Advertisement

The Police Role in Delinquency Prevention and Control

  • Peter C. Kratcoski
  • Lucille Dunn Kratcoski
  • Peter Christopher Kratcoski
Chapter

Abstract

Police work with children involves the investigation of complaints initiated by residents of the community or of deviant behavior observed by the officers. Although officers on routine patrol are the most likely to have initial contacts with juvenile offenders, most departments have established juvenile bureaus in which officers with special training handle the complaints and investigations of cases involving juveniles. The decision to take action in police-juvenile encounters is based on the seriousness of the offense; the age, appearance; and attitude; the area in which the alleged offense occurs, and information the police have on the suspected offenders.

Keywords

Interrogation Custody Arrest Emergency protective custody Delinquent offender Status offender Juvenile diversion bureau Youth gang unit Probable cause 

References

  1. Bazemore, G., & Senjo, S. (1997). Police encounters with juveniles revisited: An exploratory study of styles and themes in community policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies And Management, 20(1), 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black, D., & Reiss, A. (1976). Police control of juveniles. In R. Moore Jr. & R. Barrows (Eds.), Readings in criminal justice (pp. 417–429). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  3. Bridges, G., Conley, D., Beretta, G., & Engen, R. (1993). Racial disproportionality in the juvenile justice system. Report to the African-American Affairs and management Services Division/Department of Social and Health Services. Olympia ,WA: State of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  4. Curry, G., & Decker, S. (1998). Confronting gangs. Los Angeles, CA: Roxberry Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  5. Gallegos v. Colorado. (1962). 370, U.S. 596, 68, Cr. 1209.Google Scholar
  6. Gray, R., Green, R., Bryant, J., Rance, J., & MacLean, S. (2019). Now vulnerable young people describe their interactions with police: Building pathways to drug diversion and treatment in Sydney and Melbourne, Australia. Police Practice and Research, 20(l), 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haley v. Ohio. (1948). 332 U.S. 596, 68 S, Cr.302.Google Scholar
  8. Hartstone, E., & Richetti, D. (1995). An assessment of minority overrepresentation in Connecticut’s juvenile justice system; Office of Policy and Management, Policy and Development Division. Hartford, CT: Spectrum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. In re Gault. (1967). 397, U.S. 1.Google Scholar
  10. J.D.B. v. North Carolina. (2011).Google Scholar
  11. Kempf-Leonard, K., Decker, S., & Bing, R. (1990). An analysis of apparent disparities in handling black youth within Missouri’s juvenile justice system. St. Louis, MO: University of Missouri-Saint Louis.Google Scholar
  12. Kratcoski, P. (1994). Evaluation of Cleveland Police mini-station program. Final research report for the Governor’s Office of criminal Justice services, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  13. Kratcoski, P. (2004). Al Hollis is arrested for speeding (personal notes).Google Scholar
  14. Kratcoski, P. (2012). Juvenile justice administration. Boca Raton, FL: CRC/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  15. Lawrence, R., & Hemmens, C. (2008). Juvenile justice: A text/reader. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Legislative Bridge for Drafting Family & Juvenile Court Act. (1968). Legislative guide for drafting family and juvenile court acts section 15Google Scholar
  17. Lundman, R., Sykes, R., & Clark, J. (1978). Police control of juveniles: A replication. In H. Rubin (Ed.), Juvenile justice: A book of readings. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Miranda v. Arizona. (1966). 384 US. 436,448.Google Scholar
  19. National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (1980). Standards for the administration of juvenile justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  20. National Conference of Commissions on Uniform State Laws. (1968). Section 13.Google Scholar
  21. National Gang Center. (2019). National youth gang survey analysis, pp. 1–7. Retrieved July 7, 2019, from https://nationalgangcenter.gov/Survey-Ahalysis/Measuringthe-Extent-of-Gang-Problems#estimatednumbergangs.
  22. National Institute of Justice. (1994). Solicitation for an evaluation of GREAT—Gang Resistance Education and Training. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  23. Piliavin, I., & Briar, S. (1976). Police encounters with juveniles. In W. Sanders & H. Daudistel (Eds.), The criminal justice process. Beverly Hills, CA: Glencoe.Google Scholar
  24. Sickmund, M., & Puzzanchera, C. (2014). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2014 national report. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.Google Scholar
  25. Simmons v. U.S. (1968). 390 U.S.377.Google Scholar
  26. Stoval v. Denno. (1967). 388 U.S.293,302.Google Scholar
  27. Street Gangs. (1995). Street gangs: The law enforcement guide to today’s urban violence. Boulder, CO: Paladin Press.Google Scholar
  28. Task Force on Juvenile Justice. (1977). Delinquency prevention and control. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  29. Thurman, Q., Giaconazzi, A., & Bogen, P. (1993). Research note: Cops, kids and community policing—An assessment of a community policing demonstration project. Crime and Delinquency, 39(4), 554–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wade v. U.S. (1967). U.S.218.Google Scholar
  31. Wilson, J. (2000). National youth gang survey: Summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  32. Yarborough v. Alvarado. (2004). 541 U.S. 652.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter C. Kratcoski
    • 1
  • Lucille Dunn Kratcoski
    • 2
  • Peter Christopher Kratcoski
    • 3
  1. 1.Sociology/Justice StudiesKent State UniversityTallmadgeUSA
  2. 2.TallmadgeUSA
  3. 3.Williams, Welser & Kratcoski LLCKentUSA

Personalised recommendations