madden, R. (2010). Being ethnographic: A guide to the theory and practice of ethnography. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Muir, S. (2011). Multisited ethnography. In D. Southerton (Ed.), Encyclopedia of consumer culture (Vol. 2, pp. 1014–1016). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412994248.n375.
  14. Pink, S. (2013). Doing visual ethnography (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Siddiqi, A. S. I. (2015, March 4). Madrasah. Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh. Retrieved from http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Madrasah.
  16. White, S. C. (2012). Beyond the paradox: Religion, family and modernity in contemporary Bangladesh. Modern Asian Studies, 46(5), 1429–1458.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X12000133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Filmography

  1. Bokul, T. H. (Director). (1989). Beder Meye Josna. [Motion Picture] Dhaka: Anadamela Cholochitra.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and SociologyNorth South UniversityDhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations