Advertisement

Using Network Reification for Adaptive Networks: Discussion

  • Jan TreurEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 251)

Abstract

In this final chapter, the most important or most remarkable themes recurring at different places in this book are briefly summarized and reviewed. Subsequently the following themes are addressed: (1) How network reification can be used to model adaptive networks. (2) The formats in which conceptual representations of reified networks are expressed graphically using 3D pictures and role matrices. (3) The universal combination function, and the universal difference and differential equation as the basis for the numerical representation and implementation of reified networks. (4) Analysis of how emerging reified network behaviour relates to the reified network’s structure. (5) The Network-Oriented design process based on reified networks. (6) The relation to longstanding themes in AI and beyond.

References

  1. Ashby, W.R.: Design for a Brain. Chapman and Hall, London (second extended edition). First edition, 1952 (1960)Google Scholar
  2. Banks, D.L., Carley, K.M.: Models for network evolution. J. Math. Sociol. 21, 173–196 (1996)Google Scholar
  3. Bott, E.: Family and Social Network: Roles, Norms and External Relationships in Ordinary Urban Families London, Tavistock Publications (1957)Google Scholar
  4. Bowen, K.A., Kowalski, R.: Amalgamating language and meta-language in logic programming. In: Clark, K., Tarnlund, S. (eds.) Logic Programming, pp. 153–172. Academic Press, New York (1982)Google Scholar
  5. Demers, F.N., Malenfant, J.: Reflection in logic, functional and object-oriented programming: a short comparative study. In: IJCAI’95 Workshop on Reflection and Meta-Level Architecture and their Application in AI, pp. 29–38 (1995)Google Scholar
  6. Fessler, D.M.T., Clark, J.A., Clint, E.K.: Evolutionary psychology and evolutionary anthropology. In: Buss, D.M. (ed.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, pp. 1029–1046. Wiley and Sons (2015)Google Scholar
  7. Fessler, D.M.T., Eng, S.J., Navarrete, C.D.: Elevated disgust sensitivity in the first trimester of pregnancy: evidence supporting the compensatory prophylaxis hypothesis. Evol. Hum. Behav. 26(4), 344–351 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fleischman, D.S., Fessler, D.M.T.: Progesterone’s effects on the psychology of disease avoidance: support for the compensatory behavioral prophylaxis hypothesis. Horm. Behav. 59(2), 271–275 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hebb, D.O.: The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory (1949)Google Scholar
  10. Hofstadter, D.R.: Gödel, Escher, Bach. Basic Books, New York (1979)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Hofstadter, D.R.: I Am a Strange Loop. Basic Books, New York (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim, J.: Philosophy of Mind. Westview Press (1996)Google Scholar
  13. Kim, J.: Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation, MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  14. Kuipers, B.J.: Commonsense reasoning about causality: Deriving behavior from structure, vol. 24. pp. 169–203, Artificial Intelligence (1984)Google Scholar
  15. Kuipers, B.J., Kassirer, J.P.: How to discover a knowledge representation for causal reasoning by studying an expert physician. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI’83, pp. 49–56. William Kaufman, Los Altos, CA (1983)Google Scholar
  16. Luce, R.D., Perry, A.: A method of matrix analysis of group structure. Psychometrika 14, 95 (1949)Google Scholar
  17. Leavitt, H.: Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 46, 38 (1951)Google Scholar
  18. Moreno, J.L.: Who Shall Survive? Nervous and Mental Disease. Publishing Company, Washington, DC (1934)Google Scholar
  19. Pearl, J.: Causality. Cambridge University Press (2000)Google Scholar
  20. Port, R.F., van Gelder, T.: Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1995)Google Scholar
  21. Sterling, L., Shapiro, E.: The Art of Prolog. MIT Press (Ch 17, pp. 319–356) (1996)Google Scholar
  22. Sterling, L., Beer, R.: Metainterpreters for expert system construction. J. Log. Program. 6, 163–178 (1989)Google Scholar
  23. Treur, J.: Network-Oriented Modeling: Addressing Complexity of Cognitive, Affective and Social Interactions. Springer Publishers (2016)Google Scholar
  24. Treur, J.: On the applicability of network-oriented modeling based on temporal-causal networks: why network models do not just model networks. J. Inf. Telecommun. 1(1), 23–40 (2017)Google Scholar
  25. Weyhrauch, R.W.: Prolegomena to a theory of mechanized formal reasoning. Artif. Intell. 13, 133–170 (1980)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social AI Group, Department of Computer ScienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations