Advertisement

Terminal Configuration and Sensitivity Analysis of Tank Current Measurement for FRA Diagnostics of Three-Phase Transformer Winding Model

  • V. S. B. Chaitanya DuvvuryEmail author
  • Saurav Pramanik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 598)

Abstract

This paper presents an in-depth analysis of tank current measurement for fault detection in a three-phase transformer winding model. In the first part of analysis, a unique fault detection sensitivity of tank current is presented for a three-phase winding model followed by determining the best terminal configuration to improve the sensitivity further. As a consequence of fault in three-phase winding model, it is found that tank current measurement always exhibits new additional resonance peaks. This feature is very unique for tank current response compared to the features in conventional FRA measurements. Further, an attempt is also made to quantify the fault-detection sensitivity of tank current by defining two indices. One index (named as “S-index”) is defined by the number of new extra resonance peaks in tank current magnitude response as a consequence of fault. Another is the well-known “root mean square deviation” between the two responses before and after the fault. Higher the index values, more is the sensitivity for tank current to fault detection. Using these indices, this paper also determines that the fault detection sensitivity is more for tank current if the non-tested phase terminals are kept shorted and grounded. Simulation results and experimental measurements on a practical three-phase winding model demonstrate the facts too. For practical viability, authors would also like to extend the present work for actual transformers in near future.

Keywords

Frequency response Tank current Transformer windings Resonance peaks 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors thank SRIC, IIT Kharagpur for granting ‘ISIRD’ fund to build experimental laboratory setup.

References

  1. 1.
    Samimi, M.H., Tenbohlen, S., Akmal, A.A.S., Mohseni, H.: Effect of different connection schemes, terminating resistors and measurement impedances on the sensitivity of the FRA method. IEEE Trans. Power Delivery 32(4), 1713–1720 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jayasinghe, J.A.S.B., Wang, Z.d., Jarman, P.N., Darwin, A.W.: Winding movement in power transformers: a comparison of FRA measurement connection methods. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 13(6), 1342–1349 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Picher, P., Lapworth, J., Noonan, T., Christian, J.: Mechanical condition assessment of transformer windings using frequency response analysis, CIGRE WG A2.26, Technical Brochure 342 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tenbohlen, S., Jagers, J., Gebauer, J., Muller, P., Lapworth, J., Yukiyasu, S., Desai, B., McIntosh, A., Bastos, G., Bo, L.: Transformer reliability survey: interim report. Electra, 46–49 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pramanik, S.: Resonance behavior and sensitivity to detect mechanical change in transformer winding: shunt current versus neutral current. IEEE Trans. Power Delivery 30(5), 2276–2283 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li, C.X., Zhu, T.Y., Xia, Q., Yao, C.G., Zhao, Z.Y.: Influence of untested winding in FRA test for winding diagnosis. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 12(8), 1704–1711 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pramanik, S., Duvvury, V.S.B.C., Sahoo, S.: Tank current measurement of three-phase transformer: its resonance behavior and sensitivity to detect mechanical faults, available in early access. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. ( https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrd.2019.2914249)

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations