This chapter introduces the core question that is at the centre of this book—originally posed by Roger Säljö in 1999—that is, whether the new digital technologies are transforming language learning and teaching. A follow-up question asks what this would mean for learners, teachers and researchers. The chapter then sets out a particular understanding of language as a tool for communication and meaning-making and introduces the theoretical approach taken in the book, an approach that brings together complex systems theory with sociocultural theory and the theory of multimodality. It ends with an overview of Chapters 2– 7.
KeywordsDigital technologies Transformation Meaning-making Complex systems theory
- Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Coughlan, S. (2015, May 13). UK ‘biggest online university course’. BBC. Available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-32721056.
- Dahlstrom, E. with D. Brooks, S. Grajek, & J. Reeves. (2015). ECAR study of students and information technology, 2015 (Research report). Louisville, CO: ECAR. Available at https://library.educause.edu/resources/2015/8/~/media/24ddc1aa35a5490389baf28b6ddb3693.ashx.
- Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (2008). Globalisation and pedagogy: Space, place and identity. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (Eds.). (2009). Language as a complex adaptive system (Special issue). Language Learning, 59(Suppl. 1).Google Scholar
- Galanek, J. D., Gierdowksi, D. C, & Brook, D. C. (2018). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology. Available at https://www.educause.edu/ecar/research-publications/ecar-study-of-undergraduate-students-and-information-technology/2018/introduction-and-key-findings.
- Hampel, R. (2014). Making meaning online: Computer-mediated communication for language learning. In A. Peti-Stantić & M.-M. Stanojević (Eds.), Language as Information: Proceedings from the CALS Conference 2012 (pp. 89–106). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (Eds.). (2012). Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
- Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Jewitt, C. (2014). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the media age. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
- Lam, W. S. E., & Kramsch, C. (2003). The ecology of an SLA community in a computer-mediated environment. In J. Leather & J. Van Dam (Eds.), Ecology of language acquisition (pp. 141–158). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
- Larsen-Freeman, D. (2016). Classroom-oriented research from a complex systems perspective. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 377–393. Available at http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-54c09aeb-a66a-4cc9-844c-c5d8ae381623/c/SSLLT_6_3__377-393_Larsen-Freeman.pdf. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.3.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- May, K. E., & Elder, A. D. (2018). Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(13). Available at https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-018-0096-z. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0096-z.
- Mitchell, M., & Newman, M. (2002). Complex systems theory and evolution. In M. Pagel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~mm/EncycOfEvolution.pdf.
- Prigogine, I. (1996). The end of certainty: Time, chaos and the new laws of nature. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools: A sociocultural perspective on the human–technology link. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analysing productive interaction (pp. 144–161). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Spence, P., & Brandao, R. (2019). Survey of attitudes towards digital culture & technology in the modern languages. London, UK: Language Acts and Worldmaking.Google Scholar
- Thorne, S. L. (2016). Engineering conditions of possibility in technology-enhanced language learning. In C. Caws & M.-J. Hamel (Eds.), Language-learner computer interactions: Theory, methodology and CALL applications (pp. 241–246). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
- Verspoor, M. H., Lowie, W. M., & de Bot, K. (2009). Input and second language development from a dynamic perspective. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 62–80). Bristol, Buffalo, and Toronto: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. London and Cambridge, MA: Harvester Wheatsheaf and Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar