Advertisement

Chapter 15: Drug Product Formulation Development and Formulation Robustness Criteria for a mAb in a Pre-filled Syringe

  • Alavattam SreedharaEmail author
  • Gregory Downing
  • Karen Rutherford
Chapter
  • 78 Downloads
Part of the AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series book series (AAPS, volume 35)

Abstract

A majority of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are formulated for intravenous (IV) administration. Recently however several subcutaneous (SC) products have been approved that are ready to use in a physician’s office, clinic, or at home using either a pre-filled syringe (PFS), an auto-injector (AI), or patch pumps. AIs have shown to be more convenient for patients and ensure better compliance, especially while treating chronic conditions such as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or asthma. SC products have certain limitations during pharmaceutical development including volume per injection (usually 1–2 mL), short injection times, bioavailability (typically 60–70% of IV dosing), and number of injections per dose cycle (preferably one or two injections). This makes development of high-concentration formulation mandatory if SC administration by PFS is called for in the target product profile (TPP). High-concentration mAb formulation development needs to take several aspects into account, including viscosity due to high concentrations, syringeability, and potential interactions between formulation and device components. Formulation scientists typically use a multivariate study with statistical analysis to comprehend any interactions between the formulation parameters, their ranges, and if there is any impact on protein product quality over time and temperature. This chapter focuses on formulation development of mAb drug products for subcutaneous delivery using a quality by design (QbD) approach. We present a two-pronged approach to (1) design and execute a pre-robustness study to identify worst-case formulations and (2) robustness studies on worst-case formulations to support product development in a PFS. We believe this approach will simplify product development while assuring that formulation robustness can be achieved using a QbD approach.

Keywords

Monoclonal antibodies Pre-filled syringes Quality by design Pre-robustness Robustness Worst-case formulations Formulation robustness Drug product Drug product processing 

References

  1. 1.
    Sreedhara A, Wong RL, Lentz YK, Schoenhammer K, Stark C. Application of QbD principles to late-stage formulation development for biological liquid products. In: Quality by design for biopharmaceutical drug product development, vol. 18; 2015. p. 115–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shire SJ, Shahrokh Z, Liu J. Challenges in the development of high protein concentration formulations. J Pharm Sci. 2004;93(6):1390–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Whitaker N, Xiong J, Pace SE, Kumar V, Middaugh CR, Joshi SB, Volkin DB. A formulation development approach to identify and select stable ultra-high-concentration monoclonal antibody formulations with reduced viscosities. J Pharm Sci. 2017;106(11):3230–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu J, Nguyen MD, Andya JD, Shire SJ. Reversible self-association increases the viscosity of a concentrated monoclonal antibody in aqueous solution. J Pharm Sci. 2005;94(9):1928–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Inoue N, Takai E, Arakawa T, Shiraki K. Specific decrease in solution viscosity of antibodies by arginine for therapeutic formulations. Mol Pharm. 2014;11(6):1889–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Connolly BD, Petry C, Yadav S, Demeule B, Ciaccio N, Moore JM, Shire SJ, Gokarn YR. Weak interactions govern the viscosity of concentrated antibody solutions: high-throughput analysis using the diffusion interaction parameter. Biophys J. 2012;103(1):69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chaudhri A, Zarraga IE, Kamerzell TJ, Brandt JP, Patapoff TW, Shire SJ, Voth GA. Coarse-grained modeling of the self-association of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. J Phys Chem B. 2012;116(28):8045–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chaudhri A, Zarraga IE, Yadav S, Patapoff TW, Shire SJ, Voth GA. The role of amino acid sequence in the self-association of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: insights from coarse-grained modeling. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117(5):1269–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu W, Swift R, Torraca G, Nashed-Samuel Y, Wen ZQ, Jiang Y, Vance A, Mire-Sluis A, Freund E, Davis J, Narhi L. Root cause analysis of tungsten-induced protein aggregation in pre-filled syringes. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2010;64(1):11–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jiang Y, Nashed-Samuel Y, Li C, Liu W, Pollastrini J, Mallard D, Wen ZQ, Fujimori K, Pallitto M, Donahue L, Chu G, Torraca G, Vance A, Mire-Sluis T, Freund E, Davis J, Narhi L. Tungsten-induced protein aggregation: solution behavior. J Pharm Sci. 2009;98(12):4695–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chan E, Hubbard A, Sane S, Maa YF. Syringe siliconization process investigation and optimization. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2012;66(2):136–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gerhardt A, Nguyen BH, Lewus R, Carpenter JF, Randolph TW. Effect of the siliconization method on particle generation in a monoclonal antibody formulation in pre-filled syringes. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104(5):1601–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sreedhara A, Yin J, Joyce M, Lau K, Wecksler AT, Deperalta G, Yi L, John Wang Y, Kabakoff B, Kishore RS. Effect of ambient light on IgG1 monoclonal antibodies during drug product processing and development. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2016;100:38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hui A, Lam XM, Kuehl C, Grauschopf U, Wang YJ. Kinetic modeling of methionine oxidation in monoclonal antibodies from hydrogen peroxide spiking studies. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2015;69(4):511–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grewal P, Mallaney M, Lau K, Sreedhara A. Screening methods to identify indole derivatives that protect against reactive oxygen species induced tryptophan oxidation in proteins. Mol Pharm. 2014;11(4):1259–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hubbard A, Roedl T, Hui A, Knueppel S, Eppler K, Lehnert S, Maa YF. Vapor phase hydrogen peroxide decontamination or sanitization of an isolator for aseptic filling of monoclonal antibody drug product-hydrogen peroxide uptake and impact on protein quality. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2018;72(4):348–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alavattam Sreedhara
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gregory Downing
    • 1
  • Karen Rutherford
    • 1
  1. 1.Late Stage Pharmaceutical Development, Genentech, Inc.South San FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations