The Possibilities for Cyber Management Based on Cyber-Physical Systems in the Context of the Formation of a New Model of Development

  • Nikita A. Lebedev
  • Svetlana V. Zubkova
  • Nataliya A. Stanik
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)


Purpose: The purpose of the chapter is to examine the possibilities for cyber management based on cyber-physical systems in the context of the formation of a new model of development.

Design/methodology/approach: The research is performed with the help of regression analysis. The authors determine the regression dependence of the indicators for the competitiveness of the public (first pillar: Political and regulatory environment) and corporate (second pillar: Business and innovation environment) management of the indicators for the usage of new information and communication technologies in business (seventh pillar: Business usage), government (eighth pillar: Government usage), and the economy as a whole (ninth pillar: Economic impacts). The work is based on data and empirical materials in The Global Information Technology Report 2016, prepared by the World Economic Forum. The research objects are 20 countries, comprising the top 10 (1–10, developed countries) and the second (31–40, developing countries) in the World Digital Competitiveness Ranking for 2018, compiled by the IMD (63 countries in total are rated).

Findings: It is substantiated that the possibilities for cyber management based on cyber-physical systems in the context of the formation of a new model of development are substantial. The key directions for automatized state management are monitoring and control, statistical accounting, determining violations of the law, information and consultation support, and provision of state services. The key directions for automatized corporate management are economic accounting and reporting, production management, personnel management, and marketing management.

Originality/value: The developed structural and logical scheme of cyber management based on cyber-physical systems shows that such systems could be created at both the micro- and macro-levels using end-to-end (currently actively being developed) digital technologies of Industry 4.0: Internet of Things, AI, and Ubiquitous Computing. This could help to provide the expected advantages and support the announced principles of a new model of development: transparency, accessibility, and full openness of state management, as well as the effectiveness, flexibility, and integration of corporate management.


Cyber-physical systems Cyber management Cyber economy Industry 4.0 New model of development Internet of things Ubiquitous computing AI Automatization 

JEL Code

G34 G38 M11 M12 M15 O16 O31 O32 O33 O38 


  1. Bogoviz AV (2019) Industry 4.0 as a new vector of growth and development of knowledge economy. Stud Syst Decis Control 169:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Delicato FC, Zhou X, Wang KI-K, Guo S (2019) Special issue: advances and trends on cognitive cyber-physical systems. Ad Hoc Netw 88:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. IMD (2019) World digital competitiveness ranking 2018. Accessed 15 March 2019
  4. Leng J, Zhang H, Yan D et al (2019) Digital twin-driven manufacturing cyber-physical system for parallel controlling of smart workshop. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10(3):1155–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Li XX, He FZ, Li WD (2019) A cloud-terminal-based cyber-physical system architecture for energy efficient machining process optimization. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10(3):1049–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nikolakis N, Maratos V, Makris S (2019) A cyber physical system (CPS) approach for safe human-robot collaboration in a shared workplace. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 56:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Popkova EG (2019) Preconditions of formation and development of industry 4.0 in the conditions of knowledge economy. Stud Syst Decis Control 169:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Popkova EG, Sergi BS (2019) Will industry 4.0 and other innovations impact Russia’s development? Exploring the future of Russia’s economy and markets. Emerald, Bingley, pp 34–42Google Scholar
  9. Popkova EG, Ragulina YV, Bogoviz AV (2019) Fundamental differences of transition to Industry 4.0 from previous industrial revolutions. Stud Syst Decis Control 169:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Skowroński R (2019) The open blockchain-aided multi-agent symbiotic cyber-physical systems. Futur Gener Comput Syst 94:430–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikita A. Lebedev
    • 1
  • Svetlana V. Zubkova
    • 2
  • Nataliya A. Stanik
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences MoscowMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Financial University under the Government of the Russian FederationMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations