Advertisement

Transparency in the Insurance Contract Law of Poland

  • Katarzyna Malinowska
  • Anna TarasiukEmail author
Chapter
  • 31 Downloads
Part of the AIDA Europe Research Series on Insurance Law and Regulation book series (ERSILR, volume 2)

Abstract

As a starting point to our analysis, it should be made clear that Polish law does not provide any definition of transparency. In everyday language (transparentny or przejrzysty), it refers to an easy way of recognising or foreseeing, as well as meaning; public; revealed; not dubious; unambiguous; clear; without any doubts or suspicions as to the real meaning; full disclosure; comprehensibility; etc. In such a context, ‘transparency’ is used in legal texts, as well as in court judgements and opinions of the doctrine. Seemingly, the Polish understanding of transparency does not differ from its universal, international meaning. It is also, without a doubt, recognised as one of the foundations of the efficiency of free trade.

References

  1. Cousy H (2002) La fin de l’assurance? Considérations sur le domaine propre de l’assurance privée et ses frontières. In: Droit et économie de l’assurance et de la santé. Mélanges en l’honneur de Yvonne Lambert-Faivre et Denis-Clair Lambert. Dalloz, Paris, pp 111–128Google Scholar
  2. Geiringer B, IMD2: the review of the insurance mediation directive, p 3. http://www.out-law.com/page-11652
  3. Łuczyński M, Rekomendacja dobrych praktyk informacyjnych dotyczących ubezpieczeń na życie związanych z ubezpieczeniowymi funduszami kapitałowymi – element budowy nowoczesnego rynku ubezpieczeń na życie, Wiadomości Ubezpieczeniowe, numer specjalny 3/2013Google Scholar
  4. Malinowska K (2015) Transparentność w umowie ubezpieczenia - przemiana zasady najwyższego zaufania w prawo do informacji. In: Gnela B (ed) Informacja w prawie ubezpieczeń gospodarczych, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  5. Malinowska K (2008) Umowa ubezpieczenia w Europie bez granic, Bydgoszcz, p 62Google Scholar
  6. Malinowska K (2016) Insurance transparency and protection regime under the insurance distribution directive. Insurance Review/Wiadomosci Ubezpieczeniowe 4(2):89–101Google Scholar
  7. Maśniak D (2014) Wynagrodzenie pośrednika w ubezpieczeniach morskich i jego transparentność w świetle projektowanych zmian dyrektywy o pośrednictwie ubezpieczeniowym (IMD2), Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze, Tom XXXIIGoogle Scholar
  8. Maśniak D, Malinowska K, Czynności dystrybucyjne w nowym reżimie zawierania umów ubezpieczenia – wybrane aspekty implementacji dyrektywy nr 2016/97 w sprawie dystrybucji ubezpieczeń, Prawo Asekuracyjne 2/2017Google Scholar
  9. Orlicki M (2017) Znaczenie prawne informacji o istotnych elementach wzorca umowy w świetle art. 17 ustawy o działalności ubezpieczeniowej i reasekuracyjnej. Prawo Asekuracyjne 1:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ostrowska M (2014) Wdrażanie dyrektywy Solvency II i jej rola w integracji europejskiego rynku ubezpieczeniowego, Warsaw University Law review, nr 1/2015Google Scholar
  11. Tarasiuk-Flodrowska A (2014) Abusive clauses in consumer and insurance contracts – recent developments in Europe. Evropska Revija za Pravo Osiguranja/European Insurance Law Review 1:31–40Google Scholar
  12. Tarasiuk-Flodrowska A (2011) Bancassurance on the EU market – specificities of the Polish Law. Evropska Revija za Pravo Osiguranje/European Insurance Law Review 4:6–12Google Scholar
  13. Ulusoy S (2012) Transparency concerning on-line insurance. In: Transparency in insurance law. AIDA Seminar, Istanbul, p 39Google Scholar
  14. Wandt M (2014) Transparency as a general principle of insurance law. In: World congress of AIDA, RomeGoogle Scholar
  15. Więcko-Tułowiecka M (2017) Challenges of the payment protection insurance market – analysis of European tendencies in the context of the need for legal actions in Poland. Prawo Asekuracyjne 1:61–72Google Scholar

Legal Acts

  1. Act dated 23 April 1964 - The Civil Code (uniform text: O.J. 2018 item 1025, as amended)Google Scholar
  2. Act dated 29 September 1994 on Accountancy (uniform text: O.J. 2018, item 395, as amended)Google Scholar
  3. Act dated 2 March 2000 on the protection of the consumers rights and product liability, (O.J. 2000, No 22, item 271 as amended)Google Scholar
  4. Act dated 22 May 2003 on Insurance Activity (O.J. 2003, No 124, item 1151, as amended)Google Scholar
  5. Act dated 13 April 2007 amending the PCC (O.J. No 82, item 557)Google Scholar
  6. Act dated 13 April 2007 on the amendments to the Civil Code and some other acts (O.J. No 82, item 557)Google Scholar
  7. Act dated 16 February 2007 on Competition and Consumer Protection, (uniform text: O.J. 2018, item 798)Google Scholar
  8. Act dated 30 May 2014 on Consumer Rights (uniform text: O.J. 2017, item 683)Google Scholar
  9. Act dated 23 August 2007 on Counteracting unfair market practices (uniform text: O.J. 2017, item 2070)Google Scholar
  10. Act dated 11 September 2015 on Insurance and Reinsurance Activity (uniform text: O.J. 2018, item 999)Google Scholar
  11. Act dated 15 December 2017 on Insurance Distribution (O.J. 2018, item 2210, as amended)Google Scholar
  12. Regulation of the Minister of Finance dated 13 June 2012 on the manner to prepare and the scope of the document confirming the conclusion of compulsory insurance contracts (O.J. 2012, item 838)Google Scholar
  13. Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, (O.J. L 95, 21.4.1993.)Google Scholar
  14. Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations (O.J. EU L 204 dated 21.07.1998), p. 37Google Scholar
  15. Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EECGoogle Scholar
  16. Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) (Text with EEA relevance), (OJ L 335, 17.12.2009), pp. 1–155Google Scholar
  17. Directive (EU) 2016/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 January 2016 on insurance distribution (OJ L 26/19), pp. 19–59Google Scholar
  18. Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on key information documents for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs) (O.J. L 352/1).Google Scholar
  19. Regulation dated 16 December 2015 of the Minister or Finance regarding information provided in the general contractual terms used by insurance companies (O.J. 2015, item 2189)Google Scholar
  20. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1469 of 11 August 2017 laying down a standardised presentation format for the insurance product information document (O.J. L 209), 12.8.2017, pp. 19–23.Google Scholar
  21. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2359 of 21 September 2017 on information requirements and conduct of business rules applicable to the distribution of insurance-based investment products conduct requirements (IBIPs) (O.J. L 341/8)Google Scholar
  22. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2358 of 21 September 2017 supplementing Directive (EU) 2016/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to product oversight and governance requirements for insurance undertakings and insurance distributors (O.J. L 341/8)Google Scholar

Administrative Decisions

  1. Decision of SOKiK dated 23 January 2012 (XVII AmC 977/11), http://orzeczenia.warszawa.so.gov.pl/details/$N/154505000005127_XVII_AmC_000977_2011_Uz_2012-01-23_001. Accessed 1 Jan 2018

Case Law

  1. Decision of the Supreme Court – Civil Chamber dated 28 March 2007 (II CNP 124/06)Google Scholar
  2. Decision of the Supreme Court – Civil Chamber dated 12 January 2007 (IV CSK 307/06)Google Scholar
  3. Decision of the Supreme Court – Civil Division, dated 2 December 2011 (III CSK 55/11)Google Scholar
  4. Decision of the Supreme Court – Civil Division, dated 10 February 2016, (I CSK 1/15); Please also see: Decision of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw – Civil Division, dated 24 October 2013, (I ACA 535/13) or Decision of the Supreme Court – Civil Division, dated 15 February 2013, (I CSK 313/12)Google Scholar
  5. Decision of the District Court in Warsaw dated 22 January 2015 (XXV C 430/12)Google Scholar
  6. Decision of the District Court in Warsaw dated 28 June 2012 (XVII AmA 58/11)Google Scholar
  7. Decision of the District Court in Warsaw dated 29 December 2014 (XXIV C 828/13)Google Scholar
  8. Decision of the Supreme Court dated 28 September 2018 (I CSK 179/18)Google Scholar
  9. The Polish Supreme Court decisions dated 16.09.2016 (IV CSK 711/15), Legalis no. 1716875 (on the interpretation of unclear contractual provisions); dated 06.02.2015 (II CSK 295/14)Google Scholar

Other Sources

  1. Letter of the President of the Polish Financial Supervisory Authority dated 04.04.2017 regarding the presentation of the general insurance terms and conditions on insurers’ websites. https://www.knf.gov.pl/knf/pl/komponenty/img/stanowisko_UKNF_publikacja_OWU_przez_ZU_4_04_2017_50687.pdf
  2. Office of Competition and Consumer Protection, Consumer Politics Department (2010) Report on the control of the general terms applied in life insurances, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  3. Office of the Commission on Supervision of Insurance and Pension Funds (2005) Irregularities in the general insurance terms and conditions. Department of the Communication and European Integration, Warsaw, p 4Google Scholar
  4. Office for Consumer and Competition Protection, Consumer Politics Department; Report on the control of the general terms applied by insurers, September 2006, Warsaw.Google Scholar
  5. Recommendation U regarding good practices in respect of bancassurance, Commission for Financial Supervision, June 2014. http://www.knf.gov.pl/Images/Rekomendacja_U_tcm75-38338.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2016
  6. Guidelines for insurance companies regarding the distribution of insurance, Commission for Financial Supervision, 24 June 2014a,Google Scholar
  7. Guidelines for insurance companies regarding the distribution of insurance, Commission for Financial Supervision, June 2014b., http://www.knf.gov.pl/Images/Wytyczne_dystrybucja_ubezpieczen_24-06-14_tcm75-38337.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2016
  8. Working Paper: Online services, including e-commerce, in the Single Market; Commission Staff Working Document Online Services, Including E-Commerce, In The Single Market Accompanying The Document Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions; A coherent framework to boost confidence in the Digital Single Market of e-commerce And other online services {COM(2011) 942 final} {SEC(2011) 1640 finalGoogle Scholar
  9. Technical Advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Insurance Distribution Directive, EIOPA, 1 February 2017, EIOPA-17/048Google Scholar
  10. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/653 of 8 March 2017 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on key information documents for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs) by laying down regulatory technical standards with regard to the presentation, content, review and revision of key information documents and the conditions for fulfilling the requirement to provide such documents, C/2017/1473, (OJ L 100), 12.4.2017, pp. 1–52Google Scholar
  11. Consultation document on the Review of the Insurance Mediation Directive (IMD) Commission Staff Working Paper, p 9Google Scholar
  12. Polish Language Dictionary. https://sjp.pwn.pl/szukaj/przejrzysty.html

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kozminski UniversityWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Lyszkiewicz Tarasiuk Kancelaria Radcow Prawnych Sp.p.WarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations