Advertisement

‘For the Little Ones, the Best’: Australian Early Childhood Service and Policy Histories

  • Elise HunkinEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Over time ideas about what is best for young children in Australia have changed significantly, but also not very much. The quotation in this chapter heading, ‘For the little ones, the best,’ was the motto of the Sydney Day Nursery teacher’s college in 1946 (Huntsman 2005, 7) and signals the central discussion of this chapter: what has been thought of as best for young children in Australia? The chapter critiques Australian early childhood service and policy histories since settlement to show that the Australian zeitgeist has always assumed young children should be in the care of their mothers. It is argued that this ‘mother-care paradigm’ framed the development of early childhood services and policy, including contemporary ideas about quality.

Keywords

Childcare history Preschool history Childhood Mother-care Early childhood policy Early childhood service development 

References

  1. Adamson, E., and M. Brennan. 2014. “Social Investment or Private Profit? Diverging Notions of ‘Investment’ in Early Childhood Education and Care.” International Journal of Early Childhood 46 (1): 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ailwood, J. 2004. “Genealogies of Governmentality: Producing and Managing Young Children and Their Education.” The Australian Educational Researcher 31 (3): 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aspland, T. 2006. “Changing Patterns of Teacher Education in Australia.” Education Research and Perspectives 133 (2): 140–163.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, S. J. 2003. “The Teacher’s Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackmore, J., and H. Lauder. 2005. “Researching Policy.” In Research Methods in the Social Sciences, edited by B. Somekh and C. Lewin, 97–104. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bowlby, J. 1944. “Fourty-four juvenile thieves: Their characters and home life.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 25 (19): 107–127.Google Scholar
  7. Bowlby, J. 1951. Maternal Care and Mental Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  8. Brennan, D. 1993. “Australia.” In International Handbook of Child Care Policies and Programs, edited by M. Cochran, 11–22. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brennan, D. 1998. The Politics of Australia Child Care: Philanthropy to Feminism and Beyond. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brennan, D. 2002. “Australia: Child Care and State-Centered Feminism in a Liberal Welfare Regime”. In Child Care Policy at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring, edited by S. Michel and R. Mahon, 95–112. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Brennan, D. 2010. “Federalism, Childcare and Multilevel Governance in Australia.” In Federalism, Feminism and Multilevel Governance, edited by M. Haussman, M. Sawer, and J. Vickers, 37–50. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  12. Brennan, D., B. Cass, S. Himmelweit, and M. Szebehely. 2012. “Marketisation of Care: Rationales and Consequences in Nordic and Liberal Care Regimes.” Journal of European Social Policy 22 (4): 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clyde, M. 2000. “The Development of Kindergarten in Australia at the Turn of the Twentieth Century: A Response to Social Pressures and Educational Influences.” In Kindergartens and Cultures: The Global Diffusion of an Idea, edited by R. Wollons, 87–112. New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dahlberg, G., P. Moss, and A. Pence. 2006. Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Languages of Evaluation, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Dalli, C., E. J. White, J. Rockel, I. Duhn, E. Buchanan, S. Davidson, S. Ganly, L. Kus, and B. Wang. 2011. Quality Early Childhood Education for Under-Two-Year-Olds: What Should It Look Like? A Literature Review. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  16. Dombrowski, K. 2002. “Kindergarten Teacher Training in England and the United States 1950–1918.” History of Education 31 (5): 475–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dyson, M. 2005. “Australian Teacher Education: Although Reviewed to the Eyeballs Is There Evidence of Significant Change and Where to Now?” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 30 (1): 37–54.Google Scholar
  18. Dyster, B., and D. Meredith. 2012. Australia in the Global Economy: Continuity and Change. Port Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fenech, M. 2011. “An Analysis of the Conceptualisation of ‘Quality’ in Early Childhood Education and Care Empirical Research: Promoting ‘Blind Spots’ as Foci for Future Research.” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 12 (2): 102–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fenna, A. 2013. “Political Ideologies.” In Government Politics in Australia, edited by A. Fenna, J. Robbins, and J. Summers, 112–136. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearsons.Google Scholar
  21. Friendly, M., and S. Prentice. 2012. “Provision, Policy and Politics in ECE and Care.” In Recent Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Care in Canada, edited by N. Howe and L. Prochner, 50–80. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  22. Goldfarb, W. 1943. “The Effects of Early Institutional Care on Adolescent Personality.” Journal of Experimental Education 12: 106–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldfarb, W. 1945. “Psychological Privation in Infancy and Subsequent Adjustment.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 15: 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldfarb, W. 1947. “Variations in Adolescence Adjustment of Institutionally Reared Children.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 17: 449–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harms, T., and R. Clifford. 1980. Early Childhood Environmental Rating Scale. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  26. Harms, T., D. Cryer, and R. Clifford. 1990. Infant/Toddler Environment Rating Scale. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hunkin, E. 2018. “If Not Quality, Then What? The Discursive Risks in Early Childhood Quality Reform.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1453780.Google Scholar
  28. Huntsman, L. 2005. “For the Little Ones, the Best: SDN Children’s Services 1905–2005.” https://www.sdn.org.au/media/1890/for-the-little-ones-the-best-sdn-childrens-services-1905-2005.pdf.
  29. Hyams, B. 1979. Teacher Preparation in Australia: A History of Its Development from 1850 to 1950. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  30. Kilderry, A. 2015. “The Intensification of Performativity in Early Childhood Education.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 47 (5): 633–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Logan, H., F. Press, and J. Sumsion. 2012. “The Quality Imperative: Tracing the Rise of ‘Quality’ in Australian Early Childhood Education and Care Policy.” Australia Journal of Early Childhood 37 (3): 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Logan, H., J. Sumsion, and F. Press. 2013. “The Child Care Act 1972: A Critical Juncture in Australian ECEC and the Emergence of ‘Quality’.” Australasian Journal of Early Childhood 38 (4): 84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mahon, R. 2002. “Gender and Welfare State Restructuring: Through the Lens of Child Care.” In Child Care Policy at the Crossroad: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring, edited by S. Michel and R. Mahon, 1–27. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Mahon, R. 2010. “After Neo-Liberalism? The OECD, the World Bank and the Child.” Global Social Policy 10 (2): 172–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marginson, S. 1997. “Competition and Contestability in Australian Higher Education.” The Australian Universities Review 1: 5–14.Google Scholar
  36. McNutt, K., and L. Pal. 2011. “‘Modernizing Government’: Mapping Global Public Policy Networks.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 24 (3): 439–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mellor, E. 1990. Stepping Stones: The Development of Early Childhood Services in Australia. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  38. Morgan, K. 2002. “Does Anyone Have a ‘Libre Choix’? Subversive Liberalism and the Politics of French Child Care Policy.” In Child Car Policy at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring, edited by S. Michel and R. Mahon, 143–167. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Moss, P. 2009. There Are Alternatives! Markets and Democratic Experimentalism in Early Childhood Education and Care. Working Paper No. 53, Bernard van Leer Foundation and Bertelsmann Stiftung, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  40. National Childcare Accreditation Council (NCAC). 2001. Putting Children First: Quality Improvement and Accreditation System. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  41. Newberry, S., and D. Brennan. 2013. “The Marketisation of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) in Australia: A Structured Response.” Financial Accountability & Management 29 (3): 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Osgood, J. 2009. “Childcare Workforce Reform in England and ‘the Early Years Professional’: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Education Policy 24 (6): 733–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pence, A. 1989. “In the Shadow of Mother-Care: Contexts for an Understanding of Child Day Care in North America.” Canadian Psychology 30 (2): 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pence, A., and V. Pacini-Ketchabaw. 2008. “Discourses on Quality Care: The Investigating ‘Quality’ Project and the Canadian Experience.” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 9 (3): 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Penn, H. 2011. Quality in Early Childhood Services: An International Perspective. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Pianta, R., K. La Paro, and B. Hamre. 2008. Classroom Assessment Scoring System Manual: Pre-K. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  47. Press, F., and A. Hayes. 2000. OECD Thematic Review of Early Childhood Education and Care Policy: Australian Background Report. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  48. Rigg, J. 1972. “The Control of Women Workers.” National Review (October 14–20): 1524.Google Scholar
  49. Rizvi, F., and B. Lingard. 2010. Globalizing Education Policy. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Rose, E. 1999. A Mother’s Job: The History of Day Care 1890–1960. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rowe, K., J. Tainton, and D. Taylor. 2006. Key Feature of the Quality Improvement Accreditation System (QIAS) Administered by the National Childcare Accreditation Council (Australia). Surrey Hills, NSW: National Childcare Accreditation Council.Google Scholar
  52. Spearitt, P. 1979. “Child Care and Kindergartens in Australia 1980–1975.” In Early Childhood Education and Care in Australia, edited by P. Langford and P. Sebastian, 10–38. Sydney: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Group.Google Scholar
  53. Stonehouse, A. 1994. Not Just Nice Ladies. Castle Hill, NSW: Pandemelon Press.Google Scholar
  54. Strachan, G. 2010. “Still Working for the Man? Women’s Employment Experiences in Australia Since 1950.” Australian Journal of Social Issues 45 (1): 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sumsion, J. 2006. “The Corporatization of Australian Childcare: Towards an Ethical Audit and Research Agenda.” Journal of Early Childhood Research 4 (2): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sylva, K., I. Siraj-Batchford, and B. Taggart. 2006. Assessing Quality in the Early Years: Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Extension (ECERS-E), Four Curricular Subscales. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  57. Wannan, L. 2007. “Getting the Basics Right—Goals That Would Deliver a Good National Children’s Services System.” In Kids Count: Better Early Childhood Education and Care in Australia, edited by E. Hill, B. Pocock, and A. Elliot, 112–133. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Whitehead, K. 2008. “The Construction of Early Childhood Teachers’ Professional Identities, Then and Now”. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood 33 (3): 34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Whitehead, K. 2010. “A Decided Disadvantage for the Kindergarten Students to Mix with the State Teachers.” Paedagogica Historica 46 (1–2): 85–97.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230903528470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RMIT BundooraRoyal Melbourne Institute of TechnologyBundooraAustralia

Personalised recommendations