Advertisement

Effect of Shape of Cutting Edge on Face Milled Surface Topography

  • Csaba FelhőEmail author
  • Antal Nagy
  • Janos Kundrák
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

For improved machining efficiency, in addition to the increase in material removal performance, the operating conditions and the assurance of the roughness values specified by the manufacturers for the surface of the component must be considered. In this article the topography of surfaces created with the same cutting data is analyzed with different geometry inserts. It is shown how the 2D and 3D roughness parameters can be estimated in different cases. Then the theoretical (estimated) and actual values from cutting operations are inspected, and the differences between them are discussed. Finally, the different versions are ranked based on the smallest achievable roughness values, and it was found, that the round insert gives the lowest roughness values.

Keywords

Face milling Surface roughness Theoretical roughness Insert geometry 3D roughness 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors greatly appreciate the support of the National Research, Development and Innovation Office – NKFIH (No. of Agreement: K 116876). The described study was carried out as part of the EFOP-3.6.1-16-00011 “Younger and Renewing University – Innovative Knowledge City – institutional development of the University of Miskolc aiming at intelligent specialization” project implemented in the framework of the program Szechenyi 2020. Both grants are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    van Luttervelt, C.A., Childs, T.H.C., Jawahir, I.S., Klocke, F., Venuvinod, P.K., Altintas, Y., Armarego, E., Dornfeld, D., Grabec, I., Leopold, J., Lindstrom, B., Lucca, D., Obikawa, T., Shirakashi, Sato, H.: Present situation and future trends in modelling of machining operations progress report of the CIRP working group ‘modelling of machining operations’. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 47(2), 587–626 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Munoz-Escalona, P., Maropoulos, P.G.: A geometrical model for surface roughness prediction when face milling Al 7075-T7351 with square insert tools. J. Manuf. Syst. 36, 216–223 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu, X., Yin, X.: Surface roughness analysis and parameter optimization of mold steel milling. Procedia CIRP 71, 317–321 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karkalos, N.E., Galanis, N.I., Markopoulos, A.P.: Surface roughness prediction for the milling of Ti–6Al–4V ELI alloy with the use of statistical and soft computing techniques. Measurement 90, 25–35 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moaz, H.A., Basim, A.K., Ansari, M.N.M., Bashir, M.: FEM to predict the effect of feed rate on surface roughness with cutting force during face milling of titanium alloy. HBRC J. 9, 263–269 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miko, B.: Surface quality prediction in case of steep free form surface milling. Key Eng. Mater. 686, 119–124 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Savkovic, B., Kovac, P., Mankova, I., Gostimirovic, M., Rokosz, K., Rodic, D.: Surface roughness modeling of semi solid aluminum milling by fuzzy logic. J. Adv. Technol. Eng. Stud. 3(2), 44–56 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Demircioglu, P., Durakbasa, M.N.: Investigations on machined metal surfaces through the stylus type and optical 3D instruments and their mathematical modeling with the help of statistical techniques. Measurement 44, 611–619 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Felho, C., Kundrák, J.: Comparison of theoretical and real surface roughness in face milling with octagonal and circular inserts. Key Eng. Mater. 581, 360–365 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kundrák, J., Felho, C.: 3D roughness parameters of surfaces face milled by special tools. Manuf. Technol. 16(3), 532–538 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Felho, C.: Investigation of surface roughness in machining by single and multi-point tools. Ph.D. thesis, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C45/1.0503 Non-alloy quality steel - equivalent, chemical composition, properties. http://www.steelnumber.com/en/steel_composition_eu.php?name_id=152
  13. 13.
    Felho, C., Karpuschewski, B., Kundrák, J.: Surface roughness modelling in face milling. Procedia CIRP 31, 136–141 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Manufacturing ScienceUniversity of MiskolcMiskolcHungary

Personalised recommendations