Advertisement

Citizenry, Civic Education and Rule of Law

  • Jose Pablo Abreu SacramentoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter argues that living under the rule of law requires not only efficient and effective government agencies but also the extensive and responsible cooperation of ordinary people. This argument relies on a thick perspective of the rule of law (see Chaps.  2 and  4), implying a democratic life where people can exercise their human rights, among other things. Moreover, based on a reviewed version of the Principle of Fairness, the author maintains that individuals have to actively participate in public affairs and cooperate in community life as a moral implication of living together under the rule of law. And, in order to meet this goal, he contends that it is necessary to strengthen a public policy of civic education. Finally, the author argues in favor of that public policy because it helps to develop the virtue of reciprocity, a quality that is conducive to human flourishing and living together, taking into account that our social nature coexists with a liberal self-centred culture nowadays.

Keywords

Rule of law Civic education Citizenry Moral obligation Principle of fairness Reciprocity 

References

  1. 9 Barris Accul, Asociación vecinal; at: https://9bacull.org/es/ (28 December 2018).
  2. Abreu, Jose P.; Le Clercq, Juan A. (2011). “Introducción”, in: Abreu, Jose P.; Le Clercq, Juan A. (Eds.), La reforma humanista (Mexico City: Porrúa): 9–31.Google Scholar
  3. Almond, Gabriel; Verba, Sidney (1989). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (Newbury Park: SAGE Publications).Google Scholar
  4. Anscombe, G.E.M. (1958). “Modern Moral Philosophy”, in: Philosophy (Cambridge University Press), 33,124: 1–19.Google Scholar
  5. Arneson, Richard (1982). “The Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems”, in: Ethics, 92,4 (July): 616–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, Lawrence (1986), Reciprocity (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  7. Booth, John A.; Seligson, Mitchell A. (1994). “Paths to Democracy and the Political Culture of Costa Rica, Mexico, and Nicaragua”, in: Political Culture & Democracy in Developing Countries (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers).Google Scholar
  8. Brandt, Richard B. (1964). “The Concepts of Obligation and Duty”, Mind, New Series, 73,291 (July): 374–393.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, G.A. (2008). Rescuing Justice and Equality. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, G.A. (2009). Why not Socialism? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  11. CONAPRED, Consejo Nacional para Prevenir de la Discriminación (2017). Encuesta Nacional sobre Discriminación 2017 (Mexico City: CONAPRED); at: https://www.conapred.org.mx/index.php?contenido=pagina&id=604 (31 August 2018).
  12. Conde, Silvia L. (2016). Formacion ciudadana en Mexico (Mexico City: INE); at: https://www.ine.mx/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/cuaderno_32.pdf (31 August 2018).
  13. Diamond, Larry (1994a). “Introduction: Political Culture and Democracy”, in Political Culture & Democracy in Developing Countries (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers).Google Scholar
  14. Diamond, Larry (1994b). “Causes and Effects”, in: Political Culture & Democracy in Developing Countries (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers).Google Scholar
  15. Elster, Jon (Ed.) (1998). Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  16. Foot, P. (2002). “Virtues and Vices”, in: Virtues and Vices: and other essays in moral philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press); at:  https://doi.org/10.1093/0199252866.003.0001 (22 August 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hardin, Russell (2013). “The Free Rider Problem”, in: Zalta, Edward N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring); at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/free-rider/ (22 August 2017).
  18. Hart, J. (1955). “Are there any natural rights?”, in: The Philosophical Review, 64,2 (April): 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hursthouse, Rosalind; Pettigrove, Glen (2016). “Virtue Ethics”, in: Zalta, Edward N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter); at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/ethics-virtue/ (22 August 2017).
  20. INEGI (2017). Encuesta Nacional de Calidad e Impacto Gubernamental; at: https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/programas/encig/2017/doc/encig2017_principales_resultados.pdf (31 August 2018).
  21. INEGI (2018b). Encuesta Nacional de Empleo y Ocupación); at: https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/boletines/2018/enoe_ie/enoe_ie2018_08.pdf (31 August 2018).
  22. Instituto Electoral del Distrito Federal (IEDF) (2017). Estadística de Participación de la Consulta Ciudadana sobre Presupuesto Participativo 2016; at: http://portal.iedf.org.mx/biblioteca/estudioselect/estadistica_participacion_ccpp_2016.pdf (31 August 2018).
  23. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI) (2018a). Press release: Encuesta Nacional de Victimización y Percepción sobre Seguridad Pública; at: http://www.beta.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/boletines/2018/EstSegPub/envipe2018_09.pdf (25 September 2018).
  24. Instituto Nacional Electoral (INE) (2016). Estrategia Nacional de Cultura Cívica 2017–2023; at: https://portalanterior.ine.mx/archivos2/portal/historico/contenido/recursos/IFE-v2/DECEYEC/DECEYEC-Varios/2016/ENCCIVICA-Resumen-Ejecutivo.pdf (31 August 2018).
  25. Instituto Nacional Electoral and El Colegio de México (INE-COLMEX) (2015). Informe país sobre la calidad de ciudadanía en México; at: https://portalanterior.ine.mx/archivos2/s/DECEYEC/EducacionCivica/Resumen_Ejecutivo_23nov.pdf (31 August 2018).
  26. Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación Educativa (INEE) (2018). Estudio Internacional de Educación Cívica y Ciudadana, CIVICA 2016; at: https://www.inee.edu.mx/index.php/evaluaciones-internacionales/civica-2016 (31 August 2018).
  27. International Transparency (2017). Corruption Perception Index 2017; at: https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2017 (31 August 2017).
  28. Isensee, Josef (2011). “Libertad ciudadana y virtud ciudadana. La necesidad vital de la comunidad liberal”, in: Abreu Sacramento, Jose Pablo; Le Clercq, Juan Antonio (Eds.), La reforma humanista (Mexico City: M.A. Porrúa): 51–64.Google Scholar
  29. Klosko, Georges (2004). The Principle of Fairness and Political Obligation (Lanham and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers).Google Scholar
  30. Klurfeld, James; Schneider, Howard (2014). News Literacy: Teaching the Internet Generation to Make Reliable Information Choices; at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Klurfeld-SchneiderNews-Literacyupdated-7814.pdf (25 September 2018).
  31. Lamarche, Gara (2014). “Is Philanthropy Bad for Democracy?”, in: The Atlantic; at: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/10/is-philanthropy-good-for-democracy/381996/ (28 December 2018).
  32. Lasswell, Harold D. (1948). “The Structure and Function of Communication in Society”, in: Bryson, Lyman (Ed.), The Communication of Ideas (New York: Institute for Religious and Social Studies).Google Scholar
  33. Lowndes, Vivien; Roberts, Mark (2013). Why Institutions Matter: The New Institutionalism in Political Science (Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  34. Lyons, David (1965). Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism (Oxford: Oxford University Press); at: doi:  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198241973.001.0001 (28 December 2018).
  35. Mackie, J.L. (1965). “Causes and conditions”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 2,4 (October, 1965): 245–264.Google Scholar
  36. March, James G.; Olsen, Johan P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The organizational basis of politics (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  37. Mill, John Stuart (1861). Considerations on representative government (Kitchener: Batoche Books/The Gutenberg Project Ebook) (29 December 2018).Google Scholar
  38. Morales, Víctor; Martínez, Jorge (2012). “La educación cívica en México. Una nueva oportunidad”, for Association Francophone Internationale de Recherche Scientifique en Education (AFIRSE); at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315717238_LA_EDUCACION_CIVICA_EN_MEXICO_UNA_NUEVA_OPORTUNIDAD_LAS_RECIENTES_REFORMAS_CONSTITUCIONALES_ELECTORALES (31 August 2018).
  39. Murillo, Stefana (2017). “Las 9 iniciativas ciudadanas que el Congreso desdeñó”, in: La Silla Rota (20 December); at: https://lasillarota.com/especialeslsr/las-9-iniciativas-ciudadanas-que-el-congreso-desdeno-congreso-ley-3de3-camara-de-diputados-senado/195414 (31 August 2018).
  40. Nozick, Robert, (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Blackwell Publishing).Google Scholar
  41. Olson, Mancur (1965). The logic of collective action (Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  42. Otsuka, Michael (2017). “The principle of fairness (PF), public goods and political obligation”, Philosophy, Moral and Politics, lecture slides week 17, London School of Economics and Political Science, London.Google Scholar
  43. Putnam, Robert D. (1993). Making Democracy Work (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  44. Putnam, Robert D. (2000). Bowling Alone (New York: Simon & Schuster).Google Scholar
  45. Rawls, John, (1999). A Theory of Justice, revised edn. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  46. Reich, Rob (2016). “On the Role of Foundations in Democracies”, in: Reich, Rob; Cordelli, Chiara; Bernholz, Lucy (Eds.), Philanthropy in Democratic Societies (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press): 64–85.Google Scholar
  47. RESIDEntial Environment Study (RESIDE), The University of Western Australia; at: http://www.science.uwa.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/2805543/CBEH_Reside_Brochure_.pdf (28 December 2018).
  48. Sadowski, Christine M. (1994). “Autonomous Groups as Agents of Democratic Change in Communist and Post-Communist Eastern Europe”, in: Political Culture & Democracy in Developing Countries (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers).Google Scholar
  49. Sandel, Michael (1981). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  50. Scanlon, T.M. (1982). “Contractualism and Utilitarianism”, in Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Solís, Patricio (2017). Discriminación structural y desigualdad social (Mexico City: CONAPRED; at: https://www.conapred.org.mx/documentos_cedoc/Discriminacionestructural%20accs.pdf (31 August 2017).
  52. The Society for Community Research and Action (SCRA), Community Psychology, Division 27 of the American Psychological Association, at: http://www.scra27.org/resources/document-library/ (28 December 2018).
  53. Wall, Steven (2012). “Perfectionism in Moral and Political Philosophy”, in: Zalta, Edward N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012); at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/perfectionism-moral/ (22 August 2017).
  54. World Value Survey Association (2018). World Value Survey Wave 6, 2010–2014, Official Aggregate v.20150418 (Madrid: Asep/JDS); at: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp (31 August 2018).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LawTecnológico de MonterreyMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations